Effect of stimulation sites on the performance of electromagnetic middle ear implant: A finite element analysis

Electromagnetic middle ear implants (MEIs), which use the mechanical vibration of their implanted transducers to treat hearing loss, have emerged to overcome the limitations of conventional hearing aids. Several reports have indicated that the electromagnetic MEI's performance changed with different stimulation sites of the transducer. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the transducers' stimulation sites on the electromagnetic MEIs' performance. To aid this investigation, a human ear finite-element model was developed from micro-CT images of an adult's right ear. The validity of the model was confirmed by comparing the model-derived results with experimental data. Then, stimulation forces, which simulate ideal electromagnetic transducers, were respectively applied at five typical coupling sites: the umbo, incus body, incus long process, the round window, and the stapes. The stimulation sites' influence on the electromagnetic MEI's performance was studied by analyzing their corresponding basilar membrane displacements. The results show that stimulation of the round window with a force produces more cochlear stimulation than equal force stimulation of the umbo, incus body, incus long process and the stapes, though the superiority of the round window depends on its smaller area compared to the stapes footplate. Among the forward stimulation, the stapes is the optimal stimulation site for the electromagnetic transducer regarding its hearing compensation's efficiency. The performance of the umbo stimulation is comparable to that of the incus-long-process stimulation. Driving the incus body is less efficient than stimulating the other forward driving sites. Additional, using the stapes response to evaluate the forward stimulation gives results similar to those deduced by the basilar membrane response; in contrast, for the round-window stimulation, the evaluation result based on the stapes response is prominently less than the one calculated by the basilar membrane response, especially in the mid-high frequency range.

[1]  Qunli Sun,et al.  Acoustic-structural coupled finite element analysis for sound transmission in human ear--pressure distributions. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Rong Z. Gan,et al.  Modeling of Sound Transmission from Ear Canal to Cochlea , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Measurements of stapes velocity in live human ears , 2009, Hearing Research.

[4]  S. Puria,et al.  Human ossicular-joint flexibility transforms the peak amplitude and width of impulsive acoustic stimulia) , 2018, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Sound-pressure measurements in the cochlear vestibule of human-cadaver ears. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Xiangming Zhang,et al.  A Comprehensive Model of Human Ear for Analysis of Implantable Hearing Devices , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Rosowski,et al.  Limits on normal cochlear ‘third’ windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear , 2017, Hearing Research.

[8]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: Comparison of different coupling methods , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Yuan-Fang Chou,et al.  The development of a non-surgical direct drive hearing device with a wireless actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane , 2013 .

[10]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Performance considerations of prosthetic actuators for round-window stimulation , 2010, Hearing Research.

[12]  Sunil Puria,et al.  The EarLens system: New sound transduction methods , 2010, Hearing Research.

[13]  Jin-Ho Cho,et al.  Design and Development of a Tri-Coil Bellows Transducer for RW-Drive Implantable Middle-Ear Hearing Aid Using FEA , 2018, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[14]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  The Influence of the Mechanical Behaviour of the Middle Ear Ligaments: A Finite Element Analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  Gang Cheng,et al.  Concept and Evaluation of a New Piezoelectric Transducer for an Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device , 2017, Sensors.

[16]  Takuji Koike,et al.  Modeling of the human middle ear using the finite-element method. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Rong Z. Gan,et al.  Mass Loading on the Ossicles and Middle Ear Function , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[18]  Sekwang Park,et al.  Design and analysis of a microelectromagnetic vibration transducer used as an implantable middle ear hearing aid , 2002 .

[19]  Jin-Ho Cho,et al.  Design of differential electromagnetic transducer for implantable middle ear hearing device using finite element method , 2006 .

[20]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea , 2013, Hearing Research.

[21]  R. N. Natal Jorge,et al.  The human otitis media with effusion: a numerical-based study , 2017, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[22]  Tian-Yu Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head , 2017, Hearing Research.

[23]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Basilar membrane and osseous spiral lamina motion in human cadavers with air and bone conduction stimuli , 2003, Hearing Research.

[24]  A. Eiber,et al.  Contribution of the incudo-malleolar joint to middle-ear sound transmission , 2015, Hearing Research.

[25]  Saumil N Merchant,et al.  Evaluation of Round Window Stimulation Using the Floating Mass Transducer by Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Human Temporal Bones , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[26]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  The physics of hearing: fluid mechanics and the active process of the inner ear , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[27]  Jin-Ho Cho,et al.  Acoustic stimulation on the round window for active middle ear implants , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[28]  Xuelin Wang,et al.  A totally implantable hearing system – Design and function characterization in 3D computational model and temporal bones , 2010, Hearing Research.

[29]  T. Gundersen,et al.  A study of the vibration of the basilar membrane in human temporal bone preparations by the use of the Mössbauer effect. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[30]  J. Rosowski,et al.  Impedances of the inner and middle ear estimated from intracochlear sound pressures in normal human temporal bones , 2018, Hearing Research.

[31]  S. Elliott,et al.  Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation , 2016, Hearing Research.

[32]  G. Cheng,et al.  Transducer Type and Design Influence on the Hearing Loss Compensation Behaviour of the Electromagnetic Middle Ear Implant in a Finite Element Analysis , 2014 .

[33]  H Wada,et al.  Analysis of dynamic behavior of human middle ear using a finite-element method. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Differential Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  W. Affane,et al.  A microminiature electromagnetic middle-ear implant hearing device , 1995 .

[36]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Human temporal bones versus mechanical model to evaluate three middle ear transducers. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[37]  W H Ko,et al.  Engineering principles applied to implantable otologic devices. , 2001, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[38]  M. Barbara,et al.  Is the Human Round Window Really Round? An Anatomic Study With Surgical Implications , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[39]  Houguang Liu,et al.  Influence of ossicular chain malformation on the performance of round-window stimulation: A finite element approach , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[40]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear’s response to sound: Evidence for a flexible ossicular chain , 2005, Hearing Research.

[41]  H. Wada,et al.  A new electromagnetic hearing aid using lightweight coils to vibrate the ossicles , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[42]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Human middle-ear sound transfer function and cochlear input impedance , 2001, Hearing Research.

[43]  J. Fredrickson,et al.  The Otologics MET ossicular stimulator. , 2001, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[44]  J. Kobler,et al.  Simultaneous 3D imaging of sound-induced motions of the tympanic membrane and middle ear ossicles , 2013, Hearing Research.

[45]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Feasibility of Round Window Stimulation by a Novel Electromagnetic Microactuator , 2017, BioMed research international.

[46]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Validation of methods for prediction of clinical output levels of active middle ear implants from measurements in human cadaveric ears , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[47]  A. Krokstad,et al.  Noise-induced hearing losses. Can they be explained by basilar membrane movement? , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[48]  Manohar Bance,et al.  Analysis of Vibrant Soundbridge Placement Against the Round Window Membrane in a Human Cadaveric Temporal Bone Model , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[49]  Yujin Hu,et al.  Finite element analysis of the coupling between ossicular chain and mass loading for evaluation of implantable hearing device , 2011, Hearing Research.

[50]  Matthias Bornitz,et al.  Evaluation of implantable actuators by means of a middle ear simulation model , 2010, Hearing Research.

[51]  J. Dirckx,et al.  Effects of model definitions and parameter values in finite element modeling of human middle ear mechanics , 2017, Hearing Research.

[52]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction and Modeling of Middle Ear Biomechanics by High‐Resolution Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[53]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Fluid volume displacement at the oval and round windows with air and bone conduction stimulation. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  B. Li,et al.  Restoring hearing using total ossicular replacement prostheses – analysis of 3D finite element model , 2012, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[55]  B. Moore.  Cochlear hearing loss : physiological, psychological and technical issues , 2014 .

[56]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Houguang Liu,et al.  Numerical Study and Optimization of a Novel Piezoelectric Transducer for a Round-Window Stimulating Type Middle-Ear Implant , 2019, Micromachines.

[58]  K. Koka,et al.  Techniques to Improve the Efficiency of a Middle Ear Implant: Effect of Different Methods of Coupling to the Ossicular Chain , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[59]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Actuator: Exploring Alternative Stimulation Sites and Their Stimulation Efficiency , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  Jin-Ho Cho,et al.  A tri-coil bellows-type round window transducer with improved frequency characteristics for middle-ear implants , 2016, Hearing Research.

[61]  The Envoy Esteem implantable hearing system. , 2014, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[62]  Sunil Puria,et al.  Inertial Bone Conduction: Symmetric and Anti-Symmetric Components , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[63]  G. Cheng,et al.  The effect of actuator and its coupling conditions on eardrum-stimulated middle ear implants: A numerical analysis , 2016 .

[64]  Martin Kompis,et al.  Computer assisted optimization of an electromagnetic transducer design for implantable hearing aids , 2004, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[65]  K. Koka,et al.  Prospective Electrophysiologic Findings of Round Window Stimulation in a Model of Experimentally Induced Stapes Fixation , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[66]  Geoffrey R Ball,et al.  The vibrant soundbridge: design and development. , 2010, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[67]  Na Ta,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF ACTUATOR COUPLING CONDITIONS ON ROUND WINDOW STIMULATION , 2015 .

[68]  Haobing Wang,et al.  Anatomy of the Round Window and Hook Region of the Cochlea With Implications for Cochlear Implantation and Other Endocochlear Surgical Procedures , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.