Influence of surface treatment on osseointegration of dental implants: histological, histomorphometric and radiological analysis in vivo

[1]  Marcus Abboud,et al.  Erratum to: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different titanium implant surface modifications: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[2]  J. E. Maté Sánchez de Val,et al.  Biomechanical and bone histomorphological evaluation of two surfaces on tapered and cylindrical root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. , 2013, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[3]  C. Gretzer,et al.  Enhanced implant integration with hierarchically structured implants: a pilot study in rabbits. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[4]  A. C. Guastaldi,et al.  Laser ablation in titanium implants followed by biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating: Histomorphometric study in rabbits , 2012, Microscopy research and technique.

[5]  Y. Kawai,et al.  Assessment of the Quality of Newly Formed Bone around Titanium Alloy Implants by Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 2012, International journal of biomaterials.

[6]  L. Sennerby,et al.  An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces. , 2012, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  T. Berglundh,et al.  Preclinical in vivo research in implant dentistry. Consensus of the eighth European workshop on periodontology. , 2012, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  G. Gómez-Moreno,et al.  Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC. A dog study , 2012, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[9]  P. Schupbach,et al.  Effects of a calcium phosphate coating on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in a rabbit model. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  P. Schüpbach,et al.  Evaluation of a novel calcium phosphate-coated titanium porous oxide implant surface: a study in rabbits. , 2011, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Influence of titanium implant surface characteristics on bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects: an experimental study in dogs. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  Paulo G Coelho,et al.  Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  C. Elias,et al.  Improving osseointegration of dental implants , 2010, Expert review of medical devices.

[14]  J. Calvo-Guirado,et al.  Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  R. Strocchi,et al.  Is insertion torque correlated to bone-implant contact percentage in the early healing period? A histological and histomorphometrical evaluation of 17 human-retrieved dental implants. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[17]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  J. Wozney,et al.  Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: histologic observations. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  W Wagner,et al.  Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  E. Teixeira,et al.  Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  E. Hunziker,et al.  The influence of BMP-2 and its mode of delivery on the osteoconductivity of implant surfaces during the early phase of osseointegration. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[22]  M. Dard,et al.  Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[24]  J. Jansen,et al.  Implant Surface Roughness and Bone Healing: a Systematic Review , 2006, Journal of dental research.

[25]  D. Puleo,et al.  Implant surfaces. , 2006, Dental clinics of North America.

[26]  T. Testori,et al.  Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  Niklaus P Lang,et al.  De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[28]  Ann Wennerberg,et al.  Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  L. Dermaut,et al.  A histomorphometric analysis of heavily loaded and non-loaded implants. , 2002, The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants.

[30]  A. Carr,et al.  Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  A Scarano,et al.  Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.