Refinement for Ontology Evolution in Virtual Enterprises

Virtual enterprise is based on the premise that work should be done where it can be done most optimally. In virtual enterprises, geographical boundaries merge seamlessly. It enables organisations to act in a way of flexibility and ability to adapt to rapid changes on the fly. However, different parties in a virtual enterprise must understand each other before they go further details in business. Ontologies are such kinds of ideal baselines to assist parties to communicate. One of the essential research issues with ontology is how to deal with changes during their evolving cycle. Therefore, ontology refinement is a crucial component in ontology evolution. This paper presents a taxonomy structure focusing on the is-a relations. In particular, the concept of closeness measurement is introduced based on the “distance” estimation. An extended cluster analysis process is provided. According to the algorithm presented, a new concept is generated according to its attributes. Additionally, the refinement mechanisms for primitive operations are proposed. Unlike some other ontology refinement mechanisms which leave ontology consistency checking to human users after modification, our method emphasises the importance of consistency checking by applying description logics which is demonstrated based on the proposed ontology.

[1]  P. Sopp Cluster analysis. , 1996, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[2]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Monica Divitini,et al.  An agent-based approach to modelling virtual enterprises , 2001 .

[4]  Suresh Manandhar,et al.  Proposal for Evaluating Ontology Refinement Methods , 2002, LREC.

[5]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[6]  Paul R. Gamble,et al.  The Virtual Corporation: An IT Challenge , 1992 .

[7]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Understanding ontological engineering , 2002, CACM.

[8]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[9]  Monica Divitini,et al.  Using Agents to Support the Selection of Virtual Enterprise Teams , 2002, AOIS@AAMAS.

[10]  Fiona McNeill Dynamic ontology refinement , 2003 .

[11]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Description Logics as Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web , 2005, Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning.

[12]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[13]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A Description Logic with Transitive and Inverse Roles and Role Hierarchies , 1999, J. Log. Comput..

[14]  Boris Motik,et al.  User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management , 2002, EKAW.

[15]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[16]  Uta Gerhardt The Negotiation Model , 1989 .

[17]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .