The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples

Development and validation of Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire.Two factors: direct aggression (greater than 70% prevelence) and control (higher than 10% prevelence).Cyber dating abuse has relationship with offline dating violence and cyberbullying. Cyber dating abuse is a growing phenomenon that has awakened little empirical interest. This study had two objectives: (1) to analyze the psychometric properties of the Cyber Dating Abuse Questionnaire (CDAQ), which is an instrument developed to comprehensively measure this phenomenon; and (2) to conduct an initial analysis of the prevalence and frequency of this type of abuse. The sample consisted of 788 young people between 18 and 30years of age (77.3% women, mean age=22.72years, SD=4.9). First, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes revealed a structure composed of two factors for the scales of victimization and for perpetration: direct aggression (an aggressive act with a deliberate intention to hurt the partner/ex-partner, such as insults or threats) and monitoring/control (the use of electronic means to control the partner/ex-partner; for example, the use of personal passwords). Second, the analysis of the relationship between cyber dating abuse and other variables, such as offline physical and psychological violence and cyberbullying, provided additional evidence for the construct validity of the instrument. Third, the reliability analysis (Cronbach's alpha) revealed an adequate internal consistency for the scale. Finally, the prevalence of direct aggression was higher than 10%, and the prevalence of control was greater than 70%, which indicate that both types of cyber abuse seem to be common behaviors among young couples. Finally, the contribution of the present study to previous empirical research and future research is discussed.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[2]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45:7 (2004), pp 1308–1316 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics , 2022 .

[4]  J. Stockman.  Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students , 2009 .

[5]  A. Estévez,et al.  ADOLESCENTES VÍCTIMAS DE CYBERBULLYING: PREVALENCIA Y CARACTERÍSTICAS , 2010 .

[6]  Fabiola I. Villa-George,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CBQ) Among Mexican Adolescents , 2014, Violence and Victims.

[7]  J. Archer.  Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: a reply to Frieze (2000), O'Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo (2000) , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Brenda K. Wiederhold.  Are "Facebook Murders" a Growing Trend? , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  J. Finn.  A Survey of Online Harassment at a University Campus , 2004, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[10]  Jennifer Yahner,et al.  The Rate of Cyber Dating Abuse Among Teens and How It Relates to Other Forms of Teen Dating Violence , 2013, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[11]  Gayla Margolin,et al.  Electronic Aggression Among Emerging Adults , 2013, Emerging adulthood.

[12]  Teens, Technology, and Cyberstalking: The Domestic Violence Wave of the Future? , 2011 .

[13]  Spss,et al.  Discovering Statistics (4th Edition ed. , 2013 .

[14]  David Knox,et al.  Using technology to control intimate partners: An exploratory study of college undergraduates , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  M. Swahn,et al.  Nonreciprocal and Reciprocal Dating Violence and Injury Occurrence among Urban Youth , 2010, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  Jennifer Bonds-Raacke,et al.  College Students' Facebook Stalking of Ex-Partners , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Tim Jones,et al.  Online Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Further Concerns About Facebook , 2011, Journal of Family Violence.

[18]  Elizabeth L. Cohen,et al.  Private flirts, public friends: Understanding romantic jealousy responses to an ambiguous social network site message as a function of message access exclusivity , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Perpetration of Teen Dating Violence in a Networked Society , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Facebook Tells Me So: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Partner-Monitoring Behavior on Facebook , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  K. Bauman,et al.  The Safe Dates Project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. , 1996, American journal of preventive medicine.

[22]  Brian H. Spitzberg,et al.  Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Incidence, Perceived Severity, and Coping , 2000, Violence and Victims.

[23]  M. Straus,et al.  Gender symmetry in prevalence, severity, and chronicity of physical aggression against dating partners by university students in Mexico and USA. , 2007, Aggressive behavior.

[24]  Silvia Carboni,et al.  Attitudes on Gender Stereotypes and Gender-based Violence among Youth , 2013 .

[25]  Lisa A. Melander.  College Students' Perceptions of Intimate Partner Cyber Harassment , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Social Networking Sites in Romantic Relationships: Attachment, Uncertainty, and Partner Surveillance on Facebook , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[27]  J. Gómez,et al.  Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española , 2007 .

[28]  Lourdes Villardón-Gallego,et al.  Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors' profile , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  D. Mahatmya,et al.  The role of dominance, cyber aggression perpetration, and gender on emerging adults' perpetration of intimate partner violence , 2013 .

[30]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Relational dialectics and social networking sites: The role of Facebook in romantic relationship escalation, maintenance, conflict, and dissolution , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  G. Margolin,et al.  College Students’ Electronic Victimization in Friendships and Dating Relationships: Anticipated Distress and Associations With Risky Behaviors , 2011, Violence and Victims.

[32]  Abigail A. Fagan,et al.  Repeat Offending and Repeat Victimization: Assessing Similarities and Differences in Psychosocial Risk Factors , 2011 .

[33]  D. Sugarman,et al.  The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) , 1996 .

[34]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[35]  Michele L. Ybarra.  Linkages between Depressive Symptomatology and Internet Harassment among Young Regular Internet Users , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  C. Fraser,et al.  A High-Tech Twist on Abuse: Technology, Intimate Partner Stalking, and Advocacy , 2005 .

[37]  Androniki Kavoura,et al.  Cyberbullying: A Review of the Literature on Harassment Through the Internet and Other Electronic Means , 2010, Family & community health.

[38]  Seung-A. Annie Jin,et al.  Modality Effects in Second Life: The Mediating Role of Social Presence and the Moderating Role of Product Involvement , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[39]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[40]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying and Cyber Aggression , 2012 .