Visual working memory influences the performance in virtual image–guided surgical intervention

BackgroundThis study addresses for the first time the relationship between working memory and performance measures in image-guided instrument navigation with Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) and GI Mentor II (a simulator for gastroendoscopy). In light of recent research on simulator training, it is now prime time to ask why in a search for mechanisms rather than show repeatedly that conventional curriculum for simulation training has effect.MethodsThe participants in this study were 28 Swedish medical students taking their course in basic surgery. Visual and verbal working memory span scores were assessed by a validated computer program (RoboMemo) and correlated with visual–spatial ability (MRT-A test), total flow experience (flow scale), mental strain (Borg scale), and performance scores in manipulation and diathermy (MD) using Procedicus MIST-VR and GI Mentor 11 (exercises 1 and 3).ResultsSignificant Pearson’s r correlations were obtained between visual working memory span scores for visual data link (a RoboMemo exercise) and movement economy (r = −0.417; p < 0.05), total time (r = −0.495; p < 0.01), and total score (r = −0.390; p < 0.05) using MIST-MD, as well as total time (r = −0.493; p < 0.05) and efficiency of screening (r = 0.469; p < 0.05) using GI Mentor 11 (exercise 1). Correlations also were found between visual working memory span scores in rotating data link (another RoboMemo exercise) and both total time (r = −0.467; p < 0.05) and efficiency of screening (r = −0.436; p < 0.05) using GI Mentor 11 (exercise 3). Significant Pearson’s r correlations also were found between visual–spatial ability scores and several performance scores for the MIST and GI Mentor II exercises.ConclusionsFindings for the first time demonstrate that visual working memory for surgical novices may be important for performance in virtual simulator training with two well-known and validated simulators.

[1]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  David C. Nagel,et al.  Human factors in aviation , 1988 .

[3]  N. Sevdalis,et al.  Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observedin the operating theatre , 2006, Ergonomics.

[4]  Anthony G. Gallagher,et al.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. , 2003 .

[5]  J C Bailar,et al.  Crossover and self-controlled designs in clinical research. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[7]  Ethan D Grober,et al.  Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. , 2003, Surgery.

[8]  L. Hedman,et al.  Objective assessment of visuospatial and psychomotor ability and flow of residents and senior endoscopists in simulated gastroscopy , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[9]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[11]  J. McGuigan,et al.  Objective Psychomotor Skills Assessment of Experienced, Junior, and Novice Laparoscopists with Virtual Reality , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  P. Ström,et al.  High-level visual-spatial ability for novices correlates with performance in a visual-spatial complex surgical simulator task , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Earl L. Wiener.  13 – Cockpit Automation , 1988 .

[15]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Training of Working Memory in Children With ADHD , 2002 .

[16]  Li Felländer-Tsai,et al.  Working memory and image guided surgical simulation. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[17]  E. Heath.  Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[18]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[19]  M. Peters,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 2003 .

[21]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Neural bases of learning and memory: functional neuroimaging evidence , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[22]  A. Baddeley.  Is working memory still working? , 2001, The American psychologist.

[23]  G. Borg.  Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[24]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working memory in humans: Neuropsychological evidence. , 1995 .

[25]  L. Hedman,et al.  Visuospatial skills and computer game experience influence the performance of virtual endoscopy , 2004, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[26]  P. Ström,et al.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Expertise, Cognitive Ability, and Age Effects on Pilot Communication , 2003 .

[28]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.