The External Performance Appraisal of China Energy Regulation: An Empirical Study Using a TOPSIS Method Based on Entropy Weight and Mahalanobis Distance

In China’s industrialization process, the effective regulation of energy and environment can promote the positive externality of energy consumption while reducing negative externality, which is an important means for realizing the sustainable development of an economic society. The study puts forward an improved technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution based on entropy weight and Mahalanobis distance (briefly referred as E-M-TOPSIS). The performance of the approach was verified to be satisfactory. By separately using traditional and improved TOPSIS methods, the study carried out the empirical appraisals on the external performance of China’s energy regulation during 1999~2015. The results show that the correlation between the performance indexes causes the significant difference between the appraisal results of E-M-TOPSIS and traditional TOPSIS. The E-M-TOPSIS takes the correlation between indexes into account and generally softens the closeness degree compared with traditional TOPSIS. Moreover, it makes the relative closeness degree fluctuate within a small-amplitude. The results conform to the practical condition of China’s energy regulation and therefore the E-M-TOPSIS is favorably applicable for the external performance appraisal of energy regulation. Additionally, the external economic performance and social responsibility performance (including environmental and energy safety performances) based on the E-M-TOPSIS exhibit significantly different fluctuation trends. The external economic performance dramatically fluctuates with a larger fluctuation amplitude, while the social responsibility performance exhibits a relatively stable interval fluctuation. This indicates that compared to the social responsibility performance, the fluctuation of external economic performance is more sensitive to energy regulation.

[1]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Wavelet‐Clustering‐Neural Network Model for Freeway Incident Detection , 2003 .

[2]  Peiyue Li,et al.  Assessment of groundwater quality for irrigation purposes and identification of hydrogeochemical evolution mechanisms in Pengyang County, China , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[3]  Chung-Cheng Lu,et al.  Appraising marketing performance for insurance businesses through improved fuzzy modified GRA , 2014 .

[4]  T. Thamae,et al.  Assessing a decade of regulatory performance for the Lesotho electricity industry , 2015 .

[5]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[6]  Ben Mandel.  Performance-Based Regulation to Improve Upstream Energy Efficiency , 2014 .

[7]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD ON DISTANCE MEASURES , 2007 .

[8]  Rajesh Jugulum,et al.  The Mahalanobis-Taguchi strategy : a pattern technology system , 2002 .

[9]  Zheng-Xin Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  M. Rahmanpour,et al.  Integration of sustainable development concepts in open pit mine design , 2015 .

[11]  Jianhua Wu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[12]  J. Cubbin,et al.  The Impact of Regulatory Governance and Privatization on Electricity Industry Generation Capacity in Developing Economies , 2008 .

[13]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima-Junior,et al.  Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management , 2016 .

[14]  P. Heglund,et al.  A method for assigning species into groups based on generalized Mahalanobis distance between habitat model coefficients , 2009, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[15]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  Energy price, regulatory price distortion and economic growth: a case study of China , 2017 .

[16]  Hong Zhang,et al.  The evaluation of tourism destination competitiveness by TOPSIS & information entropy – A case in the Yangtze River Delta of China , 2011 .

[17]  Toshihiro Matsumura,et al.  Long-Run Welfare Effect of Energy Conservation Regulation , 2016 .

[18]  Bin Su,et al.  Does energy-price regulation benefit China's economy and environment? Evidence from energy-price distortions , 2017 .

[19]  Kedong Yin,et al.  The Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Interval Grey Trapezoid Fuzzy Linguistic Variables , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Zahra Akbari,et al.  Prioritizing the performance of civil development projects in governmental administration agencies, using gray relational analysis (GRA) and TOPSIS approach , 2016 .

[21]  Numan M. Durakbasa,et al.  Evaluation of corporate energy management practices of energy intensive industries in Turkey , 2012 .

[22]  Ching-Hui Chang,et al.  Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria construction management decisions considering relations between criteria , 2010 .

[25]  Fabio Rinaldi,et al.  Thermal–economic–environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of an ice thermal energy storage system for gas turbine cycle inlet air cooling , 2014 .

[26]  Ye Duan,et al.  Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Carbon Economy Development Level Based on AHP-Entropy Method: A Case Study of Dalian , 2016 .

[27]  Wei Cai,et al.  An energy management approach for the mechanical manufacturing industry through developing a multi-objective energy benchmark , 2017 .

[28]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[29]  C. Parkan,et al.  On the equivalence of operational performance measurement and multiple attribute decision making , 1997 .

[30]  Tej Singh,et al.  Hybrid entropy – TOPSIS approach for energy performance prioritization in a rectangular channel employing impinging air jets , 2017 .

[31]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Operation Performance Evaluation of Power Grid Enterprise Using a Hybrid BWM-TOPSIS Method , 2017 .

[32]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[33]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Impacts of Energy Management Practices on Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emissions Reduction: A Survey of Malaysian Manufacturing Firms , 2017 .

[34]  Feiping Nie,et al.  Learning a Mahalanobis distance metric for data clustering and classification , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[35]  A. Bradshaw.  Regulatory change and innovation in Latin America: The case of renewable energy in Brazil , 2017 .

[36]  Endong Wang,et al.  Multi-criteria building energy performance benchmarking through variable clustering based compromise TOPSIS with objective entropy weighting , 2017 .

[37]  Tariff Regulation with Energy Efficiency Goals , 2015 .

[38]  Dongkun Luo,et al.  Driving force of rising renewable energy in China: Environment, regulation and employment , 2017 .