Eliminating ensembles from equilibrium statistical physics: Maxwell’s demon, Szilard’s engine, and thermodynamics via entanglement

A system in equilibrium does not evolve -- time independence is its telltale characteristic. However, in Newtonian physics the microstate of an individual system (a point in its phase space) evolves incessantly in accord with its equations of motion. Ensembles were introduced in XIX century to bridge that chasm between continuous motion of phase space points in Newtonian dynamics and stasis of thermodynamics: While states of individual classical systems inevitably evolve, a phase space distribution of such states -- an ensemble -- can be time-independent. I show that entanglement (e.g., with the environment) can yield a time-independent equilibrium in an individual quantum system. This allows one to eliminate ensembles -- an awkward stratagem introduced to reconcile thermodynamics with Newtonian mechanics -- and use an individual system interacting and therefore entangled with its heat bath to represent equilibrium and to elucidate the role of information and measurements in physics. Thus, in our quantum Universe one can practice statistical physics without ensembles -- hence, in a sense, without statistics. The elimination of ensembles uses ideas that led to the recent derivation of Born's rule from the symmetries of entanglement, and I start with a review of that derivation. I then review and discuss difficulties related to the reliance on ensembles and illustrate the need for ensembles with the classical Szilard's engine. A similar quantum engine -- a single system interacting with the thermal heat bath environment -- is enough to establish thermodynamics. The role of Maxwell's demon (which in this quantum context resembles Wigner's friend) is also discussed.

[1]  Maximilian Schlosshauer,et al.  Decoherence and the Quantum-To-Classical Transition , 2008 .

[2]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Theory of Heat , 1892 .

[3]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Logical reversibility of computation , 1973 .

[4]  C. Tsallis Entropy , 2022, Thermodynamic Weirdness.

[5]  W. Son Consistent theory for causal non-locality beyond the Born’s rule , 2014, 1401.1012.

[6]  Pierre Rouchon,et al.  Observing a quantum Maxwell demon at work , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Quantum probability law from ‘environment-assisted invariance’ in terms of pure-state twin unitaries , 2006, quant-ph/0611220.

[8]  On Zurek’s Derivation of the Born Rule , 2003, quant-ph/0312058.

[9]  P. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .

[10]  Fernando G S L Brandão,et al.  Generic emergence of classical features in quantum Darwinism , 2013, Nature Communications.

[11]  Zurek,et al.  Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[12]  Kirk T. McDonald,et al.  Maxwell ’ s Demon , 2008 .

[13]  A. Steane Context, spacetime loops and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0611047.

[14]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[15]  O. Lychkovskiy Decoherence at the level of eigenstates , 2017, 1712.04384.

[16]  Giulio Chiribella,et al.  Entanglement as an axiomatic foundation for statistical mechanics , 2016, ArXiv.

[17]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[18]  Boris Gnedenko,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1963 .

[19]  Nobuhiko Saitô,et al.  Statistical Physics , 2021, Major American Universities Ph.D. Qualifying Questions and Solutions - Physics.

[20]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Probabilities from entanglement, Born's rule p{sub k}= vertical bar {psi}{sub k} vertical bar{sup 2} from envariance , 2005 .

[21]  A. J. Short,et al.  Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics , 2005 .

[22]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Wave-packet collapse and the core quantum postulates: Discreteness of quantum jumps from unitarity, repeatability, and actionable information , 2012, 1212.3245.

[23]  ON THE ORIGIN OF PROBABILITY IN QUANTUM MECHANICS , 2011, 1110.0549.

[24]  Charles T. Sebens,et al.  Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[26]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[27]  W. Zurek Quantum Darwinism , 2009, 0903.5082.

[28]  C. Hasse Limits on the observable dynamics of mixed states , 2012, 1206.3012.

[29]  W. Zurek Environment-assisted invariance, entanglement, and probabilities in quantum physics. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[30]  J. Paz,et al.  Redundancy of classical and quantum correlations during decoherence , 2009, 0909.0474.

[31]  Luigi E. Picasso,et al.  Lectures in Quantum Mechanics: A Two-Term Course , 2015 .

[32]  R. Laflamme,et al.  An Experimental Test of Envariance , 2014, 1408.7087.

[33]  N. Bohr The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory , 1928, Nature.

[34]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps , 2014, 1412.5206.

[35]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[37]  Hong,et al.  Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[38]  Martin Plesch,et al.  Maxwell's Daemon: Information versus Particle Statistics , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[39]  A. R. Marlow,et al.  Mathematical foundations of quantum theory , 1978 .

[40]  W. H. Zurek,et al.  Quantum chaos: a decoherent definition , 1995 .

[41]  W. Zurek The Environment, Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 1991 .

[42]  W. Zurek,et al.  Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information , 2005, quant-ph/0505031.

[43]  Quantum origin of quantum jumps: Breaking of unitary symmetry induced by information transfer in the transition from quantum to classical , 2007, quant-ph/0703160.

[44]  W. Zurek Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .

[45]  Rolf Landauer,et al.  Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process , 1961, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[46]  David Poulin,et al.  Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[47]  Wojciech Hubert Zurek,et al.  Maxwell’s Demon, Szilard’s Engine and Quantum Measurements , 2003, quant-ph/0301076.

[48]  R. Laflamme,et al.  Experimental test of environment-assisted invariance , 2015 .

[49]  W. Zurek Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[50]  Su Do Yi,et al.  Particle in a box with a time-dependent δ -function potential , 2016, 1611.07129.

[51]  O. Lychkovskiy Dependence of decoherence-assisted classicality on the way a system is partitioned into subsystems , 2012, 1210.4124.

[52]  L. Szilard On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[53]  T. Tufarelli,et al.  Generic Emergence of Objectivity of Observables in Infinite Dimensions. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[54]  W. Zurek Quantum reversibility is relative, or does a quantum measurement reset initial conditions? , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[55]  Michele Amoretti,et al.  Demonstration of Envariance and Parity Learning on the IBM 16 Qubit Processor , 2018, ArXiv.

[56]  P Horodecki,et al.  Objectivity in a noisy photonic environment through quantum state information broadcasting. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[57]  Richard Von Mises,et al.  Probability, statistics and truth , 1939 .

[58]  I-Sheng Yang The Entanglement Timescale , 2017, 1707.05792.

[59]  A. Gleason Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space , 1957 .

[60]  J. Anders,et al.  Quantum thermodynamics , 2015, 1508.06099.

[61]  J. Oppenheim,et al.  Thermodynamical approach to quantifying quantum correlations. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[62]  B. Garraway,et al.  Application of quantum Darwinism to a structured environment , 2017, 1711.03732.

[63]  Roderich Tumulka,et al.  Canonical typicality. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[64]  Paz,et al.  Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[65]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Redundant information from thermal illumination: quantum Darwinism in scattered photons , 2011, 1102.3179.

[66]  Srednicki Chaos and quantum thermalization. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[67]  Charles H. Bennett Notes on the history of reversible computation , 2000, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[68]  Wojciech H Zurek Entanglement symmetry, amplitudes, and probabilities: inverting Born's rule. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[69]  L. Brown Dirac ’ s The Principles of Quantum Mechanics * , 2006 .

[70]  C. Kiefer Emergence of a classical Universe from quantum gravity and cosmology , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[71]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[72]  S. Olivares,et al.  Entanglement-induced invariance in bilinear interactions , 2009 .

[73]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Complementarity of quantum discord and classically accessible information , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[74]  Zurek,et al.  Decoherence, chaos, and the second law. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[75]  No-signalling-based version of Zurek's derivation of quantum probabilities: A note on "Environment-assisted invariance, entanglement, and probabilities in quantum physics" , 2003, quant-ph/0312150.

[76]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Amplification, redundancy, and quantum Chernoff information. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[77]  Quantum probabilities from quantum entanglement: Experimentally unpacking the Born rule , 2016, 1604.01471.

[78]  R. Landauer Information is physical , 1991 .

[79]  Wojciech Hubert Zurek Quantum discord and Maxwell's demons , 2003 .

[80]  Sebastian Deffner,et al.  Demonstration of entanglement assisted invariance on IBM's quantum experience , 2016, Heliyon.

[81]  C Jess Riedel,et al.  Quantum Darwinism in an everyday environment: huge redundancy in scattered photons. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[82]  G. Yocky,et al.  Decoherence , 2018, Principles of Quantum Computation and Information.

[83]  Masahito Ueda,et al.  Supremacy of the quantum many-body Szilard engine with attractive bosons , 2017, 1701.08138.

[84]  W. Zurek Probabilities from entanglement , Born ’ s rule , 2005 .

[85]  Marshall Baker,et al.  Lectures on quantum mechanics , 2014, Quantum Information Processing.

[86]  L. Szilard über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen , 1929 .

[87]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Objective past of a quantum universe: Redundant records of consistent histories , 2013, 1312.0331.

[88]  Marco G. Genoni,et al.  Detecting Gaussian entanglement via extractable work , 2017 .

[89]  Sebastian Deffner,et al.  Foundations of statistical mechanics from symmetries of entanglement , 2015, 1504.02797.

[90]  Takahiro Sagawa,et al.  Quantum Szilard engine. , 2010, Physical review letters.