论文信息 - Center Points in Second-Order Response Surface Designs

Center Points in Second-Order Response Surface Designs

Previous approaches for selecting the number of center points in a second-order response surface design are explained, and an integrated variance criterion is offered. Calculations extending results in the literature are made for various composite and Box-Behnken designs for 2 ≤ k ≤ 8. The results are compared and discussed and indicate that fewer center points than initially recommended are generally appropriate.

Norman R. Draper | N. Draper

[1] James M. Lucas,et al. Optimum Composite Designs , 1974 .

[2] R Mead,et al. A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint. , 1975, Biometrics.

[3] G. Box,et al. A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design , 1959 .

[4] Norman L. Johnson,et al. Statistics and experimental design: in engineering and the physical science , 1965 .

[5] James M. Lucas,et al. Design Efficiencies for Varying Numbers of Centre Points , 1977 .

[6] J. S. Hunter,et al. MULTIFACTOR EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN FOR EXPLORING THE RESPONSE SURFACES , 1957 .

[7] R. H. Farrell,et al. Optimum multivariate designs , 1967 .

[8] J. Kiefer. Optimum Experimental Designs V, with Applications to Systematic and Rotatable Designs , 1961 .

[9] R. C. St. John,et al. D-Optimality for Regression Designs: A Review , 1975 .

[10] James M. Lucas,et al. Which Response Surface Design is Best: A Performance Comparison of Several Types of Quadratic Response Surface Designs in Symmetric Regions , 1976 .

[11] D. Cox,et al. Recent Work on the Design of Experiments: A Bibliography and a Review , 1969 .

[12] J. S. Hunter,et al. Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces , 1957 .

[13] G. Box,et al. THE CHOICE OF A SECOND ORDER ROTATABLE DESIGN , 1963 .

[14] William G. Cochran,et al. Experimental designs, 2nd ed. , 1957 .