Evolution of the secondary structures and compensatory mutations of the ribosomal RNAs of Drosophila melanogaster.

This paper examines the effects of DNA sequence evolution on RNA secondary structures and compensatory mutations. Models of the secondary structures of Drosophila melanogaster 18S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and of the complex between 2S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs have been drawn on the basis of comparative and energetic criteria. The overall AU richness of the D. melanogaster rRNAs allows the resolution of some ambiguities in the structures of both large rRNAs. Comparison of the sequence of expansion segment V2 in D. melanogaster 18S rRNA with the same region in three other Drosophila species and the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans) allows us to distinguish between two models for the secondary structure of this region. The secondary structures of the expansion segments of D. melanogaster 28S rRNA conform to a general pattern for all eukaryotes, despite having highly divergent sequences between D. melanogaster and vertebrates. The 70 novel compensatory mutations identified in the 28S rRNA show a strong (70%) bias toward A-U base pairs, suggesting that a process of biased mutation and/or biased fixation of A and T point mutations or AT-rich slippage-generated motifs has occurred during the evolution of D. melanogaster rDNA. This process has not occurred throughout the D. melanogaster genome. The processes by which compensatory pairs of mutations are generated and spread are discussed, and a model is suggested by which a second mutation is more likely to occur in a unit with a first mutation as such a unit begins to spread through the family and concomitantly through the population. Alternatively, mechanisms of proofreading in stem-loop structures at the DNA level, or between RNA and DNA, might be involved. The apparent tolerance of noncompensatory mutations in some stems which are otherwise strongly supported by comparative criteria within D. melanogaster 28S rRNA must be borne in mind when compensatory mutations are used as a criterion in secondary-structure modeling. Noncompensatory mutation may extend to the production of unstable structures where a stem is stabilized by RNA-protein or additional RNA-RNA interactions in the mature ribosome. Of motifs suggested to be involved in rRNA processing, one (CGAAAG) is strongly overrepresented in the 28S rRNA sequence. The data are discussed both in the context of the forces involved with the evolution of multigene families and in the context of molecular coevolution in the rDNA family in particular.

[1]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Molecular coevolution among cryptically simple expansion segments of eukaryotic 26S/28S rRNAs. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  John M. Hancock,et al.  Complete sequences of the rRNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  D. Tautz,et al.  Evolutionary divergence of promoters and spacers in the rDNA family of four Drosophila species. Implications for molecular coevolution in multigene families. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  N. Cross,et al.  A novel arrangement of sequence elements surrounding the rDNA promoter and its spacer duplications in tsetse species. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  G. Roeder,et al.  Recombination-stimulating sequences in yeast ribosomal DNA correspond to sequences regulating transcription by RNA polymerase I , 1987, Cell.

[6]  J. Bachellerie,et al.  Comparisons of large subunit rRNAs reveal some eukaryote-specific elements of secondary structure. , 1987, Biochimie.

[7]  H. Fujiwara,et al.  Molecular mechanism of introduction of the hidden break into the 28S rRNA of insects: implication based on structural studies. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  R. Gutell,et al.  Higher order structure in ribosomal RNA. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[9]  A. Coulson,et al.  The rDNA of C. elegans: sequence and structure. , 1986, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  H. Noller,et al.  Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16 S ribosomal RNA and 30 S ribosomal subunits using primer extension. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  J. Erickson,et al.  Variation among human 28S ribosomal RNA genes. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Strachan,et al.  Transition stages of molecular drive in multiple‐copy DNA families in Drosophila , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[13]  S. Gerbi,et al.  rRNA proceesing: removal of only nineteen bas at the gap between 28Sα and 28Sβ rRNAs in Sciara coprophila , 1985 .

[14]  G Bernardi,et al.  The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. , 1985, Science.

[15]  S. Gerbi Evolution of Ribosomal DNA , 1985 .

[16]  Sugiura Masahiro,et al.  The complete nucleotide sequence of a rice 25S β rRNA gene , 1985 .

[17]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Evolution of DNA Sequences , 1985 .

[18]  M. Sugiura,et al.  The complete nucleotide sequence of a rice 25S.rRNA gene. , 1985, Gene.

[19]  R. Gutell,et al.  Comparative anatomy of 16-S-like ribosomal RNA. , 1985, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[20]  G. Volckaert,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of a crustacean 18S ribosomal RNA gene and secondary structure of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNAs. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  A. Wilson,et al.  Molecular Evolution in Drosophila and the Higher Diptera II. A Time Scale for Fly Evolution , 1984 .

[22]  R. Flavell,et al.  Molecular coevolution: DNA divergence and the maintenance of function , 1984, Cell.

[23]  T. Ohta,et al.  The cohesive population genetics of molecular drive. , 1984, Genetics.

[24]  S. Gerbi,et al.  Xenopus laevis 28S ribosomal RNA: a secondary structure model and its evolutionary and functional implications. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  J. Bachellerie,et al.  Secondary structure of mouse 28S rRNA and general model for the folding of the large rRNA in eukaryotes. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  R. Brimacombe,et al.  Xenopus laevis 18S ribosomal RNA: experimental determination of secondary structural elements, and locations of methyl groups in the secondary structure model. , 1984, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  H. Noller Structure of ribosomal RNA. , 1984, Annual review of biochemistry.

[28]  R. Singhal,et al.  Structure, function and evolution of 5-S ribosomal RNAs. , 1984, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[29]  R. Gutell,et al.  Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[30]  R. Gourse,et al.  Sequence analysis of 28S ribosomal DNA from the amphibian Xenopus laevis. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  R. Brimacombe,et al.  Refined secondary structure models for the 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli. , 1983, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Masatoshi Nei,et al.  Evolution of genes and proteins. , 1983 .

[33]  B. Jacq,et al.  [Sequence of the central break region of the precursor of Drosophila 26S ribosomal RNA]. , 1983, Comptes rendus des seances de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[34]  C. Zwieb,et al.  The structure of ribosomal RNA and its organization relative to ribosomal protein. , 1983, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[35]  G. Dover,et al.  Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution , 1982, Nature.

[36]  B. Jordan,et al.  Sequence of the 3′‐terminal portion of Drosophila melanogaster 18 S rRNA and of the adjoining spacer , 1980, FEBS letters.

[37]  太田 朋子 Evolution and variation of multigene families , 1980 .

[38]  G. Pavlakis,et al.  Sequence and secondary structure of Drosophila melanogaster 5.8S and 2S rRNAs and of the processing site between them. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  B. Clark Correlation of biological activities with structural features of transfer RNA. , 1977, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[40]  H. Ishikawa Evolution of ribosomal RNA. , 1977, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. B, Comparative biochemistry.

[41]  B. Jacq,et al.  Late steps in the maturation of Drosophila 26 S ribosomal RNA: generation of 5-8 S and 2 S RNAs by cleavages occurring in the cytoplasm. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  A. Rich,et al.  Transfer RNA: molecular structure, sequence, and properties. , 1976, Annual review of biochemistry.

[43]  J. R. Fresco,et al.  Structural and energetic consequences of noncomplementary base oppositions in nucleic acid helices. , 1975, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[44]  D. Crothers,et al.  Improved estimation of secondary structure in ribonucleic acids. , 1973, Nature: New biology.

[45]  I. Tinoco,et al.  Estimation of Secondary Structure in Ribonucleic Acids , 1971, Nature.