Sensor fusion and estimation strategies for data traffic reduction in rooted wireless sensor networks

One of the main issues with wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is communication efficiency to reduce power consumption. This is often achieved through data routing with aggregation. However, aggregation does not consider possible measurements correlation. This a priori information can be used for data fusion, in order to remove correlation of transmitted data, thus reducing amount of information to be transmitted. In this paper we explore different information processing strategy for state estimation of dynamic linear systems in the context of rooted wireless sensor networks. We propose three data fusion methods: standard measurement aggregation, measurement fusion, and fusion of partial state estimates. These strategies are specifically designed to include possible delayed or dropped packets. Finally, they are compared in term of power consumption efficiency, estimation accuracy, computational and memory complexity, showing tradeoffs between these metrics.

[1]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence and asymptotic agreement in distributed decision problems , 1982 .

[2]  Yunmin Zhu,et al.  Optimal update with out-of-sequence measurements , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Demosthenis Teneketzis,et al.  Further results on the asymptotic agreement problem , 1988 .

[4]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Filtering , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Approximate distributed Kalman filtering in sensor networks with quantifiable performance , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[6]  N. A. Carlson Federated square root filter for decentralized parallel processors , 1990 .

[7]  Ruggero Carli,et al.  Distributed Kalman filtering based on consensus strategies , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  A. Willsky,et al.  Combining and updating of local estimates and regional maps along sets of one-dimensional tracks , 1982 .

[9]  T. Chang Comments on "Computation and transmission requirements for a decentralized linear-quadratic-Gaussian control" , 1980 .

[10]  Michael Athans,et al.  Convergence and asymptotic agreement in distributed decision problems , 1982, 1982 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Jason L. Speyer,et al.  A low-power filtering scheme for distributed sensor networks , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[12]  Jason Speyer,et al.  Computation and transmission requirements for a decentralized linear-quadratic-Gaussian control problem , 1978, 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[13]  Luca Schenato,et al.  Optimal sensor fusion for distributed sensors subject to random delay and packet loss , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  V. Borkar,et al.  Asymptotic agreement in distributed estimation , 1982 .

[15]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  One-step solution for the multistep out-of-sequence-measurement problem in tracking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[16]  Huimin Chen,et al.  One-step solution for the general out-of-sequence-measurement problem in tracking , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[17]  Michele Pavon,et al.  A general hankel-norm approximation scheme for linear recursive filtering , 1990, Autom..