MicrAnt: Towards Regression Task Oriented Annotation Tool for Microscopic Images

Annotating a dataset for training a Supervised Machine Learning algorithm is time and annotator’s attention intensive. Our goal was to create a tool that would enable us to create annotations of the dataset with minimal demands on expert’s time. Inspired by applications such as Tinder, we have created an annotation tool for describing microscopic images. A graphical user interface is used to select from a couple of images the one with the higher value of the examined parameter. Two experiments were performed. The first compares the speed of annotation of our application with the commonly used tool for processing microscopic images. In the second experiment, the texture description was compared with the annotations from MicrAnt application and commonly used application. The results showed that the processing time using our application is 3 times lower and the Spearman coefficient increases by 0.05 than using a commonly used application. In an experiment, we have shown that the annotations processed using our application increase the correlation of the studied parameter and texture descriptors compared with manual annotations .

[1]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[2]  Marc Lartaud,et al.  Analyzing huge pathology images with open source software , 2013, Diagnostic Pathology.

[3]  Levon M Khachigian,et al.  DNAzyme Targeting c-jun Suppresses Skin Cancer Growth , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[4]  Georgios Gousios,et al.  Oops, my tests broke the build: An analysis of Travis CI builds with GitHub , 2016, PeerJ Prepr..

[5]  R.M. Haralick,et al.  Statistical and structural approaches to texture , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Miroslav Jiřík,et al.  Novel morphological multi-scale evaluation system for quality assessment of decellularized liver scaffolds , 2020, Journal of tissue engineering.

[7]  Matloob Khushi,et al.  Open source tools for management and archiving of digital microscopy data to allow integration with patient pathology and treatment information , 2013, Diagnostic Pathology.

[8]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[9]  Steven H. Hinrichs,et al.  Application of whole slide image markup and annotation for pathologist knowledge capture , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.

[10]  A. Janin,et al.  Stack or trash? Quality assessment of virtual slides , 2013, Diagnostic Pathology.

[11]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[12]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Engineering Complex Tissues , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[13]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  OpenSlide: A vendor-neutral software foundation for digital pathology , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.

[14]  Jean H D Fasel,et al.  Anatomy of the liver: an outline with three levels of complexity--a further step towards tailored territorial liver resections. , 2014, Journal of hepatology.

[15]  Travis E. Oliphant,et al.  Guide to NumPy , 2015 .

[16]  Georgios Gousios,et al.  Oops, My Tests Broke the Build: An Explorative Analysis of Travis CI with GitHub , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM 14th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR).