Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison

The purpose of this article is to explain why the world's nuclear power countries differ from each other with respect to their spent nuclear fuel (SNF) policies. The emergence and evolution of three principal SNF approaches are analyzed: direct disposal, reprocessing and SNF export. Five broad explanatory factors are identified and discussed in relation to the observed differences in policy outcomes: military ambitions and non-proliferation, technological culture, political culture and civil society, geological conditions, and energy policy. SNF policy outcomes can generally be seen to result from a complex interaction between these broad factors, but it is also possible to discern a number of important patterns. To the extent that the five factors may undergo far-reaching changes in the future, the historical experience of how they have shaped SNF policies also give a hint of possible future directions in SNF policymaking around the world.

[1]  Anselm Tiggemann.  Die "Achillesferse" der Kernenergie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland : zur Kernenergiekontroverse und Geschichte der nuklearen Entsorgung von den Anfängen bis Gorleben 1955 bis 1985 , 2004 .

[2]  Adam N. Stulberg,et al.  The Federal Politics of Importing Spent Nuclear Fuel: Inter‐branch Bargaining and Oversight in the New Russia , 2004 .

[3]  David Cyranoski.  Japanese nuclear plant in quake risk , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Jonas Anshelm.  Bergsäkert eller våghalsigt? : Frågan om kärnavfallets hantering i det offentliga samtalet i Sverige 1950-2002. , 2006 .

[5]  Arne Kaijser,et al.  Resurs eller avfall? Politiken kring hanteringen av använt kärnbränsle i Finland, Tyskland, Ryssland och Japan , 2007 .

[6]  M. Levenson,et al.  The Nuclear Fuel Cycle , 1976 .

[7]  Stefan Lindström,et al.  Hela nationens tacksamhet : svensk forskningspolitik på atomenergiområdet : 1945-1956 , 1991 .

[8]  H. A. Feiveson,et al.  South Korea's shifting and controversial interest in spent fuel reprocessing , 2001 .

[9]  M. V. Ramana,et al.  NUCLEAR POWER IN INDIA: FAILED PAST, DUBIOUS FUTURE , 2011 .

[10]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Spent fuel and plutonium policies in Western Europe: The non-nuclear weapon states , 1991 .

[11]  A Hallsworth,et al.  Sustainable Consumption and Consumer Policy. A report to the Dept. of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. London BERR , 2008 .

[12]  Frank von Hippel,et al.  Plutonium and Reprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel , 2001 .

[13]  Per Högselius.  Die deutsch-deutsche Geschichte des Kernkraftwerkes Greifswald. Atomenergie zwischen Ost und West , 2005 .

[14]  Paul R. Josephson,et al.  Technological utopianism in the twenty‐first century: russia's nuclear future , 2003 .

[15]  Joachim Radkau,et al.  Kraft, Energie und Arbeit : Energie und Gesellschaft , 1981 .

[16]  S. S. Bajaj,et al.  The Indian PHWR , 2006 .

[17]  Tae Joon Lee.  Technological change of nuclear fuel cycle in Korea: the case of dupic , 2004 .

[18]  Roger Carey,et al.  Independence and Deterrence: Britain and Atomic Energy, 1945–1952 , 1975 .