SIWAM: Using Social Data to Semantically Assess the Difficulties in Mountain Activities

In the last few years, the amount of people moving to the mountains to do several activities such as hiking, climbing or mountaineering, is steadily increasing. Not surprisingly, this has come along with a raise in the amount of accidents, which are mainly due to the inexperience of the people, and the lack of information and proper planning. Although one could expect to find appropriate updated information about this issue on the Internet, most of the information related to mountain activities is stored in personal blogs, or in Web sites that are not exploiting the possibilities that the Semantic Web and the Social Web offer regarding content generation and information processing. In this paper, we present SIWAM, a semantic framework oriented to share and evaluate the difficulties of mountain activities. It provides a thematic social network front-end to enable users to share their descriptions about their own experiences. Using text mining techniques on these descriptions, it extracts relevant facts about these experiences, which are used to evaluate the difficulty of the particular activity. The evaluation is done according to a well-established standard for evaluating the difficulty of mountain activities (MIDE), which is modeled in the system using ontologies.

[1]  Zoran Bosnic,et al.  Ontology-based multi-label classification of economic articles , 2011, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Eduardo Mena,et al.  An Experience Developing a Semantic Annotation System in a Media Group , 2012, NLDB.

[3]  Daniel S. Weld,et al.  Information extraction from Wikipedia: moving down the long tail , 2008, KDD.

[4]  Xavier Carreras,et al.  FreeLing: An Open-Source Suite of Language Analyzers , 2004, LREC.

[5]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Towards the self-annotating web , 2004, WWW '04.

[6]  B. Pröll,et al.  Covering the semantic space of tourism: an approach based on modularized ontologies , 2009, CIAO '09.

[7]  Ying Ding,et al.  TOURISM ONTOLOGY AND SEMANTIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: STATE-OF-THE-ARTS ANALYSIS , 2007 .

[8]  Mark Jenkins Maxed out on Everest , 2013 .

[9]  Johanna Völker,et al.  A Framework for Ontology Learning and Data-driven Change Discovery , 2005 .

[10]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  The Role of Competency Questions in Enterprise Engineering , 1995 .

[11]  Paul Buitelaar,et al.  Ontology-based information extraction and integration from heterogeneous data sources , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Chihab Cherkaoui,et al.  A knowledge Management Approach Based on Ontologies: The Case of tourism , 2011 .

[13]  Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa,et al.  NeOn methodology for building ontology networks: specification, scheduling and reuse , 2011, DISKI.

[14]  Eduardo Mena,et al.  GEO-NASS: A Semantic Tagging Experience from Geographical Data on the Media , 2013, ADBIS.

[15]  Hannes Werthner,et al.  Harmonise: A Step Toward an Interoperable E-Tourism Marketplace , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[16]  Orkunt Sabuncu,et al.  An ontology-based retrieval system using semantic indexing , 2010, ICDE Workshops.

[17]  Piek Vossen,et al.  EuroWordNet: A multilingual database with lexical semantic networks , 1998, Springer Netherlands.

[18]  Andres Chamarro,et al.  The perception of causes of accidents in mountain sports: a study based on the experiences of victims. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Dejing Dou,et al.  Ontology-based information extraction: An introduction and a survey of current approaches , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..