Modular System for Shelves and Coasts (MOSSCO v1.0) – a flexible and multi-component framework for coupled coastal ocean ecosystem modelling

Abstract. Shelf and coastal sea processes extend from the atmosphere through the water column and into the seabed. These processes reflect intimate interactions between physical, chemical, and biological states on multiple scales. As a consequence, coastal system modelling requires a high and flexible degree of process and domain integration; this has so far hardly been achieved by current model systems. The lack of modularity and flexibility in integrated models hinders the exchange of data and model components and has historically imposed the supremacy of specific physical driver models. We present the Modular System for Shelves and Coasts (MOSSCO; http://www.mossco.de ), a novel domain and process coupling system tailored but not limited to the coupling challenges of and applications in the coastal ocean. MOSSCO builds on the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF) and on the Framework for Aquatic Biogeochemical Models (FABM). It goes beyond existing technologies by creating a unique level of modularity in both domain and process coupling, including a clear separation of component and basic model interfaces, flexible scheduling of several tens of models, and facilitation of iterative development at the lab and the station and on the coastal ocean scale. MOSSCO is rich in metadata and its concepts are also applicable outside the coastal domain. For coastal modelling, it contains dozens of example coupling configurations and tested set-ups for coupled applications. Thus, MOSSCO addresses the technology needs of a growing marine coastal Earth system community that encompasses very different disciplines, numerical tools, and research questions.

[1]  R. Margalef,et al.  On Certain Unifying Principles in Ecology , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Paolo Lazzari,et al.  Development of BFMCOUPLER (v1.0), the coupling scheme that links the MITgcm and BFM models for ocean biogeochemistry simulations , 2016 .

[3]  Kai W. Wirtz,et al.  The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic primary productivity in the southern North Sea , 2017, Hydrobiologia.

[4]  I. Hense,et al.  Modeling the Role of pH on Baltic Sea Cyanobacteria , 2015, Life.

[5]  Ralph S. Dunlap.  Effective reuse of coupling technologies for Earth System Models , 2013 .

[6]  Beate Geyer,et al.  High-resolution atmospheric reconstruction for Europe 1948–2012: coastDat2 , 2013 .

[7]  Scott D. Peckham.  The CSDMS Standard Names: Cross-Domain Naming Conventions for Describing Process Models, Data Sets and Their Associated Variables , 2014 .

[8]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Modelling the Caspian Sea and its catchment area using a coupled regional atmosphere-ocean model (RegCM4-ROMS): model design and preliminary results , 2012 .

[9]  Chris Hill,et al.  MAPL: a high-level programming paradigm to support more rapid and robust encoding of hierarchical trees of interacting high-performance components , 2007, CompFrame '07.

[10]  Russ Rew,et al.  NetCDF: an interface for scientific data access , 1990, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[11]  Kai W. Wirtz,et al.  The acclimative biogeochemical model of the southern North Sea , 2017 .

[12]  Olivier Aumont,et al.  PISCES-v2: an ocean biogeochemical model for carbon and ecosystem studies , 2015 .

[13]  M. H. Nasermoaddeli,et al.  A model study on the large-scale effect of macrofauna on the suspended sediment concentration in a shallow shelf sea , 2017, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science.

[14]  Leo H. Holthuijsen,et al.  Generalized Shallow Water Wave Growth from Lake George , 2007 .

[15]  Katsuhide Yokoyama,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability of phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-a) in relation to salinity, suspended sediment concentration, and light intensity in a macrotidal estuary , 2016 .

[16]  Dorian Krause,et al.  JURECA: General-purpose supercomputer at Jülich Supercomputing Centre , 2016 .

[17]  Ronald,et al.  GFDL’s ESM2 Global Coupled Climate–Carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical Formulation and Baseline Simulation Characteristics , 2012 .

[18]  S. Manabe.  CLIMATE AND THE OCEAN CIRCULATION: II. THE ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION AND THE EFFECT OF HEAT TRANSFER BY OCEAN CURRENTS , 1969 .

[19]  Jean-Marie Beckers,et al.  Non-uniform adaptive vertical grids for 3D numerical ocean models , 2010 .

[20]  Corinna Schrum,et al.  Simulating long-term dynamics of the coupled North Sea and Baltic Sea ecosystem with ECOSMO II: Model description and validation , 2013 .

[21]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  The 1-way on-line coupled atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n) - Part 2: On-line coupling with the Multi-Model-Driver (MMD) , 2012 .

[22]  Steve Easterbrook,et al.  The software architecture of climate models: a graphical comparison of CMIP5 and EMICAR5 configurations , 2015 .

[23]  M. Schartau,et al.  Estuary-type circulation as a factor sustaining horizontal nutrient gradients in freshwater-influenced coastal systems , 2017, Geo-Marine Letters.

[24]  Andreas Meister,et al.  Description of a flexible and extendable physical–biogeochemical model system for the water column , 2006 .

[25]  J. Lovelock,et al.  Atmospheric homeostasis by and for the biosphere: the gaia hypothesis , 1974 .

[26]  S. Valcke,et al.  The OASIS3 coupler: a European climate modelling community software , 2012 .

[27]  Sophie Valcke,et al.  Development and performance of a new version of the OASIS coupler , OASIS 3-MCT _ 3 . 0 , 2017 .

[28]  T Black,et al.  THE EARTH SYSTEM PREDICTION SUITE: Toward a Coordinated U.S. Modeling Capability. , 2016, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[29]  Luuk P. A. van Gerven,et al.  FABM-PCLake – linking aquatic ecology with hydrodynamics , 2016 .

[30]  Knut Klingbeil,et al.  Implementation of a direct nonhydrostatic pressure gradient discretisation into a layered ocean model , 2013 .

[31]  N. Knowlton,et al.  Marine Ecosystem-based Management in Practice: Scientific and Governance Challenges , 2008 .

[32]  Ina Lorkowski,et al.  Interannual variability of carbon fluxes in the North Sea from 1970 to 2006-Competing effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on the gas-exchange of CO2 , 2012 .

[33]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Modular Earth Submodel System (messy) – a New Approach towards Earth System Modeling , 2022 .

[34]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  The 1-way on-line coupled atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n) – Part 1: Description of the limited-area atmospheric chemistry model COSMO/MESSy , 2012 .

[35]  Knut Klingbeil,et al.  Advantages of vertically adaptive coordinates in numerical models of stratified shelf seas , 2015 .

[36]  I. Harms.  Water mass transformation in the Barents Sea — application of the Hamburg Shelf Ocean Model (HamSOM) , 1997 .

[37]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2) , 2010 .

[38]  B. Bayne,et al.  Feeding behaviour of the mussel, Mytilus edulis: responses to variations in quantity and organic content of the seston , 1993, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[39]  J. Wondolleck,et al.  Marine Ecosystem-Based Management in Practice: Different Pathways, Common Lessons , 2017 .

[40]  Trevor Tolhurst,et al.  Destabilization of Cohesive Intertidal Sediments by Infauna , 2001 .

[41]  Peter M. J. Herman,et al.  Dynamic response of deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: A model , 1996 .

[42]  Cecelia DeLuca,et al.  The architecture of the Earth System Modeling Framework , 2003, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[43]  Julian Icarus Allen,et al.  ERSEM 15.06: a generic model for marine biogeochemistry and the ecosystem dynamics of the lower trophic levels , 2015 .

[44]  J. Bruggeman,et al.  Bottom RedOx Model (BROM v.1.1): a coupled benthic–pelagic model for simulation of water and sediment biogeochemistry , 2017 .

[45]  U. Gräwe,et al.  A direct comparison of a depth-dependent Radiation stress formulation and a Vortex force formulation within a three-dimensional coastal ocean model , 2013 .

[46]  Sophie Valcke,et al.  Development and performance of a new version of the OASIS coupler, OASIS3-MCT_3.0 , 2017 .

[47]  Valeria Di Biagio,et al.  Development of BFMCOUPLER ( v 1 . 0 ) , the coupling scheme that links the MITgcm and BFM models for ocean biogeochemistry simulations , 2016 .

[48]  Venkatramani Balaji,et al.  Coarse-grained component concurrency in Earth system modeling: parallelizing atmospheric radiative transfer in the GFDL AM3 model using the Flexible Modeling System coupling framework , 2016 .

[49]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[50]  R. He,et al.  Development of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) Modeling System , 2010 .

[51]  Ulrike Feudel,et al.  Modeling flocculation processes : intercomparison of a size class-based model and a distribution-based model , 2011 .

[52]  A. Tansley.  The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms , 1935 .

[53]  Eric Deleersnijder,et al.  Application of modified Patankar schemes to stiff biogeochemical models for the water column , 2005 .

[54]  Burchard Hans,et al.  GETM, a General Estuarine Transport Model , 2002 .

[55]  Jim Shore,et al.  Fail Fast , 2004, IEEE Softw..

[56]  Philip W. Jones.  First- and Second-Order Conservative Remapping Schemes for Grids in Spherical Coordinates , 1999 .

[57]  Ben van Werkhoven,et al.  The Oceanographic Multipurpose Software Environment (OMUSE v1.0) , 2017 .

[58]  H. Fang,et al.  Biofilm effects on size gradation, drag coefficient and settling velocity of sediment particles , 2014 .

[59]  Spencer Rugaber,et al.  A feature model of coupling technologies for Earth System Models , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[60]  Leo C. van Rijn,et al.  Unified View of Sediment Transport by Currents and Waves. II: Suspended Transport , 2007 .

[61]  O. Kerimoglu,et al.  Autotrophic Stoichiometry Emerging from Optimality and Variable Co-limitation , 2016, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[62]  John C. Warner,et al.  Using the Model Coupling Toolkit to couple earth system models , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[64]  Karsten Bolding,et al.  A general framework for aquatic biogeochemical models , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[65]  Emmanuel Partheniades,et al.  Erosion and Deposition of Cohesive Soils , 1965 .

[66]  Carsten Lemmen,et al.  The Benthic Geoecology Model Within The Modular System For Shelves And Coasts (MOSSCO) , 2014 .

[67]  Scott D. Peckham,et al.  A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: The design of CSDMS , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[68]  P Cazenave,et al.  Unstructured grid modelling of offshore wind farm impacts on seasonally stratified shelf seas , 2016 .

[69]  Zhi Liang,et al.  Gridspec: A standard for the description of grids used in Earth System models , 2019, 1911.08638.

[70]  G. Sannino,et al.  Validation of newly designed regional earth system model (RegESM) for Mediterranean Basin , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[71]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[72]  H R A Jagers,et al.  Linking Data, Models and Tools: An Overview , 2010 .

[73]  B. Ahrens,et al.  New coupled atmosphere-ocean-ice system COSMO-CLM/NEMO: assessing air temperature sensitivity over the North and Baltic Seas , 2014 .

[74]  G. Zängl,et al.  The ICON (ICOsahedral Non‐hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI‐M: Description of the non‐hydrostatic dynamical core , 2015 .

[75]  Cecelia DeLuca,et al.  Toward self-describing and workflow integrated Earth system models: A coupled atmosphere-ocean modeling system application , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[76]  Paul B. de Laat,et al.  Governance of open source software: state of the art , 2007 .

[77]  O. Kerimoglu,et al.  A novel acclimative biogeochemical model and its implementation tothe southern North Sea , 2017 .