Processing of Reference and the Structure of Language: An Analysis of Complex Noun Phrases

Five experiments used self-paced reading time to examine the ways in which complex noun phrases (both conjoined NPs and possessive NPs) influence the interpretation of referentially dependent expressions. The experimental conditions contrasted the reading of repeated names and pronouns referring to components of a complex NP and to the entire complex NP. The results indicate that the entity introduced by a major constituent of a sentence is more accessible as a referent than the entities introduced by component noun phrases. This pattern of accessibility departs from the advantage of first mention that has been demonstrated using probe-word recognition tasks. It supports the idea that reduced expressions are interpreted as referring directly to prominent entities in a mental model whereas reference by names to entities that are already represented in a mental model is mediated by additional processes. The same interpretive processes appear to operate on coreference within and between sentences.

[1]  Alan Garnham,et al.  The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns , 1992 .

[2]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  The mental models theory language of comprehension , 1996 .

[3]  B. Murdock,et al.  The distinctiveness of stimuli. , 1960, Psychological review.

[4]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[5]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[6]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse , 1983, ACL.

[7]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Coherence of Discourse , 1994 .

[8]  S. Garrod,et al.  THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES , 1982 .

[9]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronouns, Passives, and Discourse Coherence , 1995 .

[10]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[11]  Evidence that Binding Principles Participate in a Constraint Satisfaction Process , 1994 .

[12]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[14]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[15]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[16]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  Distinctiveness and Serial Position Effects in Recognition and Sentence Processing , 1994 .

[17]  P. Gordon,et al.  Intuitive knowledge of linguistic co-reference , 1997, Cognition.

[18]  I. Neath.  Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function. , 1993 .

[19]  M. Walker,et al.  A bilateral approach to givenness : A hearer-status algorithm and a centering algorithm , 1996 .

[20]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[21]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The syntactic domain of anaphora , 1976 .

[22]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[24]  M. Beeman,et al.  Building and Accessing Clausal Representations: The Advantage of First Mention versus the Advantage of Clause Recency. , 1989, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  I. Neath.  Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  The Representation and Use of Focus in a System for Understanding Dialogs , 1977, IJCAI.

[27]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  Formal philosophy, selected papers of richard montague , 1976 .

[28]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[30]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents , 1975, Cognition.

[31]  John R. Frederiksen,et al.  Understanding Anaphora: Rules Used by Readers in Assigning Pronominal Referents. Technical Report No. 3, December 1, 1976 through July 1, 1980. , 1981 .

[32]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Pronoun resolution and discourse models. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  S. Brennan.  Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .

[34]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The advantage of first mention in Spanish , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  C. Fletcher.  Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .

[36]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[37]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Structure-Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. , 1995 .

[38]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse , 1988 .

[39]  M. Gernsbacher.  Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[40]  R J Stevenson,et al.  The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns , 1990, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking , 1997 .

[42]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[43]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Integrating Information in Text Comprehension: The Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases , 1989 .

[44]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Discourse: The Establishment and Maintenance of Reference , 2022 .