A cell viability assessment method based on area-normalized impedance spectrum (ANIS).

Impedance measurement of cells using electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) is widely accepted as an effective method to assess cell status. However, the sensitive frequency drifts over time with the changes of culture condition according to the built circuit model and experimental results. The area-normalized impedance spectrum (ANIS) method, which uses normalized area of impedance spectrum in a certain interval to assess cell viability, was proposed in this paper to solve the problem. The certain interval is calculated due to the threshold Zth, which is determined by 2% decline of the maximum impedance. Stabilities of two methods were analyzed by normalizing the area and impedance, showing that the normalized impedance fluctuated like a wave, while the normalized area was smoother. In addition, Cell Count Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was carried out proving that the correlation index of ANIS method increases by 2.4% compared with impedance sensing method, and the maximum error of ANIS method decreases by 4%. Comparison analysis of two methods with random measurement noise was also discussed in this paper, and the results showed that the ANIS method was less affected by measurement noise than impedance sensing method. It demonstrated that the ANIS method is a more stable and accurate method to assess cell viability.

[1]  Mohendra Roy,et al.  Staining-free cell viability measurement technique using lens-free shadow imaging platform , 2016 .

[2]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of doxorubicin toxicity on cardiomyocytes using a dual functional extracellular biochip. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  Joachim Wegener,et al.  Impedance analysis of adherent cells after in situ electroporation: non-invasive monitoring during intracellular manipulations. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[4]  Sun‐mi Lee,et al.  Real-time monitoring of 3D cell culture using a 3D capacitance biosensor. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  Jun Wang,et al.  High spatial resolution impedance measurement of EIS sensors for light addressable cell adhesion monitoring. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  Frank A. Alexander,et al.  Optimization of interdigitated electrode (IDE) arrays for impedance based evaluation of Hs 578T cancer cells , 2010 .

[7]  Jian Xu,et al.  Influence of cell adhesion and spreading on impedance characteristics of cell-based sensors. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[8]  Lei Wang,et al.  Use of cellular electrical impedance sensing to assess in vitro cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs in a human kidney cell nephrotoxicity model. , 2012, The Analyst.

[9]  M. Nagl,et al.  The Integral Method, a new approach to quantify bactericidal activity. , 2015, Journal of microbiological methods.

[10]  J. Wegener,et al.  Electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[11]  Kaiqi Su,et al.  An improved sensitive assay for the detection of PSP toxins with neuroblastoma cell-based impedance biosensor. , 2015, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[12]  Yong Duan,et al.  A review of impedance measurements of whole cells. , 2016, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[13]  Lei Wang,et al.  Real-time, label-free monitoring of the cell cycle with a cellular impedance sensing chip. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[14]  I. Giaever,et al.  Micromotion of mammalian cells measured electrically. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Liju Yang,et al.  Real-time electrical impedance detection of cellular activities of oral cancer cells. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  Gerald Urban,et al.  An impedance biosensor for monitoring cancer cell attachment, spreading and drug-induced apoptosis , 2016 .

[17]  Joachim Wegener,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance assay to monitor changes in cell shape during apoptosis. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.