Differentiated Versus Integrated Transactive Memory Effectiveness: It Depends on the Task

This study examined the relations between task type, transactive memory, and group performance. Twenty-three-person groups collaborated on two group tasks: a recall task and an intellective task. The type of transactive memory system imposed on the group (differentiated or integrated) was manipulated. Although there were no statistically significant performance differences between the two types of transactive memory systems on the recall task, the results showed that groups with an integrated transactive memory system completed an intellective task faster and had greater accuracy than those with a differentiated transactive memory system. Groups with an integrated transactive memory reported more helping, error correction, and collaboration, whereas groups with a differentiated transactive memory reported more clarity in the division of responsibility. A content analysis of the videotaped interactions showed that groups with an integrated transactive memory demonstrated behaviors emphasizing the use of shared information, whereas groups with a differentiated transactive memory demonstrated behaviors emphasizing the use of unique information.

[1]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[2]  Yohsuke Ohtsubo,et al.  Should information be redundantly distributed among group members? Effective use of group memory in collaborative problem solving , 2005 .

[3]  Christine L. Jackson,et al.  Peer responses to a team's weakest link: a test and extension of LePine and Van Dyne's model. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Cognitive and Consensus Processes in Group Recognition Memory Performance , 1990 .

[5]  I. Steiner Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[6]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making : When and why does it work? , 2009 .

[7]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[8]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  A Theory of Collective Induction , 1995 .

[9]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[10]  A. Hollingshead Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[11]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory and Performance in Work Groups: Specificity, Communication, Ability Differences, and Work Allocation , 2008 .

[12]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[13]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[14]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[15]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[16]  M. E. Shaw A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[17]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[18]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Jens Förster,et al.  Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? , 2003 .

[20]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[21]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[22]  A. Hollingshead Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Felix C. Brodbeck,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. , 2007 .

[25]  Norbert K. Semmer,et al.  Explicit Reasoning, Confirmation Bias, and Illusory Transactive Memory , 2009 .

[26]  M. Fishbein Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Transactive Memory: When Is It More Beneficial to Know What Others Know? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Potential Benefits of Communication in Transactive Memory Systems , 2003 .

[29]  Mark Schafer,et al.  Individual and Group Decision Making , 2011 .

[30]  C. Gibson Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures , 1999 .

[31]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Who's Really Sharing? Effects of Social and Expert Status on Knowledge Exchange Within Groups , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[32]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[33]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[34]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Communication and Transactive Memory Systems , 2003 .

[35]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆ , 1992 .

[36]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Assumptions about Expertise in Transactive Memory , 2003 .

[37]  L. Thompson,et al.  Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[38]  A. Hollingshead Perceptions of Expertise and Transactive Memory in Work Relationships , 2000 .

[39]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[40]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[41]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 1987 .

[42]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Cooperation, Competition, and Team Performance: Toward a Contingency Approach , 2003 .

[44]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[45]  E. Salas,et al.  Reflections on shared cognition , 2001 .

[46]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  W. Ickes Compatible and Incompatible Relationships , 2012 .

[48]  A. Hollingshead Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[49]  B. Mullen,et al.  Theories of group behavior , 1987 .

[50]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters , 2007, Organ. Sci..