Ear asymmetry in an auditory Spatial Stroop Task as a Function of Handedness

A reaction-time (RT) experiment was carried out in which five groups consisting of subjects with various degrees of left and right handedness, participated. The words left and right were presented binaurally, one at a time, either to the left or to the right side, implying four presentation modes. The two interfering presentation modes are regarded as Stroop tasks. Two reaction conditions were applied in separate sessions; 1. reacting to the perceived location, and 2. reacting to the content of the word. With specific hypotheses concerning cerebral dominance for verbal functions in right-handed subjects, but considerably less clear anticipations with respect to left-handers, we obtained an interaction between side of presentation, Stroop effect and handedness. The results are discussed in terms of the relation between the conceptualization of space and cerebral dominance.

[1]  S. Klapp,et al.  Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus-response compatibility: implication for theories of memory coding. , 1979, Acta psychologica.

[2]  J. M. Pieters.  Ipsilateral and Contralateral Reactions to Monaural Lateralized Stimuli , 1979, Cortex.

[3]  D. Kimura.  Functional Asymmetry of the Brain in Dichotic Listening , 1967 .

[4]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J R Simon,et al.  Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  F N Dyer,et al.  The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the stlldy of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[8]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing auditory information: interference from an irrelevant cue. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  J R Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the apparent source of an auditory stimulus. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  W. S. Farrell.  Coding left and right. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Hemisphere differences in an auditory Stroop test , 1975 .

[14]  R. Davis,et al.  The role of hemispheric specialization in the analysis of Stroop stimuli. , 1974, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Processing the terms right and left: a note on left-handers. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  J. Callan,et al.  Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  S. R. Palef,et al.  Representing auditory space , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R H Maki,et al.  Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below? , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Response interference in an information processing task: sensory versus perceptual factors. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  K Laxar,et al.  Asymmetries in processing the terms "right" and "left". , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Annett.  Hand Preference and the Laterality of Cerebral Speech , 1975, Cortex.