A Federated Enterprise Architecture and MBSE Modeling Framework for Integrating Design Automation into a Global PLM Approach

PLM and Design Automation (DA) are two interdependent and necessary approaches to increase the performance and efficiency of product development processes. Often, DA systems’ usability suffers due to a lack of integration in industrial business environments stemming from the independent consideration of PLM and DA. This article proposes a methodological and modeling framework for developing and deploying DA solutions within a global PLM approach. This framework supports the identification of DA potentials and the definition of the DA task building blocks to support DA task formalization by practitioners. The aim is to make the specification and development of DA solutions more efficient and aligned with the business requirements and with the existing digital environments. This framework combines the usage of two standardized modeling languages to make the captured knowledge re-usable across heterogeneous PLM and DA applications. An industrial case study demonstrating the applicability of the framework is introduced and discussed.

[1]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  A Modular Decision-centric Approach for Reusable Design Processes , 2009, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[2]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Ontology-Based Executable Design Decision Template Representation and Reuse , 2015 .

[3]  Manas Bajaj,et al.  Simulation-Based Design Using SysML Part 1: A Parametrics Primer , 2007 .

[4]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Estimating the Potential of State of the Art Design Automation - Tasks, Methods, and Benefits , 2016 .

[5]  Emna Moones,et al.  PLM Standards Modelling for Enterprise Interoperability: A Manufacturing Case Study for ERP and MES Systems Integration Based on ISA-95 , 2015, IWEI.

[6]  Emna Moones,et al.  Towards an Extended Interoperability Systemic Approach for Dynamic Manufacturing Networks: Role and Assessment of PLMStandards , 2014, CSDM.

[7]  Fredrik Elgh,et al.  Design Automation in SMEs Current State, Potential, Need and Requirements , 2005 .

[8]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Problem Map: An Ontological Framework for a Computational Study of Problem Formulation in Engineering Design , 2015, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[9]  Jianzhong Cha,et al.  Design synthesis approach based on process decomposition to design reuse , 2012 .

[10]  Manas Bajaj,et al.  9.3.3 Simulation‐Based Design Using SysML Part 2: Celebrating Diversity by Example , 2007 .

[11]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Framework for Computational Design Synthesis: Model and Applications , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[12]  Peter Bernus,et al.  Handbook on Enterprise Architecture , 2010, International Handbooks on Information Systems.

[13]  Jenny A. Harding,et al.  A framework to integrate design knowledge reuse and requirements management in engineering design , 2008 .

[14]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of Empirical Design Studies and Metrics , 2016 .

[15]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities , 2003 .

[16]  Marc M. Lankhorst,et al.  Enterprise architecture modelling--the issue of integration , 2004, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  M. Abramovici Future Trends in Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) , 2007 .

[18]  Jonathan G. Lund,et al.  PLM-Based Parametrics for Design Automation and Optimization , 2005 .

[19]  Guy Doumeingts,et al.  Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Past, present and future , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[20]  Larry Whitman,et al.  A taxonomy of a living model of the enterprise , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).