Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing

The stiffness sensing ability is required to respond to the stiffness of the matrix. Here we determined whether normal cells and cancer cells display distinct mechanical phenotypes. Cancer cells were softer than their normal counterparts, regardless of the type of cancer (breast, bladder, cervix, pancreas, or Ha-RasV12-transformed cells). When cultured on matrices of varying stiffness, low stiffness decreased proliferation in normal cells, while cancer cells and transformed cells lost this response. Thus, cancer cells undergo a change in their mechanical phenotype that includes cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing. Caveolin-1, which is suppressed in many tumor cells and in oncogene-transformed cells, regulates the mechanical phenotype. Caveolin-1-upregulated RhoA activity and Y397FAK phosphorylation directed actin cap formation, which was positively correlated with cell elasticity and stiffness sensing in fibroblasts. Ha-RasV12-induced transformation and changes in the mechanical phenotypes were reversed by re-expression of caveolin-1 and mimicked by the suppression of caveolin-1 in normal fibroblasts. This is the first study to describe this novel role for caveolin-1, linking mechanical phenotype to cell transformation. Furthermore, mechanical characteristics may serve as biomarkers for cell transformation.

[1]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Differential Matrix Rigidity Response in Breast Cancer Cell Lines Correlates with the Tissue Tropism , 2009, PloS one.

[2]  J. Ohayon,et al.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[3]  M. Tang,et al.  Soft substrate induces apoptosis by the disturbance of Ca2+ homeostasis in renal epithelial LLC‐PK1 cells , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[4]  Mikala Egeblad,et al.  Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling , 2009, Cell.

[5]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening , 2009, Current Biology.

[6]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[7]  V. Rizzo,et al.  Participation of caveolae in beta‐1 integrin‐mediated mechanotransduction , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  M. Chiquet,et al.  Role of the actin cytoskeleton in tuning cellular responses to external mechanical stress , 2009, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[9]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Multiple roles of alpha-smooth muscle actin in mechanotransduction. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[10]  Hsien-Chang Chang,et al.  Deregulation of AP-1 Proteins in Collagen Gel-induced Epithelial Cell Apoptosis Mediated by Low Substratum Rigidity* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Abhishek Kumar,et al.  The regulation of dynamic mechanical coupling between actin cytoskeleton and nucleus by matrix geometry. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[12]  Wei Lu,et al.  Live-cell subcellular measurement of cell stiffness using a microengineered stretchable micropost array membrane. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[13]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[14]  I. Nabi,et al.  Concerted regulation of focal adhesion dynamics by galectin-3 and tyrosine-phosphorylated caveolin-1 , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  A. Yap,et al.  A mechanobiological perspective on cadherins and the actin-myosin cytoskeleton , 2013, F1000prime reports.

[16]  B. Honig,et al.  Coaction of intercellular adhesion and cortical tension specifies tissue surface tension , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  M. Tang,et al.  Regulation of proximal tubular cell differentiation and proliferation in primary culture by matrix stiffness and ECM components. , 2014, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[18]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[19]  M. Tang,et al.  Mechanosensing machinery for cells under low substratum rigidity. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[20]  P. ten Dijke,et al.  The tumor suppressor Smad4 is required for transforming growth factor beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and bone metastasis of breast cancer cells. , 2006, Cancer research.

[21]  James K Gimzewski,et al.  AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[22]  D. Postma,et al.  Caveolin-1 controls airway epithelial barrier function. Implications for asthma. , 2013, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[23]  P. Hordijk,et al.  A model for phospho-caveolin-1-driven turnover of focal adhesions , 2011, Cell adhesion & migration.

[24]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[25]  M. Lisanti,et al.  Caveolin-1 expression inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin/Lef-1 signaling by recruiting beta-catenin to caveolae membrane domains. , 2000, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  P. Arratia,et al.  Absence of filamin A prevents cells from responding to stiffness gradients on gels coated with collagen but not fibronectin. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Alan Hall,et al.  The cytoskeleton and cancer , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[28]  M. Yeh,et al.  The Influence of Physical and Physiological Cues on Atomic Force Microscopy-Based Cell Stiffness Assessment , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Inke Näthke,et al.  Cell polarity in development and cancer , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  M. Colombo,et al.  Caveolin-1 reduces osteosarcoma metastases by inhibiting c-Src activity and met signaling. , 2007, Cancer research.

[31]  F. Byfield,et al.  Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[33]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[34]  Baohua Yang,et al.  p190 RhoGTPase-Activating Protein Links the &bgr;1 Integrin/Caveolin-1 Mechanosignaling Complex to RhoA and Actin Remodeling , 2011, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[35]  Ravi A. Desai,et al.  Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates , 2010, Nature Methods.

[36]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[37]  M. Lisanti,et al.  Caveolin-1 Expression Inhibits Wnt/β-Catenin/Lef-1 Signaling by Recruiting β-Catenin to Caveolae Membrane Domains* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  Daniel Gioeli,et al.  Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype , 2010, PloS one.

[39]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Actin cap associated focal adhesions and their distinct role in cellular mechanosensing , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[40]  F. Sotgia,et al.  Caveolin-1 promotes pancreatic cancer cell differentiation and restores membranous E-cadherin via suppression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition , 2011, Cell cycle.

[41]  D. Wirtz,et al.  The multi-faceted role of the actin cap in cellular mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. , 2013, Soft matter.

[42]  M. Lisanti,et al.  Caveolin-1 in oncogenic transformation, cancer, and metastasis. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[43]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Matrix rigidity regulates a switch between TGF-β1–induced apoptosis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  Expression of matrix proteins in uterine cervical neoplasia using immunohistochemistry. , 1998, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[45]  Quan-mei Sun,et al.  Substrate stiffness influences the outcome of antitumor drug screening in vitro. , 2013, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.

[46]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Mechanisms of mechanical signaling in development and disease , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[47]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[48]  Dihua Yu,et al.  Cancer cell stiffness: integrated roles of three-dimensional matrix stiffness and transforming potential. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[49]  H. Izumi,et al.  Oncogenic Ras-induced morphologic change is through MEK/ERK signaling pathway to downregulate Stat3 at a posttranslational level in NIH3T3 cells. , 2008, Neoplasia.

[50]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Measurement and analysis of traction force dynamics in response to vasoactive agonists. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[52]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[53]  D. Tschumperlin,et al.  Matrix stiffness reverses the effect of actomyosin tension on cell proliferation , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[54]  K. Maniar,et al.  Pathology of Cervical Carcinoma , 2016 .

[55]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[56]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Matrix Stiffness: A Regulator of Cellular Behavior and Tissue Formation , 2012 .