Monovision and the Misperception of Motion

Monovision corrections are a common treatment for presbyopia. Each eye is fit with a lens that sharply focuses light from a different distance, causing the image in one eye to be blurrier than the other. Millions of people in the United States and Europe have monovision corrections, but little is known about how differential blur affects motion perception. We investigated by measuring the Pulfrich effect, a stereo-motion phenomenon first reported nearly 100 years ago. When a moving target is viewed with unequal retinal illuminance or contrast in the two eyes, the target appears to be closer or further in depth than it actually is, depending on its frontoparallel direction. The effect occurs because the image with lower illuminance or contrast is processed more slowly. The mismatch in processing speed causes a neural disparity, which results in the illusory motion in depth. What happens with differential blur? Remarkably, differential blur causes a reverse Pulfrich effect, an apparent paradox. Blur reduces contrast and should therefore cause processing delays. But the reverse Pulfrich effect implies that the blurry image is processed more quickly. The paradox is resolved by recognizing that: i) blur reduces the contrast of high-frequency image components more than low-frequency image components, and ii) high spatial frequencies are processed more slowly than low spatial frequencies, all else equal. Thus, this new illusion—the reverse Pulfrich effect—can be explained by known properties of the early visual system. A quantitative analysis shows that the associated misperceptions are large enough to impact public safety.

[1]  R. Freeman,et al.  A physiological correlate of the pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat , 1989, Vision Research.

[2]  D. Flitcroft,et al.  Binocular interactions in accommodation control: effects of anisometropic stimuli , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  D. G. Albrecht Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: Effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Wheatstone XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[5]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular summation occurs during interocular suppression. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. Webster,et al.  A cyclopean neural mechanism compensating for optical differences between the eyes , 2015, Current Biology.

[7]  S. Anstis,et al.  Visual delay as a function of luminance. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  M. Morgan,et al.  Apparent Motion and the Pulfrich Effect , 1975, Perception.

[9]  P. Kaufman,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia. , 2001, International ophthalmology clinics.

[10]  Johannes Burge,et al.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  C. Pulfrich Die Stereoskopie im Dienste der isochromen und heterochromen Photometrie , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[12]  N. Qian,et al.  A Physiological Model for Motion-Stereo Integration and a Unified Explanation of Pulfrich-like Phenomena , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  G. Yoon,et al.  Modified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performance. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  D. G. Green,et al.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  B. Cumming,et al.  The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[16]  P Erickson,et al.  Visual Function with Presbyopic Contact Lens Correction , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  A. Vassilev,et al.  Perception time and spatial frequency , 1976, Vision Research.

[18]  P. Erickson,et al.  Stereopsis in Presbyopes Wearing Monovision and Simultaneous Vision Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[19]  The El Greco effect: Perceptual distortion from visual cortical reorganization , 2005 .

[20]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Factors influencing the temporal phase of response to bar and grating stimuli for simple cells in the cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Izumi Ohzawa,et al.  Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Aaron B. Zimmerman,et al.  Contact Lens Wearer Demographics and Risk Behaviors for Contact Lens-Related Eye Infections — United States, 2014 , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[23]  Lynn Marran,et al.  Lens induced aniso-accommodation , 1998, Vision Research.

[24]  A. Lit,et al.  The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of target velocity. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Temporal studies with flashed gratings: Inferences about human transient and sustained channels , 1977, Vision Research.

[26]  A. Lit,et al.  The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of distance of observation. , 1951, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Retinal adaptation of visual processing time delays , 1993, Vision Research.

[28]  B. Cumming,et al.  All Pulfrich-like illusions can be explained without joint encoding of motion and disparity. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[29]  H. D. Baker,et al.  New method of measuring visual-perceptual latency differences , 1968 .

[30]  D. Levi,et al.  Suprathreshold spatial frequency detection and binocular interaction in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  Anthea M Burnett,et al.  Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Modelling. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[32]  David A. Atchison,et al.  Accommodation and presbyopia , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[33]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[34]  A. Vassilev,et al.  On the delay in processing high spatial frequency visual information: reaction time and VEP latency study of the effect of local intensity of stimulation , 2002, Vision Research.

[35]  James S. Wolffsohn,et al.  Presbyopia: Effectiveness of correction strategies , 2019, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[36]  A. Lit The magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[37]  J. Movshon,et al.  Adaptive Temporal Integration of Motion in Direction-Selective Neurons in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[39]  D. T. Landrigan Measurements of the Pulfrich effect over days of exposure. , 1984, The Journal of psychology.

[40]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Memory models of visual search - searching in-the-head vs. in-the-world? , 2010 .

[41]  P. Morgan,et al.  International contact lens prescribing , 2002 .

[42]  G. Heron,et al.  The Pulfrich effect in optometric practice , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[43]  W. Geisler,et al.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[44]  M. Weal,et al.  Pulfrich’s phenomenon in unilateral cataract , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[45]  C. Schor,et al.  Effects of interocular blur suppression ability on monovision task performance. , 1989, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[46]  A. Bradley,et al.  Accommodation in Early Presbyopes Fit with Bilateral or Unilateral Near Add. , 2018, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  Charles Wheatstone On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[48]  R. Hess,et al.  Interocular contrast difference drives illusory 3D percept , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[49]  R. Freeman,et al.  Pulfrich phenomena are coded effectively by a joint motion-disparity process. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[50]  D A Atchison,et al.  Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[51]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Ocular Dominance and the Interocular Suppression of Blur in Monovision , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[52]  S. Anstis,et al.  Intensity versus adaptation and the Pulfrich stereophenomenon. , 1972, Vision research.

[53]  R. C. Macridis A review , 1963 .

[54]  H. Radhakrishnan,et al.  Age‐related changes in static accommodation and accommodative miosis , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[55]  C M Schor,et al.  The effect of target proximity on the aniso‐accommodative response , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[56]  A. Stockman,et al.  Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency , 2006, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[57]  P. Dodwell,et al.  Dark adaptation and the Pulfrich effect , 1968 .

[58]  Bruce J W Evans,et al.  Monovision: a review , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[59]  B. H. Fox,et al.  Two aspects of the Pulfrich phenomenon. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[60]  E. Bennett Contact lens correction of presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[61]  J. Nachmias Effect of Exposure Duration on Visual Contrast Sensitivity with Square-Wave Gratings*† , 1967 .

[62]  W. Charman The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[63]  B. Philip,et al.  International Contact Lens Prescribing in 2017 , 2018 .

[64]  David Williams,et al.  Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity , 1993 .

[65]  W. Charman,et al.  Interocular differences in visual latency induced by reduced‐aperture monovision , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[66]  S. McKee,et al.  Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images , 1980 .

[67]  BELA JULESZ,et al.  Short Term Visual Memory and the Pulfrich Phenomenon , 1969, Nature.

[68]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[69]  Magnitude of the Pulfrich stereophenomenon as a function of target thickness. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[70]  V B Nakagawara,et al.  Monovision contact lens use in the aviation environment: a report of a contact lens-related aircraft accident. , 2000, Optometry.

[71]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[72]  F. Campbell,et al.  Correlation of accommodation between the two eyes. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.