Concept mapping, PowerPoint, and a pedagogy of access

This article explores the synergy that can be created when concept-mapping techniques are used in collaboration with theconstruction of PowerPoint presentations to increase the richness of the learning experience. Some weaknesses of the typical PowerPoint format are highlighted with a description of how they can be overcome through a more considered approach to both the structure of the presentation and the design of supporting handouts that incorporate ideas taken from the literature on concept mapping. In combination, these complementary tools (concept maps and PowerPoint) might contribute to anepistemologically balanced teaching approach. Reflection upon the revealed diversity of students' views may contribute tolecturers' conceptions of teaching. The possibility of using this to generate an inclusive pedagogy of access within higher education is introduced.

[1]  Attila Szabó,et al.  Using IT in the undergraduate classroom: should we replace the blackboard with PowerPoint? , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Mary E. Webb.  Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy , 2005 .

[3]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  T. Guskey.  Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .

[5]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[6]  A. Northedge.  Enabling Participation in Academic Discourse , 2003 .

[7]  A. Chemero.  An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[8]  Lynn Quinn,et al.  Teaching Referencing as an Introduction to Epistemological Empowerment , 2000 .

[9]  Ian M. Kinchin.  Effective teacher ↔ student dialogue: a model from biological education , 2003 .

[10]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The cognitive style of PowerPoint , 2003 .

[11]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Affordances for Learning in a Non-linear Narrative Medium , 2000 .

[12]  R. Kozma.  The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[13]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[14]  Andrew Northedge,et al.  Rethinking Teaching in the Context of Diversity , 2003 .

[15]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Concept mapping in biology , 2000 .

[16]  P. Ramsden.  Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[17]  Gwyneth Hughes,et al.  Use of concept mapping to integrate the different perspectives of designers and other stakeholders in the development of e-learning materials , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  Cliff Atkinson.  Beyond Bullet Points: Using Microsoft PowerPoint to Create Presentations That Inform, Motivate, and Inspire (Bpg-Other) , 2005 .

[19]  D. Hay.  Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non‐learning outcomes , 2007 .

[20]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Exploiting variations in concept map morphology as a lesson-planning tool for trainee teachers in higher education , 2005 .

[21]  G. Nicholls,et al.  Developing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 2001 .

[22]  Bruce C. Howard,et al.  The Experience of Constructivism , 2000 .

[23]  I. Kinchin,et al.  How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development , 2000 .