An EEG-Based Biometric System Using Eigenvector Centrality in Resting State Brain Networks

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of brain activity for biometric systems. However, so far these studies have focused mainly on basic features of the Electroencephalography. In this study we propose an approach based on phase synchronization, to investigate personal distinctive brain network organization. To this end, the importance, in terms of centrality, of different regions was determined on the basis of EEG recordings. We hypothesized that nodal centrality enables the accurate identification of individuals. EEG signals from a cohort of 109 64-channels EEGs were band-pass filtered in the classical frequency bands and functional connectivity between the sensors was estimated using the Phase Lag Index. The resulting connectivity matrix was used to construct a weighted network, from which the nodal Eigenvector Centrality was computed. Nodal centrality was successively used as feature vector. Highest recognition rates were observed in the gamma band (equal error rate ( EER) = 0.044) and high beta band ( EER = 0.102). Slightly lower recognition rate was observed in the low beta band ( EER = 0.144), while poor recognition rates were observed for the others frequency bands. The reported results show that resting-state functional brain network topology provides better classification performance than using only a measure of functional connectivity, and may represent an optimal solution for the design of next generation EEG based biometric systems. This study also suggests that results from biometric systems based on high-frequency scalp EEG features should be interpreted with caution.

[1]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Modular and Hierarchically Modular Organization of Brain Networks , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  C. Stam,et al.  The organization of physiological brain networks , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Stam,et al.  Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometric recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[6]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[8]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Comparing Brain Networks of Different Size and Connectivity Density Using Graph Theory , 2010, PloS one.

[9]  Fabio Babiloni,et al.  Human Brain Distinctiveness Based on EEG Spectral Coherence Connectivity , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  C J Stam,et al.  The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Michele Nappi,et al.  NABS: Novel Approaches for Biometric Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[12]  Patrizio Campisi,et al.  Brain waves for automatic biometric-based user recognition , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[13]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: An atlas-based MEG beamformer solution , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Cognitive Dysfunction in Early Multiple Sclerosis: Altered Centrality Derived from Resting-State Functional Connectivity Using Magneto-Encephalography , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Eigenvector Centrality Mapping for Analyzing Connectivity Patterns in fMRI Data of the Human Brain , 2010, PloS one.

[17]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  High frequency spectral components after Secobarbital: The contribution of muscular origin—A study with MEG/EEG , 2012, Epilepsy Research.

[18]  Jonas Richiardi,et al.  Graph analysis of functional brain networks: practical issues in translational neuroscience , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Vangelis Sakkalis,et al.  Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[20]  J. W. Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Procedure For Automatic Classification Of EEG Genetic Variants , 1991, Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume 13: 1991.

[21]  S. Muthukumaraswamy High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[24]  I. Nelken,et al.  Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades , 2008, Neuron.

[25]  Matteo Fraschini,et al.  Brain network analysis of EEG functional connectivity during imagery hand movements. , 2013, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[26]  C. Stam,et al.  Heritability of “small‐world” networks in the brain: A graph theoretical analysis of resting‐state EEG functional connectivity , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[27]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  Natasha M. Maurits,et al.  Correlating the alpha rhythm to BOLD using simultaneous EEG/fMRI: Inter-subject variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  A New Measure of Centrality for Brain Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[30]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  E. Whitham,et al.  Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: Quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20Hz are contaminated by EMG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[33]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[35]  Frederik Barkhof,et al.  Brain network alterations in Alzheimer's disease measured by Eigenvector centrality in fMRI are related to cognition and CSF biomarkers , 2014, Human brain mapping.