Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects.

The purpose of the experiments reported was to examine how novel, three-dimensional shapes are represented in long-term memory and how this might be differentially affected by monocular and binocular viewing. Three experiments were conducted. The first experiment established that slide projections of the novel objects could be recognized readily if seen in the same orientation as seen during learning. The second and third experiments examined generalization to novel depth rotations of the objects. The second experiment used slide projections of the objects. The results indicated that the representation of the objects seen during training was quite viewpoint-specific as recognition of objects in novel orientations was relatively poor. In the third experiment subjects were shown the real objects under monocular or binocular viewing. Overall, the results are consistent with a growing body of recent research showing that, at least under certain conditions, the visual system stores viewpoint-specific representations of objects.

[1]  W. Epstein,et al.  The Process of ‘Taking-into-Account’ in Visual Perception , 1973, Perception.

[2]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  G Hatfield,et al.  Functional equivalence of masking and cue reduction in perception of shape at a slant , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[6]  I. Rock The Logic of Perception , 1983 .

[7]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Coordinate systems in the long-term memory representation of three-dimensional shapes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to Object Constancy: Implications from Neurological Impairments of Object Constancy , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[9]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[10]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[11]  P. Jolicoeur A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[12]  I. Rock,et al.  A case of viewer-centered object perception , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computational processes in human vision : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1988 .

[14]  M. Corballis Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Orientation dependence in three-dimensional object recognition , 1989 .

[17]  I. Rock,et al.  Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Mj Farah,et al.  Reference frames and geometric primitives in object recognition , 1990 .

[19]  Hh Bülthoff Recognizing objects from novel viewpoints , 1990 .

[20]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[21]  M. Tarr,et al.  When does Human Object Recognition use a Viewer-Centered Reference Frame? , 1990 .

[22]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Identification of Disoriented Objects: A Dual‐systems Theory , 1990 .

[23]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Visual Object Representation: Interpreting Neurophysiological Data within a Computational Framework , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 1991, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  Hh Bülthoff,et al.  Mapping the generalization space in object recognition , 1991 .

[26]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  I Biederman,et al.  Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[29]  G K Humphrey,et al.  An Examination of the Effects of Axis Foreshortening, Monocular Depth Cues, and Visual Field on Object Identification , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.