The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters

The purpose of this paper is to examine the usefulness of the organizational justice approach to applicant reactions. We begin with an overview of the research relating the fairness of selection procedures ("selection fairness") to individual and organizational outcomes. Next we propose boundary conditions defining when fairness should matter, the appropriate outcomes to examine in applicant reactions research, and methodological issues limiting the contribution of much of the current literature. We then consider a range of questions that remain to be addressed and new issues such as high-tech testing. Finally, we propose a series of applied questions and recommendations based on both theory and empirical research.

[1]  Michel Hersen,et al.  Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment , 2004 .

[2]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. , 1994 .

[3]  F. Lievens,et al.  Applicant Perceptions of Selection Procedures: The Role of Selection Information, Belief in Tests, and Comparative Anxiety , 2003 .

[4]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Explanations for selection decisions : Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations , 1999 .

[5]  D. Eden,et al.  Self-efficacy training to speed reemployment: Helping people to help themselves. , 1993 .

[6]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[7]  H. Wilke,et al.  Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. , 1997 .

[8]  M. Deutsch Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[9]  Julie B. Olson-Buchanan,et al.  Examining the impact of administration medium on examine perceptions and attitudes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  S. Rynes,et al.  Behavioral Science in the Business School Curriculum: Teaching in a Changing Institutional Environment , 1999 .

[11]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  Multiple Dimensions of Procedural Justice: Longitudinal Effects on Selection System Fairness and Test‐Taking Self‐Efficacy , 2001 .

[12]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross‐Cultural Perspectives , 2001 .

[14]  Barry M. Goldman Toward an Understanding of Employment Discrimination Claiming: An Integration of Organizational Justice and Social Information Processing Theories , 2001 .

[15]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[16]  A. Ryan,et al.  APPLICANT WITHDRAWAL: THE ROLE OF TEST‐TAKING ATTITUDES AND RACIAL DIFFERENCES , 1997 .

[17]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice , 2002 .

[18]  Ryan,et al.  The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[19]  Markus Groth,et al.  IMPROVING APPLICANTS' REACTIONS TO REJECTION LETTERS: AN APPLICATION OF FAIRNESS THEORY , 2001 .

[20]  E. Lind,et al.  When fairness works : Toward a general theory of uncertainty management , 2002 .

[21]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States , 1996 .

[22]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback , 1998 .

[23]  M. A. Campion,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .

[24]  D. Steiner,et al.  Les perceptions de la justice organisationnelle en entretien de recrutement : deux expérimentations par simulation , 2004 .

[25]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations , 1983 .

[26]  J. Colquitt On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[28]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness. , 2001 .

[29]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. , 2001 .

[30]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Applicant decisions in the employment interview. , 1976 .

[31]  N. Anderson Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research , 2003 .

[32]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Advances in Organizational Justice , 2001 .

[33]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: the effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[35]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Can Racial Differences in Cognitive Test Performance Be Reduced by Presenting Problems in a Social Context , 1998 .

[36]  David Chan,et al.  Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives , 1998 .

[37]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  A. Ryan,et al.  Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note. , 1998 .

[39]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[40]  S. Gilliland The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .

[41]  T. Bauer,et al.  Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Adverse impact and examinee attitudes. , 1977 .

[43]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. , 2001 .

[44]  James W. Smither,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION PROCEDURES , 2006 .

[45]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  A. Ryan,et al.  Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  K. van den Bos,et al.  Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. , 2002 .

[48]  S. Rynes,et al.  Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures , 1993 .

[49]  Deniz S. Ones,et al.  Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes , 2001 .

[50]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[51]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  The Role of Time in Theory and Theory Building , 2000 .

[52]  D. Chan,et al.  Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests. , 1997, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[53]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .

[54]  A. Ryan,et al.  Applicant self-selection: correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Common comparison standards : An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings , 1996 .

[56]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .

[57]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  Christopher L. Martin,et al.  Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses , 1989 .

[59]  Steven R. Ash,et al.  A Web of applicant attraction: person-organization fit in the context of Web-based recruitment. , 2002 .

[60]  W. V. Eerde,et al.  Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis , 1996 .

[61]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Estimates of cross-validity for stepwise regression and with predictor selection , 1999 .

[62]  Jane Webster,et al.  Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  Determining relative importance of predictors with the observational design. , 1998 .

[64]  G. Leventhal What Should Be Done with Equity Theory , 1980 .

[65]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  David Chan,et al.  Justice in Organizations: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 2001 .

[67]  David E. Smith,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER , 1994 .

[68]  A. Ryan,et al.  The Effect of Selection Ratio on Perceptions of the Fairness of a Selection Test Battery , 1997 .

[69]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study. , 2002 .

[71]  P. Mastrangelo Do college studentsstill prefer companies without employment drug testing? , 1997 .

[72]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Privacy and Attitudes Towards Internet-Based Selection Systems: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2003 .

[73]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Effects of dependence, dependency threats, and pay secrecy on managerial pay allocations , 1989 .

[74]  Benson,et al.  A Rejection Threshold in Justice Evaluations: Effects on Judgment and Decision-Making. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.