State of the art report on design for X

The present State of the Art report aims at defining and reviewing the current state of the ship design process in the frame of a holistic approach, accounting for various objectives and constraints. The report addresses mainly the design of transportation carriers, though some covered aspects are also relevant to other ship types and floating devices. Design for X is herein defined as the optimization of a ship with respect to specific important performance indicators and properties, like design for safety, design for efficiency, design for arctic operations and design for production. The concept of Design for Safety was introduced and briefly demonstrated on the basis of the design of the largest cruise vessel ever built. The Design for Efficiency of Performance was reviewed with particular emphasis on recent discussions about fuel savings and the reduction of air emissions in maritime transport. Developments in the Design of ships for Arctic Operations were presented, responding to recent increased maritime transport needs in arctic areas. Finally, recent developments in the Design for Production were presented, which is critical to achieving globally competitive shipbuilding businesses.

[1]  Burton Gischner Enhancing interoperability throughout the design and manufacturing process , 2006 .

[2]  Yasuhisa Okumoto,et al.  Simulation-based ship production using three-dimensional CAD , 2006 .

[3]  Philip C Koenig,et al.  SHIPBUILDING PRODUCTIVITY RATES OF CHANGE IN EAST ASIA , 2003 .

[4]  Michael Goldan EUROPEAN MARITIME RESEARCH: OBJECTIVES, ORGANIZATION, CONTENT, AND PARALLELS WITH THE NSRP PROGRAMS , 2001 .

[5]  Philip C Koenig,et al.  LEAN PRODUCTION IN THE JAPANESE SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY , 2002 .

[6]  Poul Andersen,et al.  Evaluation of the service performance of ships , 2005 .

[7]  Joshua I. Bernstein,et al.  Design methods in the aerospace industry : looking for evidence of set-based practices , 1998 .

[8]  Jong Gye Shin,et al.  Simulation-Based Performance Improvement for Shipbuilding Processes , 2006 .

[9]  Victoria Dlugokecki,et al.  Leading the way for mid-tier shipyards to implement design for production methodologies , 2009 .

[10]  Kyu-Yeul Lee,et al.  Generation of production material information for a building block and simulation of block erection for process planning and scheduling in shipbuilding , 2007 .

[11]  A Kapadia,et al.  Lessons learnt from designing and producing adhesively bonded prototyping structures in a shipyard , 2004 .

[12]  J. P. Boillot,et al.  Six Sigma Methodology Used To Improve Ship Welding , 2008 .

[13]  G. Christiansen,et al.  A mesoscopic model for passenger evacuation in a virtual ship-sea environment and performance-based evaluation , 2002 .

[14]  Hong Zhang,et al.  A knowledge warehouse system for enterprise resource planning systems , 2006 .

[15]  Bahadir Inozu New horizons for shipbuilding process improvement , 2006 .

[16]  Lennart Fransson,et al.  Ice performance of the Swedish multi-purpose icebreaker Tor Viking II , 2001 .

[17]  Wu Nie,et al.  A comparison of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean shipyard production technology , 2007 .