Refining the description of peptide backbone conformations improves protein simulations using the GROMOS 53A6 force field

The GROMOS 53A6 parameter sets have been shown to reproduce an extensive range of thermodynamics data in condensed phase (Oostenbrink et al., J Comput Chem 2004, 25, 1656), mainly due to the reoptimized nonbonded interactions. Here, we derive refinements for the descriptions of peptide backbone conformations for thisparameter set. A two‐dimensional adaptive umbrella sampling procedure was employed to determine the free energy surfaces of model alanine and glycine dipeptides in solution to high accuracy, with sampling errors below 0.8 kJ mol−1 for relative free energies between major minima. Comparisons of these surfaces with quantum mechanical ones and conformation distributions in protein crystal structures indicated that refined treatments of backbone torsional angle terms are necessary. The high accuracy of the computed free energy surfaces allowed us to consider two types of corrections, one numerically and exactly reproducing the quantum mechanical results, and the other using small analytical terms to correct major deficiencies for the dipeptide systems. In addition, aiming at improving the directionality of backbone–backbone hydrogen bonds, we optimized and tested an off‐center charge model for the peptide backbone carbonyl oxygen. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations of five proteins and two peptides in solution indicate that refined treatments of backbone dihedral angles lead to substantial improvements of the simulations. Being much simpler, the analytical terms perform as good as or even slightly better than the exact numerical corrections. Although using off‐center charges brought some improvements, the directionality of hydrogen bonds have not been significantly improved. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2009

[1]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[2]  V. Daggett,et al.  Long timescale simulations. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  Alexander D. MacKerell Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[5]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[6]  D. Baker,et al.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  A. Liljas,et al.  Structure of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L7/L12 from Escherichia coli at 1.7 A. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[9]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , 1981 .

[10]  G. Torrie,et al.  Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .

[11]  D. Frenkel,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  R. Hooft,et al.  An adaptive umbrella sampling procedure in conformational analysis using molecular dynamics and its application to glycol , 1992 .

[13]  D. Beveridge,et al.  Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems. , 1989, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[14]  Yong Duan,et al.  Solvation effects on alanine dipeptide: A MP2/cc‐pVTZ//MP2/6‐31G** study of (Φ, Ψ) energy maps and conformers in the gas phase, ether, and water , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  P. Kollman,et al.  Advancing beyond the atom‐centered model in additive and nonadditive molecular mechanics , 1997 .

[16]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[17]  U Heinemann,et al.  Crystal structure of CspA, the major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R Matthew Fesinmeyer,et al.  Minimization and optimization of designed beta-hairpin folds. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Hiroshi Akima,et al.  Algorithm 761: Scattered-data surface fitting that has the accuracy of a cubic polynomial , 1996, TOMS.

[20]  Gordon M. Forker Langeʼs Handbook of Chemistry , 1957 .

[21]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[23]  Andreas Klamt,et al.  Treatment of the outlying charge in continuum solvation models , 1996 .

[24]  Giovanni Scalmani,et al.  Polarizable dielectric model of solvation with inclusion of charge penetration effects , 2001 .

[25]  Jacopo Tomasi,et al.  Fast Evaluation of Geometries and Properties of Excited Molecules in Solution: A Tamm-Dancoff Model with Application to 4-Dimethylaminobenzonitrile , 2000 .

[26]  P. Kollman,et al.  How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .

[27]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[28]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Barry Honig,et al.  Comparative study of generalized Born models: protein dynamics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Markus Christen,et al.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05 , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  Jun Wang,et al.  Determination of conformational free energies of peptides by multidimensional adaptive umbrella sampling. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  W. V. Gunsteren,et al.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.

[33]  S Subbiah,et al.  Structure of the amino-terminal domain of phage 434 repressor at 2.0 A resolution. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Andreas Klamt,et al.  Incorporation of solvent effects into density functional calculations of molecular energies and geometries , 1995 .

[35]  Christian Bartels,et al.  Multidimensional adaptive umbrella sampling: Applications to main chain and side chain peptide conformations , 1997 .

[36]  G L Gilliland,et al.  Two crystal structures of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[37]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[38]  R. Friesner,et al.  Evaluation and Reparametrization of the OPLS-AA Force Field for Proteins via Comparison with Accurate Quantum Chemical Calculations on Peptides† , 2001 .

[39]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[40]  Alan E. Mark,et al.  The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide , 1996 .

[41]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[42]  U Stocker,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: A test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data , 2000, Proteins.

[43]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Solvation Free Energies of Amides and Amines: Disagreement between Free Energy Calculations and Experiment , 1995 .

[44]  M. Mezei Adaptive umbrella sampling: Self-consistent determination of the non-Boltzmann bias , 1987 .

[45]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Accurate ab Initio Quantum Chemical Determination of the Relative Energetics of Peptide Conformations and Assessment of Empirical Force Fields , 1997 .

[46]  J. Hermans,et al.  Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine “dipeptides” (Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution , 2003, Proteins.

[47]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[48]  Modesto Orozco,et al.  A consensus view of protein dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations , 1995 .

[50]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  The design and production of semisynthetic ribonucleases with increased thermostability by incorporation of S‐peptide analogues with enhanced helical stability , 1986, Proteins.

[51]  Shunzhou Wan,et al.  Calculation of the aqueous solvation energy and entropy, as well as free energy, of simple polar solutes. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[52]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations in biology , 1990, Nature.

[53]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[54]  D. Baker,et al.  Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  S. Opella,et al.  Structures of the reduced and mercury-bound forms of MerP, the periplasmic protein from the bacterial mercury detoxification system. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[57]  M Elstner,et al.  Quantum mechanics simulation of protein dynamics on long timescale , 2001, Proteins.

[58]  Alessandra Villa,et al.  How sensitive are nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of proteins to changes in the force field? , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[59]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[60]  J Tirado-Rives,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the unfolding of an alpha-helical analogue of ribonuclease A S-peptide in water. , 1991, Biochemistry.