Accessible Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities: The Role of Cognitive, Grammatical, Lexical, and Textual/Visual Features. CRESST Report 785.

[1]  D. Koretz,et al.  Assessing Students With Disabilities: Issues and Evidence , 2004 .

[2]  Lorna Idol-Maestas,et al.  Getting Ready to Read: Guided Probing for Poor Comprehenders , 1985 .

[3]  Examining Differential Item Functioning in Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities. CRESST Report 744. , 2008 .

[4]  Norman L. Webb,et al.  Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States. Research Monograph No. 18. , 1999 .

[5]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Advanced Story Map Instruction , 1999 .

[6]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Ann M. Johns.  Genre, Text Type, and the English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Classroom , 2001 .

[8]  Michael E. Anderson,et al.  Considerations for the Development and Review of Universally Designed Assessments. , 2005 .

[9]  Karin K. Hess,et al.  A Discussion of "Increasing Text Complexity" , 2005 .

[10]  Jenny C. Kao,et al.  Examining Differential Distractor Functioning in Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities. CRESST Report 743. , 2008 .

[11]  Jay R. Campbell,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Reading, 2002. , 2003 .

[12]  Morton Botel,et al.  A Formula for Measuring Syntactic Complexity; A Directional Effort. , 1972 .

[13]  J. Chall,et al.  A FORMULA FOR PREDICTING READABILITY , 1948 .

[14]  James Gaston Bloodsworth.  Legibility of Print. , 1993 .

[15]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Reading Research for Students with LD , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  John C Gore,et al.  Neural systems for compensation and persistence: young adult outcome of childhood reading disability , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  M. Wolf,et al.  Providing Validity Evidence to Improve the Assessment of English Language Learners. CRESST Report 738. , 2008 .

[18]  William Stout,et al.  A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF , 1993 .

[19]  Michael Noonan,et al.  Complex sentences in grammar and discourse : essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson , 2002 .

[20]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Universal Design Applied to Large Scale Assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report) , 2002 .

[21]  Jeanne S. Chall,et al.  Qualitative Assessment of Text Difficulty. A Practical Guide for Teachers and Writers. Working Paper Series. , 1996 .

[22]  George Kamberelis,et al.  Genre Development and Learning: Children Writing Stories, Science Reports, and Poems , 1999, Research in the Teaching of English.

[23]  L. Siegel,et al.  Reading Disability as a Language Disorder , 1984 .

[24]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  B. Wong.  Activating the Inactive Learner: Use of Questions/Prompts to Enhance Comprehension and Retention of Implied Information in Learning Disabled Children , 1980 .

[26]  Neil J. Dorans,et al.  Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. , 1986 .

[27]  Gail Portnuff Venable.  Confronting Complex Text: Readability Lessons from Students with Language Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[28]  Stephen B. Dunbar,et al.  Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria , 1991 .

[29]  S. Jay Kuder,et al.  Teaching Students with Language and Communication Disabilities , 1996 .

[30]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Psychology of Reading , 2012 .

[31]  M. Thurlow,et al.  Read-Aloud Accommodation: Effects on Multiple-Choice Reading and Math Items. Technical Report. , 2001 .

[32]  Kate Cain,et al.  Story knowledge and comprehension skill , 1996 .

[33]  Tracey E. Hall,et al.  Universal Design for Learning : Implications for Large-Scale Assessment , 2004 .

[34]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children , 1999 .

[35]  Joanna P. Williams.  Comprehension of students with and without learning disabilities: Identification of narrative themes and idiosyncratic text representations. , 1993 .

[36]  David B. Malouf,et al.  Creating Better Tests for Everyone Through Universally Designed Assessments , 2004 .

[37]  Barbara Elizabeth Roethlein,et al.  The Relative Legibility of Different Faces of Printing Types , 1912 .

[38]  Diane Shorrocks-Taylor,et al.  Making it clear: a review of language issues in testing with special reference to the National Curriculum mathematics tests at key stage 2 , 1999 .

[39]  A Jackson Stenner,et al.  How accurate are lexile text measures? , 2006, Journal of applied measurement.

[40]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  The Alignment of State Standards and Assessments in Elementary Reading. CIERA Report. , 2002 .

[41]  Alfredo J. Artiles.  Special Education's Changing Identity: Paradoxes and Dilemmas in Views of Culture and Space. , 2003 .

[42]  Jamal Abedi,et al.  Impact of Student Language Background on Content-Based Performance: Analyses of Extant Data. CSE Report. , 2003 .

[43]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[44]  A. Bailey,et al.  Standards-to-Standards Linkage Under Title III: Exploring Common Language Demands in ELD and Science Standards , 2005 .

[45]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  IRT-Based Internal Measures of Differential Functioning of Items and Tests , 1995 .

[46]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Preventing reading difficulties in young children , 1998 .

[47]  Linda S. Siegel,et al.  Phonological Processing Deficits as the Basis of a Reading Disability , 1993 .

[48]  Robin Stevens,et al.  Academic English in Fifth-Grade Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies Textbooks. CSE Report 642. , 2004 .

[49]  T. C. Oshima,et al.  Identifying Possible Sources of Differential Functioning Using Differential Bundle Functioning With Polytomously Scored Data , 2007 .

[50]  Carol Lord.  Are subordinate clauses more difficult , 2002 .

[51]  Neil J. Dorans,et al.  ASSESSING UNEXPECTED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM PERFORMANCE OF FEMALE CANDIDATES ON SAT AND TSWE FORMS ADMINISTERED IN DECEMBER 1977: AN APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDIZATION APPROACH1 , 1983 .

[52]  J. Chall,et al.  Readability revisited : the new Dale-Chall readability formula , 1995 .

[53]  E P Abrahamsen,et al.  Reading Comprehension in Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[54]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Annual Performance Reports: 2003-2004. State Assessment Data. , 2005 .

[55]  Comparison of Loglinear and Logistic Regression Models for Detecting Changes in Proportions , 1988 .

[56]  B. Thompson,et al.  The Effects of Prior Knowledge and Schema Activation Strategies on the Inferential Reading Comprehension of Children with and without Learning Disabilities , 1996 .

[57]  C. Johnstone.  Improving Validity of Large-Scale Tests: Universal Design and Student Performance (NCEO Technical Report) , 2003 .

[58]  C. L. Hansen.  Story Retelling Used with Average and Learning Disabled Readers as a Measure of Reading Comprehension , 1978 .

[59]  T. Haladyna,et al.  Construct-Irrelevant Variance in High-Stakes Testing. , 2005 .

[60]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[61]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses , 2009, Cognition.

[62]  W. Finlay,et al.  Assessing the reading comprehension of adults with learning disabilities. , 2006, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[63]  M. Thurlow,et al.  Differentials of a State Reading Assessment: Item Functioning, Distractor Functioning, and Omission Frequency for Disability Categories , 2009 .

[64]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .

[65]  Sandra J. Thompson,et al.  Universal design and multimethod approaches to item review , 2008 .

[66]  Carol Sue Englert,et al.  Sensitivity to Text Structure in Reading and Writing: A Comparison Between Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students , 1987 .

[67]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[68]  D. Filippatou,et al.  Pictures, Titles, Reading Accuracy and Reading Comprehension: a research review (1973‐95) , 1996 .

[69]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Educational Results for Students with Disabilities: What Do the Data Tell Us? Technical Report 23. , 1998 .

[70]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[71]  M. Snowling,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Reading Development in Dyslexic Children. , 1996 .

[72]  S. Zuniga,et al.  Alignment and College Admissions: The Match of Expectations, Assessments, and Educator Perspectives. CSE Technical Report. , 2003 .

[73]  P. E. Webster.  Linguistic factors in reading disability: a model for assessing children who are without overt language impairment , 1994 .

[74]  R. Parker,et al.  The Effects of Syntactic Complexity upon Arithmetic Performance , 1978 .

[75]  J. Teresi,et al.  Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[76]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Testing Students with Disabilities: Practical Strategies for Complying with District and State Requirements , 1997 .

[77]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  语言测试实践 = Language testing in practice , 1998 .

[78]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[79]  Norman L. Webb,et al.  An Analysis of the Alignment Between Language Arts Standards and Assessments for Four States , 2002 .

[80]  J. Oakhill,et al.  Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. , 2004 .

[81]  Dorothy T. Thayer,et al.  Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. , 1986 .

[82]  Douglas R. Glasnapp,et al.  The Impact of Language Characteristics in Mathematics Test Items on the Performance of English Language Learners and Students With Disabilities , 2006 .

[83]  Marilyn D. Wang.  The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility , 1970 .

[84]  Examining Differential Item Functioning in Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities: (642932011-001) , 2008 .

[85]  Wayne Rimmer,et al.  Measuring grammatical complexity: the Gordian knot , 2006 .

[86]  N. Webb.  Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education. Research Monograph No. 6. , 1997 .