On odour tolerability criteria from odorant instrumental monitoring

At present one of the most accepted criteria for assessing tolerability for environmental odour impacts is based on a modelling approach that requires the characterizations of the odour flow rates from stationary sources, definition of both a digital terrain model of the studied area and of relevant meteorology during the considered period of time, so to provide an estimate of the areas where the number of hours exceeds specified hourly odour threshold (e.g. 1, 3 or 5 OUE). Often the 98th percentile of hourly peak odour concentration is considered at sensible receptors. In the case of complex odour sources or if the emitting entity is not collaborative, the experimental approach focused on receptor instrumental monitoring can provide a tool for the assessment of odour nuisance tolerability, so to foster or to force mitigation actions on odour emission sources. Since nowadays instruments allowing single (e.g. H2S monitoring instruments) or multiple (e.g. e-noses) odorant concentration monitoring are available, and they are often positioned at sensible receptors, experimental measurement of the exceedance of odour threshold can be provided, if consensus odour threshold values for the odorant are available. Also for the experimental approach, the 98th percentile of hourly odour concentration can be provided. A case study based on H2S monitoring is proposed; extension to e-noses application is possible, providing their active and efficient presence in the field 12 months a year. Pros and cons of different approaches and criteria will be discussed.

[1]  Pierluigi Barbieri,et al.  Urban BTEX Spatiotemporal Exposure Assessment by Chemometric Expertise , 2013, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution.

[2]  J. Fanlo,et al.  A New Method to Evaluate Odour Annoyance Potential , 2014 .

[3]  Pierluigi Barbieri,et al.  Small scale spatial gradients of outdoor and indoor benzene in proximity of an integrated steel plant. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Sabina Licen,et al.  Odor control map: Self organizing map built from electronic nose signals and integrated by different instrumental and sensorial data to obtain an assessment tool for real environmental scenarios , 2018, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

[5]  Pasquale Giungato,et al.  Improving recognition of odors in a waste management plant by using electronic noses with different technologies, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry/olfactometry and dynamic olfactometry , 2016 .

[6]  Davide Franco,et al.  A review of odour impact criteria in selected countries around the world. , 2017, Chemosphere.

[7]  P Barbieri,et al.  Detecting and characterising sources of persistent organic pollutants (PAHs and PCBs) in surface sediments of an industrialized area (harbour of Trieste, northern Adriatic Sea). , 2000, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[8]  Anna M. Fan,et al.  Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment , 2005 .

[9]  T. J. Freeman,et al.  Case Studies in the Use of Source Specific Odour Modelling Guidelines , 2010 .

[10]  Karl Ropkins,et al.  openair - An R package for air quality data analysis , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  P. Gabassi,et al.  Valutazione della qualità della vita e stress ossidativo in ambiente urbano limitrofo a insediamenti industriali , 2017 .

[12]  Aysen Muezzinoglu,et al.  Odor determination at wastewater collection systems: Olfactometry versus H2S analyses , 2007 .

[13]  Selena Sironi,et al.  Measuring odours in the environment vs. dispersion modelling: A review , 2013 .

[14]  Anne-Claude Romain,et al.  Instrumental odour monitoring: Actions for a new European standard , 2017, 2017 ISOCS/IEEE International Symposium on Olfaction and Electronic Nose (ISOEN).

[15]  J. Amoore,et al.  Odor as an ald to chemical safety: Odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution , 1983, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[16]  Ki-Hyun Kim,et al.  A comparative analysis of malodor samples between direct (olfactometry) and indirect (instrumental) methods , 2008 .

[17]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Fluorescence detection of sulfur dioxide in air at the parts per billion level. , 1974, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  U. Epa,et al.  Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance , 1997 .

[20]  Federico Cozzi,et al.  Toxic elements content in PM10 samples from a coastal area of the Northern Adriatic Sea , 2010 .

[21]  Stefan Tsakovski,et al.  Seasonal apportionment of the sources of ambient air particulates in the city of Trieste , 2010 .

[22]  Martin Piringer,et al.  Conversion of the chemical concentration of odorous mixtures into odour concentration and odour intensity: A comparison of methods , 2015, 1512.06557.