Balancing safety and support: Changing lanes with a haptic lane-keeping support system

Haptic guidance on the steering wheel has been shown to be useful in supporting drivers during lane keeping and curve negotiation. One successful realization is haptic guidance that continuously produces torques on the steering wheel depending on predicted lateral lane deviations. Thus, both driver and support system contribute to the steering wheel torque, sharing lateral control of the vehicle. However, current shared control systems do not support drivers during a lane change, a driving task diametrically opposed to lane keeping. This study describes the design and evaluation of an extension of lane-keeping haptic guidance, which also continuously and smoothly supports lane changes. An experiment in a fixed-base driving simulator was conducted to assess the effect of the support system on lane change behavior when haptic guidance was provided during both lane-keeping and lane-changing situations. In agreement with previous findings, objective measures and subjective responses showed that the presented haptic guidance was beneficial during lane-keeping tasks, resulting in small but significantly increased performance with a smoother and reduced steering activity. Although the developed system increased the measured steering wheel peak torque during the start of lane changes, subjective responses showed that drivers could comfortably make lane changes and felt in control during the maneuver. Concluding, the designed system provides drivers with the benefits of (previously designed) haptic guidance for lane-keeping, while allowing them to smoothly change lanes at any time.

[1]  Mark Mulder,et al.  Exploring the Dimensions of Haptic Feedback Support in Manual Control , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[2]  S. Glaser,et al.  Experimental time to line crossing validation , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005..

[3]  Max Mulder,et al.  Haptic gas pedal feedback for active car-following support , 2007 .

[4]  R. Brent Gillespie,et al.  Sharing Control Between Humans and Automation Using Haptic Interface: Primary and Secondary Task Performance Benefits , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Saïd Mammar,et al.  Driver's influence on the performance of an integrated lane departure avoidance and lane keeping assistance system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control, (ISIC).

[6]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Vibro-Tactile Information Presentation in Automobiles , 2001 .

[7]  Karon E. MacLean,et al.  Predictive haptic guidance: intelligent user assistance for the control of dynamic tasks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Elias B. Kosmatopoulos,et al.  Strategies and spacing requirements for lane changing and merging in automated highway systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[9]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Tactile and Multisensory Spatial Warning Signals for Drivers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[10]  Mark Mulder,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance on curve negotiation behavior of young, experienced drivers , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[11]  Jing-Fu Liu,et al.  Development of an Interactive Lane Keeping Control System for Vehicle , 2007, 2007 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[12]  T. Sattel,et al.  Combining haptic human-machine interaction with predictive path planning for lane-keeping and collision avoidance systems , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[13]  Mario Milanese,et al.  Combined Automatic Lane-Keeping and Driver's Steering Through a 2-DOF Control Strategy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  M. Mulder,et al.  Motivation for continuous haptic gas pedal feedback to support car following , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.