On the Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport in the sub-1 keV energy range.

PURPOSE The validity of "classic" Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of electron and positron transport at sub-1 keV energies is investigated in the context of quantum theory. METHODS Quantum theory dictates that uncertainties on the position and energy-momentum four-vectors of radiation quanta obey Heisenberg's uncertainty relation; however, these uncertainties are neglected in "classical" MC simulations of radiation transport in which position and momentum are known precisely. Using the quantum uncertainty relation and electron mean free path, the magnitudes of uncertainties on electron position and momentum are calculated for different kinetic energies; a validity bound on the classical simulation of electron transport is derived. RESULTS In order to satisfy the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, uncertainties of 5% must be assigned to position and momentum for 1 keV electrons in water; at 100 eV, these uncertainties are 17 to 20% and are even larger at lower energies. In gaseous media such as air, these uncertainties are much smaller (less than 1% for electrons with energy 20 eV or greater). CONCLUSIONS The classical Monte Carlo transport treatment is questionable for sub-1 keV electrons in condensed water as uncertainties on position and momentum must be large (relative to electron momentum and mean free path) to satisfy the quantum uncertainty principle. Simulations which do not account for these uncertainties are not faithful representations of the physical processes, calling into question the results of MC track structure codes simulating sub-1 keV electron transport. Further, the large difference in the scale at which quantum effects are important in gaseous and condensed media suggests that track structure measurements in gases are not necessarily representative of track structure in condensed materials on a micrometer or a nanometer scale.

[1]  Francis A. Cucinotta,et al.  Track-structure codes in radiation research , 2006 .

[2]  D. Emfietzoglou,et al.  Accurate Electron Inelastic Cross Sections and Stopping Powers for Liquid Water over the 0.1-10 keV Range Based on an Improved Dielectric Description of the Bethe Surface , 2007, Radiation research.

[3]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  A Monte Carlo track structure code for electrons (~10 eV-10 keV) and protons (~0.3-10 MeV) in water: partitioning of energy and collision events , 2000 .

[4]  S. Incerti,et al.  A free-parameter theoretical model for describing the electron elastic scattering in water in the Geant4 toolkit , 2009 .

[5]  C Villagrasa,et al.  Comparison of GEANT4 very low energy cross section models with experimental data in water. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  I. G. Kaplan,et al.  The delocalization of the energy of the ionizing radiation in a molecular medium and its radiation-chemical features , 1985 .

[7]  L. Sanche,et al.  Cross Sections for Low-Energy (1–100 eV) Electron Elastic and Inelastic Scattering in Amorphous Ice , 2003, Radiation research.

[8]  S. Wong,et al.  Quality control studies of 99mTc-labeled radiopharmaceuticals by high-performance liquid chromatography. , 1981, The international journal of applied radiation and isotopes.

[9]  Thomas Schürmann,et al.  A Closer Look at the Uncertainty Relation of Position and Momentum , 2008, 0811.2582.

[10]  Hooshang Nikjoo,et al.  The Effect of Model Approximations on Single-Collision Distributions of Low-Energy Electrons in Liquid Water , 2005, Radiation research.

[11]  M. Zaider,et al.  Indirect effects in dual radiation action , 1988 .

[12]  P. Kliauga,et al.  Measurement of Single Event Energy Deposition Spectra at 5 nm to 250 nm Simulated Site Sizes , 1990 .

[13]  J. Sempau,et al.  PENELOPE-2006: A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport , 2009 .

[14]  M. Inokuti,et al.  Radiation-energy partition among mixture components: Current ideas on an old question☆ , 1988 .

[15]  J. Baró,et al.  An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of coupled electron-photon transport , 1997 .