The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters
暂无分享,去创建一个
Donald M. Truxillo | Dirk D. Steiner | D. Truxillo | S. Gilliland | D. D. Steiner | Stephen W. Gilliland
[1] Michel Hersen,et al. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment , 2004 .
[2] S. Gilliland,et al. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. , 1994 .
[3] F. Lievens,et al. Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The Role of Selection Information, Belief in Tests, and Comparative Anxiety , 2003 .
[4] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Explanations for selection decisions : Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations , 1999 .
[5] D. Eden,et al. Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. , 1993 .
[6] C. Cooper,et al. International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .
[7] H. Wilke,et al. Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. , 1997 .
[8] M. Deutsch. Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .
[9] Julie B. Olson-Buchanan,et al. Examining the impact of administration medium on examine perceptions and attitudes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[10] S. Rynes,et al. Behavioral Science in the Business School Curriculum: Teaching in a Changing Institutional Environment , 1999 .
[11] Donald M. Truxillo,et al. Multiple Dimensions of Procedural Justice: Longitudinal Effects on Selection System Fairness and Test‐Taking Self‐Efficacy , 2001 .
[12] N. Schmitt,et al. Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.
[13] Dirk D. Steiner,et al. Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives , 2001 .
[14] Barry M. Goldman. Toward an Understanding of Employment Discrimination Claiming: An Integration of Organizational Justice and Social Information Processing Theories , 2001 .
[15] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[16] A. Ryan,et al. APPLICANT WITHDRAWAL: THE ROLE OF TEST‐TAKING ATTITUDES AND RACIAL DIFFERENCES , 1997 .
[17] Maureen L. Ambrose,et al. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice , 2002 .
[18] Ryan,et al. The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.
[19] Markus Groth,et al. IMPROVING APPLICANTS' REACTIONS TO REJECTION LETTERS: AN APPLICATION OF FAIRNESS THEORY , 2001 .
[20] E. Lind,et al. When fairness works : Toward a general theory of uncertainty management , 2002 .
[21] S. Gilliland,et al. Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States , 1996 .
[22] Michael A. Campion,et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback , 1998 .
[23] M. A. Campion,et al. APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .
[24] D. Steiner,et al. Les perceptions de la justice organisationnelle en entretien de recrutement : deux expérimentations par simulation , 2004 .
[25] Hal G. Gueutal,et al. A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .
[26] J. Colquitt. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[27] G. Hofstede,et al. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .
[28] S. Gilliland,et al. Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness. , 2001 .
[29] Zinta S. Byrne,et al. Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .
[30] Neal Schmitt,et al. Applicant decisions in the employment interview. , 1976 .
[31] N. Anderson. Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research , 2003 .
[32] Jerald Greenberg,et al. Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .
[33] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.
[34] T. Tyler,et al. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .
[35] N. Schmitt,et al. Can Racial Differences in Cognitive Test Performance Be Reduced by Presenting Problems in a Social Context , 1998 .
[36] David Chan,et al. Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives , 1998 .
[37] Maureen L. Ambrose,et al. A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[38] A. Ryan,et al. Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. , 1998 .
[39] J. M. Digman. PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .
[40] S. Gilliland. The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .
[41] T. Bauer,et al. Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.
[42] John E. Hunter,et al. Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Adverse impact and examinee attitudes. , 1977 .
[43] Maureen L. Ambrose,et al. Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. , 2001 .
[44] James W. Smither,et al. APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .
[45] N. Schmitt,et al. Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.
[46] A. Ryan,et al. Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[47] K. van den Bos,et al. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. , 2002 .
[48] S. Rynes,et al. Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures , 1993 .
[49] Deniz S. Ones,et al. Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes , 2001 .
[50] Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al. Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .
[51] Jennifer M. George,et al. The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .
[52] D. Chan,et al. Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests. , 1997, Journal of Applied Psychology.
[53] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .
[54] A. Ryan,et al. Applicant self-selection: correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[55] Dirk D. Steiner,et al. Common comparison standards : An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings , 1996 .
[56] Richard D. Arvey,et al. MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .
[57] N. Schmitt,et al. Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.
[58] Christopher L. Martin,et al. Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses , 1989 .
[59] Steven R. Ash,et al. A Web of applicant attraction: person-organization fit in the context of Web-based recruitment. , 2002 .
[60] W. V. Eerde,et al. Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis , 1996 .
[61] Robert E. Ployhart,et al. Estimates of cross-validity for stepwise regression and with predictor selection , 1999 .
[62] Jane Webster,et al. Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.
[63] J. M. Cortina,et al. Determining relative importance of predictors with the observational design. , 1998 .
[64] G. Leventhal. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .
[65] Donald M. Truxillo,et al. Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.
[66] David Chan,et al. Justice in Organizations: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2001 .
[67] David E. Smith,et al. THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER , 1994 .
[68] A. Ryan,et al. The Effect of Selection Ratio on Perceptions of the Fairness of a Selection Test Battery , 1997 .
[69] Donald E. Conlon,et al. Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.
[70] Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study. , 2002 .
[71] P. Mastrangelo. Do college studentsstill prefer companies without employment drug testing? , 1997 .
[72] Filip Lievens,et al. Privacy and Attitudes Towards Internet-Based Selection Systems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2003 .
[73] K. M. Bartol,et al. Effects of dependence, dependency threats, and pay secrecy on managerial pay allocations , 1989 .
[74] Benson,et al. A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations: Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.