Why johnny can read: the role of statistical regularities in reading and connectionist modeling

OF THE DISSERTATION Why Johnny Can Read: The Role of Statistical Regularities in Reading and Connectionist Modeling by Jeanne Claire Milostan Doctor of Philosophy in Cognitive Science and Computer Science University of California, San Diego, 1999 Professor Garrison W. Cottrell, Chair As is true for almost all computational modeling of higher brain functions, debate currently rages over models which address the ability to read. Three current models (the single-route connectionist system of (Plaut et al., 1996), the Dual-Route Cascade of (Coltheart et al., 1993), and the connectionist Dual-Process model of (Zorzi et al., 1998b)) are examined in relation to various human reading data. An apparently serial e ect seen in irregular words, where early irregularities cause more slowing in pronunciation time than late irregularities, is reanalyzed with respect to enemy/friend ratios, and the results of subject experiments are presented. The work of (Plaut et al., 1996) is extended to handle multisyllabic words, modeling the e ect seen in the human studies, and thus showing that the position-of-irregularity e ect is not a serial phenomena after all. xv Chapter

[1]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[2]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[3]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[4]  R. Venezky The Structure of English Orthography , 1965 .

[5]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture , 1993 .

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[7]  Kerry Kilborn,et al.  Selective impairment of grammatical morphology due to induced stress in normal listeners: Implications for aphasia , 1991, Brain and Language.

[8]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Content and cluster analysis: Assessing representational similarity in neural systems , 2000 .

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[10]  H. Kolk,et al.  A Time-Based Approach to Agrammatic Production , 1995, Brain and Language.

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[12]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[13]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[14]  D. Neary,et al.  Deep Dyslexia , 1986 .

[15]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[16]  V. Marchman,et al.  From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets , 1993, Cognition.

[17]  R. Peereman Naming regular and exception words: Further examination of the effect of phonological dissension among lexical neighbours , 1995 .

[18]  D. Plaut Relearning after Damage in Connectionist Networks: Implications for Patient Rehabilitation , 1996 .

[19]  E K Warrington,et al.  Concrete word dyslexia. , 1981, British journal of psychology.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[21]  M. Zorzi Serial processing in reading aloud: no challenge for a parallel model. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Organization of face and object recognition in modular neural network models , 1999, Neural Networks.

[23]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  One Second of Reading. , 1972 .

[24]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Development of Spelling-Sound Relationships in a Model of Phonological Reading , 1998 .

[25]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[26]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Representing lexical semantics with context vectors and modeling lexical access with attractor networks , 1998 .

[27]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[28]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in a Distributed Attractor Network , 1995 .

[29]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Assessing the contribution of representation to results , 1998 .

[30]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. , 1999, Psychological review.

[31]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[32]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[33]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[34]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Image compression by back-propagation: An example of extensional programming , 1988 .

[36]  K. Goodman Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .

[37]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of Reading , 1982 .

[38]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Structure and Content in Language Production: A Theory of Frame Constraints in Phonological Speech Errors , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Acquiring the Mapping from Meaning to Sounds , 1994, Connect. Sci..

[40]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Reduced resources and specific impairments in normal and aphasic sentence comprehension , 1995 .

[41]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud , 1999 .

[42]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[43]  S. Pinker,et al.  On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition , 1988, Cognition.

[44]  T. Bever,et al.  The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning—A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models , 1988, Cognition.

[45]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[46]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. , 1991, Psychological review.

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[49]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[50]  Ivan Illich,et al.  ABC: The Alphabetization of the Popular Mind , 1988 .

[51]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[52]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation assembly and the locus of word-frequency effects in naming. , 1987 .