Investigating Collaborative Development Activities in a Virtual World: An Activity Theory Perspective

Contemporary virtual worlds provide unique environments in which users may collaborate in the development of shared digital artifacts. However, the ways in which such collaboration takes place is to date under researched. This paper uses an activity theory perspective to analyze the development activities of two communities within the virtual world of Second Life, based on data gathered using ethnographic methods. The study reveals (1) the complimentary and diverging practices utilized by these two different communities of practice, (2) the mediating function of various tools, rules, and work roles in collaborative development activities, (3) the tensions created in such activities and the manner in which users overcome these tensions.

[1]  Tibert Verhagen,et al.  Understanding virtual world usage: A multipurpose model and empirical testing , 2009, ECIS.

[2]  María A. Rodríguez-Manzanares,et al.  Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology , 2008 .

[3]  Paulo Martins,et al.  Using Second Life in Programming's Communities of Practice , 2009, CRIWG.

[4]  Andrew Whitworth,et al.  Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[5]  Scott Curland Chase.  Virtual worlds as collaborative environments for design and manufacturing: from idea to product , 2008 .

[6]  Luke Tredinnick.  Web 2.0 and Business , 2006 .

[7]  Zaheer Hussain,et al.  Online gaming: a scoping study of massively multi-player online role playing games , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res..

[8]  Anthony Williams,et al.  Second Life: a context for design learning , 2009 .

[9]  Steven Warburton,et al.  Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Using virtual worlds as collaborative environments for innovation and design: lessons learned and observations from case studies in architectural projects , 2009 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[12]  John D. Murphy,et al.  Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  J. Herbsleb,et al.  Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla , 2002, TSEM.

[14]  Maria Rosita Cagnina,et al.  Beyond e-business models: the road to virtual worlds , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res..

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Situated practices of looking: visual practice in an online world , 2008, CSCW.

[16]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[17]  A. Hemetsberger,et al.  Collective Development in Open-Source Communities: An Activity Theoretical Perspective on Successful Online Collaboration , 2009 .

[18]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .

[19]  Edward Castronova,et al.  Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  Carina Girvan,et al.  Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: A Communal Constructivism case study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[21]  James D. Palmer,et al.  Computer supported cooperative work , 1994, Computer.

[22]  Mike Dobson,et al.  Transforming Tensions in Learning Technology Design: Operationalising Activity Theory , 2004 .

[23]  W. Diehl,et al.  Unintended Outcomes in Second Life: Intercultural Literacy and Cultural Identity in a Virtual World , 2008 .

[24]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Why people buy virtual items in virtual worlds with real money , 2007, DATB.

[25]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Activity Theory As a Lens for Characterizing the Participatory Unit. , 2004 .

[26]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[27]  Ian MacInnes,et al.  Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[28]  Karl Reiner Lang,et al.  The virtual cathedral and the virtual bazaar , 2007, DATB.

[29]  Ned Kock,et al.  E-Collaboration and E-Commerce In Virtual Worlds: The Potential of Second Life and World of Warcraft , 2008, Int. J. e Collab..

[30]  Annita Fjuk,et al.  Understanding the roles of online meetings in a net-based course , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[31]  Kenneth M. Anderson,et al.  A View of Software Development Environments Based on Activity Theory , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[32]  Keng Siau,et al.  3-D Virtual Worlds in Education: Applications, Benefits, Issues, and Opportunities , 2008, J. Database Manag..

[33]  Günther Dippe.  The Missing Teacher: Contradictions and Conflicts in the Experience of Online Learners , 2006 .

[34]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Modular Approach to Teaching and Learning of Virtual Collaboration , 2009, AMCIS.

[35]  Amy Shuen,et al.  Web 2.0 - a strategy guide: business thinking and strategies behind successful Web 2.0 implementations , 2008 .

[36]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[37]  David Hinds,et al.  Engaging Group E-Learning in Virtual Worlds , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  Gather round the wiki-tree : virtual worlds as an open platform for architectural collaboration , 2008 .

[39]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[40]  Philip O'Reilly,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 2009 INNOVATION IN VIRTUAL WORLDS : SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND DIFFUSION , 2017 .

[41]  R. Kozinets.  The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[42]  Greg Madey,et al.  THE OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PHENOMENON: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON SOCIAL NETWORK THEORY , 2002 .

[43]  Rebecca Jestice,et al.  Team collaboration in virtual worlds , 2007, DATB.

[44]  Daren C. Brabham.  Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[45]  Johann Füller,et al.  Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation , 2009 .

[46]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  The Shoemaker's Children: Using Wikis for Information Systems Teaching, Research, and Publication , 2009, MIS Q..

[47]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Doing Virtually Nothing: Awareness and Accountability in Massively Multiplayer Online Worlds , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[48]  Vili Lehdonvirta,et al.  Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res..

[49]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The Experience of Embodied Space in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[50]  Tom Boellstorff.  Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human , 2008 .

[51]  Richard Bartle,et al.  Designing Virtual Worlds , 2003 .

[52]  Y. Benkler,et al.  Commons‐based Peer Production and Virtue* , 2006 .

[53]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Where Theory Meets Practice: A Case for an Activity Theory Based Methodology to Guide Computer System Design , 2001, INTERACT.

[54]  Christoph Lattemann,et al.  USER ACCEPTANCE OF VIRTUAL WORLDS , 2008 .

[55]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory , 2006, Inf. Res..

[56]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[57]  Honglei Li,et al.  Virtual Community Studies: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda , 2004, AMCIS.

[58]  D. Murthy.  Digital Ethnography , 2008 .

[59]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[60]  E. Damiani,et al.  Activity Theory for OSS Ecosystems , 2007, 2007 Inaugural IEEE-IES Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference.

[61]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Managing content in e-learning environments , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[62]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[63]  Y. Engeström,et al.  New Forms of Learning in Co-Configuration Work. , 2004 .

[64]  Michele D. Dickey,et al.  Three-dimensional virtual worlds and learning: An analysis of the impact of design affordances and limitations in Active Worlds, Blaxxun Interactive, and OnLive! Traveler; and a study of the implementation of Active Worlds for formal and informal education , 1999 .

[65]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[66]  David Zager,et al.  Collaboration as an Activity Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[67]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[68]  Moez Limayem,et al.  Understanding Consumer Virtual Shopping Behavior in 3D Virtual Worlds: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation , 2008, ICIS.

[69]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  Virtual Worlds as Platforms for Communities of Practice , 2009, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning.