Attention control and susceptibility to hypnosis

[1]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  STANFORD HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY SCALE, FORM C , 2011 .

[2]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  The Simon effect with conventional signals: a time-course analysis. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[3]  Jason Tipples,et al.  Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  S. Brandt,et al.  Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Spatial coding and central patterns: is there something special about the eyes? , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[7]  Hongtu Zhu,et al.  Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  L. Sebastiani,et al.  Hypnotizability and spatial attentional functions. , 2007, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[10]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Attention to Arrows: Pointing to a New Direction , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  C. Iani,et al.  Hypnotic Suggestion Modulates Cognitive Conflict , 2006, Psychological science.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Neuroimaging and genetic associations of attentional and hypnotic processes , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[13]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application , 2006 .

[14]  I. Kirsch,et al.  Suggestion Reduces the Stroop Effect , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Hypnosis decouples cognitive control from conflict monitoring processes of the frontal lobe , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  Jin Fan,et al.  Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Rubichi,et al.  Hypnotic susceptibility, baseline attentional functioning, and the Stroop task , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[18]  Graham A. Jamieson,et al.  An empirical test of Woody and Bowers’s dissociated-control theory of hypnosis , 2004, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[19]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Hypnotic Susceptibility: Multidimensional Relationships With Cloninger’s Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, COMT Polymorphisms, Absorption, and Attentional Characteristics , 2004, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[20]  Amir Raz,et al.  Posthypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference under cycloplegia , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  U. Ansorge.  Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect , 2003, Psychological research.

[22]  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Individual Differences - New Perspectives , 2003 .

[23]  Jin Fan,et al.  Hypnotic suggestion and the modulation of Stroop interference. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[24]  J. Tipples.  Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic Control of Visual Attention , 2001, Psychological science.

[26]  R. Ebstein,et al.  Exploratory association study between catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) high/low enzyme activity polymorphism and hypnotizability. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[27]  H. Masaki,et al.  An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[28]  H. Nordby,et al.  Effects of Hypnotizability on Performance of a Stroop Task and Event-Related Potentials , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  John Gruzelier,et al.  A working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: a review of evidence , 1998 .

[30]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: a test of the frontal hypothesis. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift , 1997 .

[32]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  H. Crawford,et al.  Brain dynamics and hypnosis: attentional and disattentional processes. , 1994, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[34]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[35]  J. Laurence,et al.  Hypnotic susceptibility and verbal automaticity: automatic and strategic processing differences in the Stroop color-naming task. , 1992, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[36]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[37]  M. Nash,et al.  Contemporary hypnosis research , 1992 .

[38]  S. Kornblum.  Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. , 1992 .

[39]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  J. Laurence,et al.  Hypnotizability and automaticity: toward a parallel distributed processing model of hypnotic responding. , 1990, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[41]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[42]  M. Heap.  Hypnosis : current clinical, experimental and forensic practices , 1988 .

[43]  P. Sheehan,et al.  Strategy manipulation and the Stroop effect in hypnosis. , 1988, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[44]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. , 1981 .

[46]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[47]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[49]  G. S. Blum,et al.  The detection over time of subjects simulating hypnosis. , 1971, The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis.

[50]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.