Biocompatibility Analysis of GelMa Hydrogel and Silastic RTV 9161 Elastomer for Encapsulation of Electronic Devices for Subdermal Implantable Devices

The natural differences between human-made electronics and biological tissues constitute a huge challenge in materials and the manufacturing of next-generation bioelectronics. As such, we performed a series of consecutive experiments for testing the biofunctionality and biocompatibility for device implantation, by changing the exterior chemical and physical properties of electronics coating it with silicone or hydrogels. In this article, we present a comparison of the main characteristics of an electronic device coated with either silicone or hydrogel (GelMa). The coating was performed with a bioprinter for accurate silicone and hydrogel deposition around different electronic chips (Step-Down Voltage Regulator U3V15F5 from Pololu Corporation). The results demonstrate that the hydrogel coating presents an augmented biomechanical and biochemical interface and superior biocompatibility, lowers foreign body response, and considerably extends the capabilities for bioelectronic applications.

[1]  Liang Li,et al.  Ultra‐stretchable, fast self‐healing, conductive hydrogels for writing circuits and magnetic sensor , 2021, Polymer International.

[2]  A. Arkudas,et al.  Gelatin methacryloyl is a slow degrading material allowing vascularization and long-term use in vivo , 2021, Biomedical materials.

[3]  Andrew R Spencer,et al.  Human‐Recombinant‐Elastin‐Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized Soft Tissues , 2020, Advanced materials.

[4]  Takashi D. Y. Kozai,et al.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain , 2017, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Next-generation probes, particles, and proteins for neural interfacing , 2017, Science Advances.

[6]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Advances in engineering hydrogels , 2017, Science.

[7]  Kevin J. Otto,et al.  Resistive and reactive changes to the impedance of intracortical microelectrodes can be mitigated with polyethylene glycol under acute in vitro and in vivo settings , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[8]  Anthony Atala,et al.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[10]  S. Rajan,et al.  Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant–tissue interface , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  D. Seliktar Designing Cell-Compatible Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications , 2012, Science.

[12]  M. Rota,et al.  Essential role of diastolic oscillatory potentials in adrenergic control of guinea pig sino-atrial node discharge , 2009, Journal of Biomedical Science.

[13]  Shashi K. Murthy,et al.  Bridging the Divide between Neuroprosthetic Design, Tissue Engineering and Neurobiology , 2009, Front. Neuroeng..

[14]  Jessica O. Winter,et al.  Adhesion Molecule-Modified Biomaterials for Neural Tissue Engineering , 2009, Front. Neuroeng..

[15]  S. Cogan Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. , 2008, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[16]  Fabio Albano,et al.  Design of an implantable power supply for an intraocular sensor, using POWER (power optimization for wireless energy requirements) , 2007 .

[17]  T. Groth,et al.  Surface properties of and cell adhesion onto allylamine-plasma-coated polyethylenterephtalat membranes. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[18]  D. Mooney,et al.  Hydrogels for tissue engineering. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[19]  M Cornelissen,et al.  Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. , 2000, Biomacromolecules.

[20]  L. Fiette,et al.  Histopathology procedures: from tissue sampling to histopathological evaluation. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  Thibault P. Prevost,et al.  Biomechanics of brain tissue. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.