Dual-electrode CMUT with non-uniform membranes for high electromechanical coupling coefficient and high bandwidth operation

In this paper, we report measurement results on dual-electrode CMUT demonstrating electromechanical coupling coefficient (k2) of 0.82 at 90% of collapse voltage as well as 136% 3 dB one-way fractional bandwidth at the transducer surface around the design frequency of 8 MHz. These results are within 5% of the predictions of the finite element simulations. The large bandwidth is achieved mainly by utilizing a non-uniform membrane, introducing center mass to the design, whereas the dual-electrode structure provides high coupling coefficient in a large dc bias range without collapsing the membrane. In addition, the non-uniform membrane structure improves the transmit sensitivity of the dual-electrode CMUT by about 2dB as compared with a dual electrode CMUT with uniform membrane.

[1]  J. McLean,et al.  Low temperature fabrication of immersion capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers on silicon and dielectric substrates , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  A. Atalar,et al.  Optimization of the gain-bandwidth product of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  A. Atalar,et al.  Improved performance of cMUT with nonuniform membranes , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[4]  B.T. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Calculation and measurement of electromechanical coupling coefficient of capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  John Mould,et al.  Silicon substrate ringing in microfabricated ultrasonic transducers , 2000, 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121).

[6]  F.L. Degertekin,et al.  Analysis and design of dual-electrode CMUTs , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[7]  P.-C. Eccardt,et al.  Linear and nonlinear equivalent circuit modeling of CMUTs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  G. Kino.  Acoustic waves : devices, imaging, and analog signal processing , 1987 .

[9]  Fahrettin Levent Degertekin,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers for forward looking intravascular imaging arrays , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[10]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Improving the performance of capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers using modified membrane and support structures , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[11]  P. Reynolds,et al.  Finite‐element method for determination of electromechanical coupling coefficient for piezoelectric and capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers , 2000 .

[12]  Xuefeng Zhuang,et al.  Optimized membrane configuration improves CMUT performance , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[13]  D. Mills,et al.  Real-time in-vivo imaging with capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (cMUT) linear arrays , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[14]  Xuefeng Zhuang,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers (cmuts) with piston-shaped membranes , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[15]  J. Zahorian,et al.  Characterization of dual-electrode CMUTs: demonstration of improved receive performance and pulse echo operation with dynamic membrane shaping , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  J. McLean,et al.  CMUTS with dual electrode structure for improved transmit and receive performance , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  L. Lim,et al.  Characterization of flux-grown PZN-PT single crystals for high-performance piezo devices , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.