Topological Approach to Measure Network Recoverability

Network recoverability refers to the ability of a network to return to a desired performance level after suffering malicious attacks or random failures. This paper proposes a general topological approach and recoverability indicators to measure the network recoverability in two scenarios: 1) recovery of damaged connections and 2) any disconnected pair of nodes can be connected to each other. Our approach presents the effect of the random attack and recovery processes on the network performance by the robustness envelopes of realizations and the histograms of two recoverability indicators. By applying the effective graph resistance and the network efficiency as robustness metrics, we employ the proposed approach to assess 10 realworld communication networks. Numerical results verify that the network recoverability is coupled to the network topology, the robustness metric and the recovery strategy. We also show that a greedy recovery strategy could provide a near-optimal recovery performance for the investigated robustness metrics.

[1]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Robustness envelopes of networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[2]  R. Kooij,et al.  A Framework for Computing Topological Network Robustness , 2010 .

[3]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Kemeny's constant and the effective graph resistance☆ , 2017 .

[4]  F. Spieksma,et al.  Effective graph resistance , 2011 .

[5]  H. Stanley,et al.  Spontaneous recovery in dynamical networks , 2013, Nature Physics.

[6]  P Van Mieghem,et al.  Pseudoinverse of the Laplacian and best spreader node in a network. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[7]  José-Luis Marzo,et al.  A study of the robustness of optical networks under massive failures , 2019, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[8]  Bjarne E. Helvik,et al.  A survey of resilience differentiation frameworks in communication networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[9]  James P. G. Sterbenz,et al.  A taxonomy of network challenges , 2013, 2013 9th International Conference on the Design of Reliable Communication Networks (DRCN).

[10]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Improving robustness of complex networks via the effective graph resistance , 2014 .

[11]  An Zeng,et al.  Target recovery in complex networks , 2017 .

[12]  Massimo Tornatore,et al.  Progressive network recovery in optical core networks , 2015, 2015 7th International Workshop on Reliable Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM).

[13]  Yuming Jiang,et al.  Measures for Network Structural Dependency Analysis , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[14]  C. Stam,et al.  The correlation of metrics in complex networks with applications in functional brain networks , 2011 .

[15]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  On progressive network recovery after a major disruption , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[16]  Rita Girão-Silva,et al.  FRADIR: A Novel Framework for Disaster Resilience , 2018, 2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM).

[17]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  Network recovery from massive failures under uncertain knowledge of damages , 2017, 2017 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops.

[18]  José-Luis Marzo,et al.  On Selecting the Relevant Metrics of Network Robustness , 2018, 2018 10th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM).

[19]  Ali Tizghadam,et al.  Autonomic traffic engineering for network robustness , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Matthew Roughan,et al.  The Internet Topology Zoo , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  José-Luis Marzo,et al.  Robustness Comparison of 15 Real Telecommunication Networks: Structural and Centrality Measurements , 2016, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[22]  Nita Yodo,et al.  A concise survey of advancements in recovery strategies for resilient complex networks , 2018, J. Complex Networks.

[23]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Data communications networking , 2006 .

[24]  Xing Pan,et al.  Resilience of and recovery strategies for weighted networks , 2018, PloS one.

[25]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.