HRM, Communication, Satisfaction, and Perceived Performance

Employee perceptions of HR practices are often assumed to play an important mediating role in the relationship between HR systems and HR outcomes. In a multisource, multilevel study of 2,063 employees and 449 managers in 119 branches of a single large firm, the authors tested how managers’ perceptions of the HR practices implemented in the unit relate to employee perceptions of these HR practices. The authors’ main aim is to explore managers’ communication quality as a moderator of the relationship between manager-rated and employee-rated HR practices. They also tested whether perceived human resource management (HRM) perceptions in turn relate to perceived unit performance and satisfaction. Multilevel structural equation modeling analyses showed that HRM perceptions mediated the relationship between implemented HRM and both satisfaction and unit performance and that communication moderated the relationship between manager-rated and employee-rated HRM. These findings contribute to scholars’ understanding of how HRM affects employee-related outcomes.

[1]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract , 1994 .

[2]  David Guest,et al.  Human resource management - the workers' verdict , 1999 .

[3]  M. Zollo,et al.  Interest alignment and competitive advantage , 2007 .

[4]  Joanne D. Martin,et al.  Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis. , 1983 .

[5]  K. Legge Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[6]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[7]  Rebecca R. Kehoe,et al.  The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors , 2013 .

[8]  P. Hanges,et al.  Survivor reactions to reorganization: antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Carl F. Fey,et al.  The effect of human resource management practices on Japanese MNC subsidiary performance: a partial mediating model , 2003 .

[11]  Charlotte R. Gerstner,et al.  Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues , 1997 .

[12]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects , 2010 .

[13]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATION, EMPOWERMENT, AND SKILL‐ENHANCING PRACTICES ON AGGREGATE VOLUNTARY TURNOVER: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF COLLECTIVE AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT , 2011 .

[14]  Susan Cartwright,et al.  The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism , 2006 .

[15]  Susan S. White,et al.  Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  S. Jackson,et al.  Linking Competitive Strategies with Human Resource Management Practices , 1987 .

[17]  R. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences , 2003 .

[18]  T. Judge,et al.  The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  D. Guest Human Resource Management, Corporate Performance and Employee Wellbeing: Building the Worker into HRM , 2002 .

[20]  John Paul Macduffie Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[21]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[22]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communicator Competence in the Workplace: Model Testing and Scale Development , 1981 .

[24]  Riki Takeuchi,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Mechanisms Mediating between High-Performance Work Systems and the Performance of Japanese Organizations , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  MANAGING CUSTOMER SERVICES: HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, QUIT RATES, AND SALES GROWTH , 2002 .

[26]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  The strategic management of people in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and extension , 2001 .

[27]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[28]  Cheri Ostroff The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[29]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[30]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[31]  S. A. Simmons,et al.  Motivating Language in Industry , 2006 .

[32]  David P. Lepak,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION , 2008 .

[33]  Timothy A. Judge,et al.  The Role of Human Resource Systems in Job Applicant Decision Processes , 1994 .

[34]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment , 2011 .

[35]  D. Hofmann An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[36]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness , 2004 .

[37]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[38]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[40]  David P. Lepak,et al.  THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS OF A SOCIAL SYSTEM: CROSS‐LEVEL EFFECTS OF HIGH‐PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS ON EMPLOYEES’ ATTITUDES , 2009 .

[41]  John E. Delery Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research , 1998 .

[42]  Robert M. Verburg,et al.  Configurations of human resource management practices: a model and test of internal fit , 2007 .

[43]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Alternative Methods for Assessing Mediation in Multilevel Data: The Advantages of Multilevel SEM , 2011 .

[44]  L. Dyer,et al.  Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? , 1995 .

[45]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[46]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[47]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[48]  Marcel A. Croon,et al.  The relationships between team learning activities and team performance , 2009 .

[49]  John P. Campbell,et al.  JOB SATISFACTION: ARE ALL THE PARTS THERE? , 1983 .

[50]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction , 2001 .

[51]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[52]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[53]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[54]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Human resource strategy: formulation, implementation, and impact , 2001 .

[55]  David A Spencer,et al.  Changes in HRM and job satisfaction, 1998–2004: evidence from the Workplace Employment Relations Survey , 2008 .

[56]  Paul E. Madlock The Link Between Leadership Style, Communicator Competence, and Employee Satisfaction , 2008 .

[57]  Garry A. Gelade,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management and Work Climate on Organizational Performance , 2003 .

[58]  Sankalp Chaturvedi,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Power Distance in the Relationship Between High Performance Work Systems and Employee Attitudes: A Multilevel Perspective , 2009 .

[59]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[60]  Clint Chadwick,et al.  Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[61]  J. Lawler,et al.  Organizational and HRM Strategies in Korea: Impact on Firm Performance in an Emerging Economy , 2000 .

[62]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[63]  Gloria Harrell-Cook,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off , 2001 .

[64]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[65]  Deanne N. Den Hartog,et al.  Future directions in performance management , 2004 .

[66]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[67]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[68]  James W. Walker,et al.  Human Resource Strategy , 1992 .

[69]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  When a "happy" worker is really a "productive" worker: A review and further refinement of the happy-productive worker thesis. , 2001 .

[70]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[71]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[72]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  P. Wright,et al.  Variability Within Organizations: Implications for Strategic Human Resource Management , 2007 .

[74]  B. Schneider,et al.  Organizational climate and culture. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[75]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[76]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  Performance management: A model and research agenda , 2004 .

[77]  Michael T. Watkins Principles of Persuasion , 2001 .

[78]  J. Guthrie High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[79]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[80]  P. Boxall The Strategic Hrm Debate and the Resource‐Based View of the Firm , 1996 .

[81]  L. Porter,et al.  Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off? , 1997 .