Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad

In some countries across the globe, tropical forest cover is increasing. The national-scale reforestation of Vietnam since 1992 is assumed to contribute to this recovery. It is achieved, however, by the displacement of forest extraction to other countries on the order of 49 (34–70) M m3, or ≈39% of the regrowth of Vietnam's forests from 1987 to 2006. Approximately half of wood imports to Vietnam during this period were illegal. Leakage due to policies restricting forest exploitation and displacement due to growing domestic consumption and exports contributed respectively to an estimated 58% and 42% of total displacement. Exports of wood products from Vietnam also grew rapidly, amounting to 84% of the displacement, which is a remarkable feature of the forest transition in Vietnam. Attribution of the displacement and corresponding forest extraction to Vietnam, the source countries or the final consumers is thus debatable. Sixty-one percent of the regrowth in Vietnam was, thus, not associated with displacement abroad. Policies allocating credits to countries for reducing deforestation and forest degradation should monitor illegal timber trade and take into account the policy-induced leakage of wood extraction to other countries.

[1]  S. Hecht,et al.  Globalization, Forest Resurgence, and Environmental Politics in El Salvador , 2006 .

[2]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam , 2008 .

[3]  R. Walker Forest Transition: Without Complexity, Without Scale , 2008 .

[4]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  Economic Growth, Poverty, and Household Welfare in Vietnam , 2004 .

[5]  A. Schloenhardt The illegal trade in timber and timber products in the Asia-Pacific region , 2008 .

[6]  M.,et al.  ENERGY RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM , 2007 .

[7]  Henry S. Shryock,et al.  The Methods and Materials of Demography. , 1973 .

[8]  Bernardo B. N. Strassburg,et al.  Reducing emissions from deforestation - the "combined incentives" mechanism and empirical simulations. , 2009 .

[9]  R. Chazdon Beyond Deforestation: Restoring Forests and Ecosystem Services on Degraded Lands , 2008, Science.

[10]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Measuring transnational leakage of forest conservation , 2007 .

[11]  Jordi Roca,et al.  Do individual preferences explain the Environmental Kuznets curve , 2003 .

[12]  B. McCarl,et al.  Estimating Leakage from Forest Carbon Sequestration Programs , 2004, Land Economics.

[13]  Phan Sy Hieu The changing administration and role of forestry in the economy of Vietnam , 2004, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy.

[14]  Adam Fforde,et al.  From plan to market , 1996 .

[15]  Pamela A Matson,et al.  Agricultural Intensification: Will Land Spared from Farming be Land Spared for Nature? , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Richard G. Dudley,et al.  Modeling the effects of a log export ban in Indonesia , 2004 .

[17]  Louise Aukland,et al.  A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation , 2003 .

[18]  C. Kull,et al.  Tropical Forest Transitions and Globalization:Neo-Liberalism, Migration, Tourism, and International Conservation Agendas , 2007 .

[19]  H. Grau,et al.  Agriculture adjustment, land-use transition and protected areas in Northwestern Argentina. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  P. Ferraro,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Johan Eliasch Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: The Eliasch Review , 2008 .

[22]  Sandra Brown,et al.  Measuring leakage from carbon projects in open economies: a stop timber harvesting project in Bolivia as a case study , 2004 .

[23]  W. Laurance The Need to Cut China's Illegal Timber Imports , 2008, Science.

[24]  H. Grau,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on The influence of human demography and agriculture on natural systems in the Neotropics Globalization and Land-Use Transitions in Latin America , 2008 .

[25]  E. Lambin,et al.  Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts , 2008 .

[26]  R. Chazdon Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances , 2003 .

[27]  F. Putz,et al.  Improved Tropical Forest Management for Carbon Retention , 2008, PLoS biology.

[28]  Patrick B. Durst,et al.  Forests out of bounds : impacts and effectiveness of logging bans in natural forests in Asia-Pacific , 2001 .

[29]  S. Johnson Estimating the extent of illegal trade of tropical forest products , 2003 .

[30]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[32]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature , 2009 .

[33]  Stephen G. Perz Grand Theory and Context-Specificity in the Study of Forest Dynamics: Forest Transition Theory and Other Directions , 2007 .

[34]  A. Mather,et al.  The forest transition: a theoretical basis , 1998 .

[35]  P. McElwee You Say Illegal, I Say Legal , 2004 .

[36]  Trash or treasure ? Logging and mill residues in Asia and the Pacific , 2003 .

[37]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Aide Tm,et al.  Globalization, Migration, and Latin American Ecosystems , 2004, Science.

[39]  G. Asner,et al.  Land-Use Allocation Protects the Peruvian Amazon , 2007, Science.