New ARMO-based MPPT Technique to Minimize Tracking Time and Fluctuation at Output of PV Systems under Rapidly Changing Shading Conditions

The presence of bypass diodes that mitigate the negative effects of partial shading (PS) conditions produces multiple peak characteristics at the output of a photovoltaic (PV) array. Conventional maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods develop errors under certain circumstances and detect the local maximum power point (LMPP) instead of the global maximum power point (GMPP). Several artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods have been used to modify the performance of conventional controllers. However, these methods have either not completely solved the PS problem or resulted in considerably complicated and unreliable methodologies, as well as require further development to be used in high-speed applications. This study aims to design, develop, and verify a novel rapid, reliable, and cost-effective method called adaptive radial movement optimization (ARMO) to diminish the effect of the PS problem in the MPP detection for PV systems with additional dynamic applications. The main advantages of ARMO are its improved tracking speed and significant reduction in output fluctuations during the tracking period. An extensive experimental verification has been conducted to provide a fair evaluation of the proposed method compared with conventional and recently developed methods under similar conditions while being applied to a unique PV system and DC/DC converter.

[1]  K. L. Lian,et al.  A Maximum Power Point Tracking Method Based on Perturb-and-Observe Combined With Particle Swarm Optimization , 2014, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[2]  Engin Karatepe,et al.  Artificial neural network-polar coordinated fuzzy controller based maximum power point tracking control under partially shaded conditions , 2009 .

[3]  Z. Salam,et al.  A Modified P&O Maximum Power Point Tracking Method With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation and Improved Tracking Efficiency , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[4]  Adel El-Shahat,et al.  A Novel MPPT Algorithm Based on Particle Swarm Optimization for Photovoltaic Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[5]  Bidyadhar Subudhi,et al.  A Grey Wolf-Assisted Perturb & Observe MPPT Algorithm for a PV System , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[6]  Anis Sakly,et al.  Comparison between conventional methods and GA approach for maximum power point tracking of shaded solar PV generators , 2013 .

[7]  Chakkarapani Manickam,et al.  Fireworks Enriched P&O Algorithm for GMPPT and Detection of Partial Shading in PV Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[8]  Chakkarapani Manickam,et al.  A Hybrid Algorithm for Tracking of GMPP Based on P&O and PSO With Reduced Power Oscillation in String Inverters , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian,et al.  Efficient Photovoltaic System Maximum Power Point Tracking Using a New Technique , 2016 .

[10]  Md Enamul Haque,et al.  A Simulated Annealing Global Maximum Power Point Tracking Approach for PV Modules Under Partial Shading Conditions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  Masafumi Miyatake,et al.  Maximum Power Point Tracking of Multiple Photovoltaic Arrays: A PSO Approach , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Martin Ordonez,et al.  High-Performance Solar MPPT Using Switching Ripple Identification Based on a Lock-In Amplifier , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  Mohammad Hassan Moradi,et al.  A Function-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Method for Photovoltaic Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[14]  Rebecca J. Yang,et al.  Building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV): costs, benefits, risks, barriers and improvement strategy , 2016 .

[15]  M. Seyedmahmoudian,et al.  Simulation and Hardware Implementation of New Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Partially Shaded PV System Using Hybrid DEPSO Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[16]  Susovon Samanta,et al.  An Adaptive Voltage-Sensor-Based MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems With SEPIC Converter Including Steady-State and Drift Analysis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Yi-Hwa Liu,et al.  A Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[18]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  A Deterministic Particle Swarm Optimization Maximum Power Point Tracker for Photovoltaic System Under Partial Shading Condition , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  S. K. Kollimalla,et al.  Variable Perturbation Size Adaptive P&O MPPT Algorithm for Sudden Changes in Irradiance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[20]  Bidyadhar Subudhi,et al.  A New MPPT Design Using Grey Wolf Optimization Technique for Photovoltaic System Under Partial Shading Conditions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[21]  Stephen J. Finney,et al.  A Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Systems in Microgrids , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  B N Alajmi,et al.  Fuzzy-Logic-Control Approach of a Modified Hill-Climbing Method for Maximum Power Point in Microgrid Standalone Photovoltaic System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[23]  Rubiyah Yusof,et al.  A new simple, fast and efficient algorithm for global optimization over continuous search-space problems: Radial Movement Optimization , 2014, Appl. Math. Comput..

[24]  Rubiyah Yusof,et al.  Analytical modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[25]  Bijaya K. Panigrahi,et al.  Rapid MPPT for Uniformly and Partial Shaded PV System by Using JayaDE Algorithm in Highly Fluctuating Atmospheric Conditions , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.