In this study we quantify the effects of different relaxation mechanisms on the signal intensity in gradient‐echo images of tissue such as bone marrow in the presence of trabecular bone. The susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and soft tissue produces distortions in the magnetic lines of force which induce strong inhomogeneities in the static magnetic field. Diffusion of tissue protons in such magnetic field gradients produce a shortening of the transverse relaxation time T2, while the dephasing of the transverse magnetization due to susceptibility differences produces a shortening of the apparent relaxation time T 2* as demonstrated in gradient‐echo images. We have used specimens of dried human vertebrae with different bone densities immersed in either saline to simulate tissue water or an emulsion of oil and water to simulate bone marrow to quantify these relaxation mechanisms in vitro. We have measured the MR relaxation times T1, T2, and T 2* of protons within the trabecular spaces and correlated their variations with trabecular bone density. We have found that in vitro, at 1.5 T, the relaxation times T1 and T2 do not show significant variations with bone density and there are no significant contributions to the transverse relaxation rate due to the diffusion of tissue water in the magnetic field gradients. However, the relaxation rate, 1/T 2* , of saline in the presence of trabecular bone increases at a rate of 0.2 s−1 mg/cc due to the dephasing of the transverse magnetization in the magnetic field inhomogeneities. Similar bone density‐related T 2* variations were observed for fat protons within the trabeculae where the chemical‐shift‐induced modulations of signal intensity in an oil‐water emulsion have been separated from the susceptibility‐induced relaxation effects. In addition, we have verified these effects in vivo and quantified in vivo variations in fat and water relaxation rates of bone marrow in the epiphysis and diaphysis in the appendicular skeleton of normal volunteers and found that both fat and water T 2* are shorter in the epiphysis compared to the diaphysis, which correlates well with previous observations. © 1991 Academic Press, Inc.
[1]
R B Buxton,et al.
Susceptibility induced MR line broadening: applications to brain iron mapping.
,
1988,
Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[2]
S. Majumdar.
Quantitative study of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: Computer simulations
,
1991,
Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[3]
C. A. Davis,et al.
The effects of bone on proton NMR relaxation times of surrounding liquids.
,
1986,
Investigative radiology.
[4]
John C. Gore,et al.
Studies of diffusion in random fields produced by variations in susceptibility
,
1988
.
[5]
A. Shimakawa,et al.
Chemical shift-induced amplitude modulations in images obtained with gradient refocusing.
,
1987,
Magnetic resonance imaging.
[6]
H. Genant,et al.
Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography.
,
1980,
Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[7]
H E Rockette,et al.
The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment.
,
1990,
Investigative radiology.
[8]
G. Sebag,et al.
Effect of trabecular bone on the appearance of marrow in gradient-echo imaging of the appendicular skeleton.
,
1990,
Radiology.
[9]
B. Rosen,et al.
Magnetic susceptibility effects of trabecular bone on magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow.
,
1990,
Investigative radiology.