Diagnostic Performance in Low- and High-Contrast Tasks of an Image-Based Denoising Algorithm Applied to Radiation Dose-Reduced Multiphase Abdominal CT Examinations.

Background: Anatomic redundancy between phases can be used to achieve denoising of multiphase CT examinations. A limitation of iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques is that they generally require use of CT projection data. A frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm applies denoising to the multiphase CT images themselves. This method does not require knowledge of acquisition process or integration into the scanner's reconstruction system and can be implemented as a supplement to commercially available IR algorithms. Objective: To compare radiologists' performance for low-contrast and high-contrast diagnostic tasks evaluated on multiphase abdominal CT between routine-dose images and radiation dose-reduced images processed by a frequency-split multiband-filtration denoising algorithm. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 47 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for known or suspected liver metastases (low-contrast task) and 45 patients who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT for pancreatic cancer staging (high-contrast task). Radiation dose-reduced images corresponding to ≥50% dose reduction were created using a validated noise insertion technique and then underwent denoising using the frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm. Images were independently evaluated in multiple sessions by different groups of abdominal radiologists for each task (low-contrast arm: 3 readers; high-contrast arm: 4 readers). Noninferiority of denoised dose-reduced images to routine-dose images was assessed using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC (JAFROC) figure-of-merit (FOM; limit of noninferiority: -0.10) for liver metastases detection, and using Cohen's kappa statistic and reader confidence scores (100-point scale) for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion. Results: JAFROC FOM for denoised dose-reduced images for liver metastases detection was 0.644 (95% CI: 0.510- 0.778) and for routine-dose images was 0.668 (95% CI: 0.543-0.792; estimated difference, -0.024 [95%CI: 0.084- 0.037]). Intra-observer agreement for pancreatic cancer vascular invasion was substantial to near-perfect when comparing the two image sets (ĸ=0.53-1.00); 95% CI's of all differences in confidence scores between image sets contained zero. Conclusions: Multiphase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images with ≥50% radiation dose reduction that undergo denoising by a frequency-split multiband-filtration algorithm yield similar performance to routine-dose images for liver metastases detection and pancreatic cancer vascular staging. Clinical Impact: The image-based denoising algorithm facilitates radiation dose reduction of multiphase examinations for both low- and high-contrast diagnostic tasks without requiring manufacturer-specific hardware or software.

[1]  Rebecca M. Lindell,et al.  Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels. , 2020, Radiology.

[2]  D. Hough,et al.  Prior iterative reconstruction (PIR) to lower radiation dose and preserve radiologist performance for multiphase liver CT: a multi-reader pilot study , 2019, Abdominal Radiology.

[3]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  State of the Art in Abdominal CT: The Limits of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms. , 2019, Radiology.

[4]  Eun Sun Lee,et al.  Preoperative CT Classification of the Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer: Interobserver Agreement. , 2019, Radiology.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT. , 2019, Radiology.

[6]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Cycle‐consistent adversarial denoising network for multiphase coronary CT angiography , 2018, Medical physics.

[7]  Taylor R. Moen,et al.  Reducing radiation dose for multi-phase contrast-enhanced dual energy renal CT: pilot study evaluating prior iterative reconstruction , 2019, Abdominal Radiology.

[8]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Observer Performance with Varying Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Methods for Detection of Hepatic Metastases. , 2018, Radiology.

[9]  J. Han,et al.  Sub-millisievert CT colonography: effect of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction on the detection of colonic polyps , 2018, European Radiology.

[10]  Marc Kachelrieß,et al.  Noise reduction and functional maps image quality improvement in dynamic CT perfusion using a new k‐means clustering guided bilateral filter (KMGB) , 2017, Medical physics.

[11]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Estimation of Observer Performance for Reduced Radiation Dose Levels in CT: Eliminating Reduced Dose Levels That Are Too Low Is the First Step. , 2017, Academic radiology.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm. , 2017, Radiology.

[13]  Tim Leiner,et al.  Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring. , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[14]  J. Leipsic,et al.  State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. , 2015, Radiology.

[15]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction. , 2015, Radiology.

[16]  Marcus Brehm,et al.  Cardiorespiratory motion-compensated micro-CT image reconstruction using an artifact model-based motion estimation. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  Frank Bergner,et al.  Low-dose cardio-respiratory phase-correlated cone-beam micro-CT of small animals. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  D. DeLong,et al.  Two-dimensional multiplanar and three-dimensional volume-rendered vascular CT in pancreatic carcinoma: interobserver agreement and comparison with standard helical techniques. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  S. Riederer,et al.  The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. , 1978, Physics in medicine and biology.