Genome-wide characterization of the routes to pluripotency

Somatic cell reprogramming to a pluripotent state continues to challenge many of our assumptions about cellular specification, and despite major efforts, we lack a complete molecular characterization of the reprograming process. To address this gap in knowledge, we generated extensive transcriptomic, epigenomic and proteomic data sets describing the reprogramming routes leading from mouse embryonic fibroblasts to induced pluripotency. Through integrative analysis, we reveal that cells transition through distinct gene expression and epigenetic signatures and bifurcate towards reprogramming transgene-dependent and -independent stable pluripotent states. Early transcriptional events, driven by high levels of reprogramming transcription factor expression, are associated with widespread loss of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) trimethylation, representing a general opening of the chromatin state. Maintenance of high transgene levels leads to re-acquisition of H3K27me3 and a stable pluripotent state that is alternative to the embryonic stem cell (ESC)-like fate. Lowering transgene levels at an intermediate phase, however, guides the process to the acquisition of ESC-like chromatin and DNA methylation signature. Our data provide a comprehensive molecular description of the reprogramming routes and is accessible through the Project Grandiose portal at http://www.stemformatics.org.

[1]  Yong Zhang,et al.  Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[2]  Lee E. Edsall,et al.  Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[3]  J. Wrana,et al.  Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[4]  Wei Wang,et al.  piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[5]  W. Huber,et al.  Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data , 2012, Genome research.

[6]  Jun S. Song,et al.  Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[7]  Eric Nestler,et al.  ngs.plot: Quick mining and visualization of next-generation sequencing data by integrating genomic databases , 2014, BMC Genomics.

[8]  David L. A. Wood,et al.  Proteome adaptation in cell reprogramming proceeds via distinct transcriptional networks , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[10]  J. Rinn,et al.  lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation , 2011, Nature.

[11]  J. Rinn,et al.  Ab initio reconstruction of transcriptomes of pluripotent and lineage committed cells reveals gene structures of thousands of lincRNAs , 2010, Nature biotechnology.

[12]  Felix Krueger,et al.  Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications , 2011, Bioinform..

[13]  David L. A. Wood,et al.  An epigenomic roadmap to induced pluripotency reveals DNA methylation as a reprogramming modulator , 2014, Nature Communications.

[14]  M. Selbach,et al.  Orchestrated Intron Retention Regulates Normal Granulocyte Differentiation , 2013, Cell.

[15]  Jeroen Krijgsveld,et al.  Lys-N and trypsin cover complementary parts of the phosphoproteome in a refined SCX-based approach. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  David L. A. Wood,et al.  Small RNA changes en route to distinct cellular states of induced pluripotency , 2014, Nature Communications.

[17]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. , 2011, Genes & development.

[18]  David Landeira,et al.  ESCs require PRC2 to direct the successful reprogramming of differentiated cells toward pluripotency. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[19]  Jialiang Liang,et al.  A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[20]  A. Bauer,et al.  Histone methylation by PRC2 is inhibited by active chromatin marks. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[21]  A. Nagy.  Secondary cell reprogramming systems: as years go by. , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[22]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis , 2008, Nature.

[23]  Yong Zhang,et al.  CPC: assess the protein-coding potential of transcripts using sequence features and support vector machine , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Rowland Mosbergen,et al.  Stemformatics: visualisation and sharing of stem cell gene expression. , 2013, Stem cell research.

[25]  Gratien G. Prefontaine,et al.  Developmentally Regulated Activation of a SINE B2 Repeat as a Domain Boundary in Organogenesis , 2007, Science.

[26]  David L. A. Wood,et al.  Divergent reprogramming routes lead to alternative stem-cell states , 2014, Nature.

[27]  M. Bucan,et al.  Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy , 2005, Genome Biology.

[28]  J. Rinn,et al.  Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Bing Li,et al.  The Role of Chromatin during Transcription , 2007, Cell.

[30]  Piero Carninci,et al.  Chromatin signatures and retrotransposon profiling in mouse embryos reveal regulation of LINE-1 by RNA , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[32]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  Erdahl T. Teber,et al.  The transcriptional and functional properties of mouse epiblast stem cells resemble the anterior primitive streak. , 2014, Cell stem cell.

[34]  R. Behringer,et al.  Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual , 2002 .

[35]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[36]  J. Whitsett,et al.  Conditional and inducible transgene expression in mice through the combinatorial use of Cre-mediated recombination and tetracycline induction , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[37]  Benjamin A. Garcia,et al.  Asymmetrically Modified Nucleosomes , 2012, Cell.

[38]  S. Linnarsson,et al.  High resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells , 2013, Nature.

[39]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Epigenomic Analysis of Multilineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, Cell.

[40]  J. Rinn,et al.  Ab initio reconstruction of transcriptomes of pluripotent and lineage committed cells reveals gene structures of thousands of lincRNAs , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias , 2011, Genome Biology.

[42]  D. Mager,et al.  Transposable elements: an abundant and natural source of regulatory sequences for host genes. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[43]  P. Farnham,et al.  Using ChIP-seq technology to generate high-resolution profiles of histone modifications. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[44]  M. Robinson,et al.  A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data , 2010, Genome Biology.

[45]  James A. Cuff,et al.  A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell.

[46]  Andrew Emili,et al.  PRISM, a Generic Large Scale Proteomic Investigation Strategy for Mammals*S , 2003, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[47]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  G. Pan,et al.  The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C-dependent manner. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[49]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[50]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  A Molecular Roadmap of Reprogramming Somatic Cells into iPS Cells , 2012, Cell.

[51]  Muneef Ayyash,et al.  The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming , 2012, Nature.

[52]  B. Zhu,et al.  H3K36 Methylation Antagonizes PRC2-mediated H3K27 Methylation* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Michael T. McManus,et al.  Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[54]  S. Tang.  Chromatin Organization by Repetitive Elements (CORE): A Genomic Principle for the Higher-Order Structure of Chromosomes , 2011, Genes.

[55]  Danny Reinberg,et al.  A double take on bivalent promoters. , 2013, Genes & development.

[56]  Michael F. Lin,et al.  Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals , 2009, Nature.

[57]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[58]  J. Wrana,et al.  A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[59]  Sandy L. Klemm,et al.  Single-Cell Expression Analyses during Cellular Reprogramming Reveal an Early Stochastic and a Late Hierarchic Phase , 2012, Cell.

[60]  Robert E. Kingston,et al.  Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[61]  N. Brockdorff,et al.  Polycomb Repressive Complexes Restrain the Expression of Lineage-Specific Regulators in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Cell cycle.