Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Francois Tardieu | Onno Muller | Scott C. Chapman | Willem Kruijer | Addie Thompson | Hiroyoshi Iwata | Daniela Bustos-Korts | Marcos Malosetti | Martin P. Boer | Roberto Quiroz | Emilie J. Millet | Konstantinos N. Blazakis | Christian W. Kuppe | W. Kruijer | F. V. van Eeuwijk | S. Chapman | O. Muller | R. Quiroz | F. Tardieu | M. Malosetti | M. Boer | H. Iwata | Daniela Bustos-Korts | Kang Yu | Christian Kuppe | Fred A. van Eeuwijk | Kang Yu | Addie M. Thompson
[1] Alain Charcosset,et al. Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.
[2] Bill Shipley,et al. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User''s Guide to Path Analysis , 2016 .
[3] Lorena González Pérez,et al. Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.
[4] R. Woltereck,et al. Weitere experimentelle untersuchungen über Artänderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden , 1913, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.
[5] Trevor Hastie,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .
[6] Alain Charcosset,et al. Genome-Wide Analysis of Yield in Europe: Allelic Effects Vary with Drought and Heat Scenarios1[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Physiology.
[7] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Multi-Spectral Imaging from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Enables the Assessment of Seasonal Leaf Area Dynamics of Sorghum Breeding Lines , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..
[8] Fabio Fiorani,et al. Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field. , 2016, The New phytologist.
[9] C. Messina,et al. A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Floral Transition of the Shoot Apex in Maize and Its Dynamic Modeling , 2012, PloS one.
[10] G. Casella,et al. Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. , 2002, Genetics.
[11] G. Hammer,et al. Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments , 2002 .
[12] Bridging the genotype–phenotype gap in 3D , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.
[13] Paul H. C. Eilers,et al. Correcting for spatial heterogeneity in plant breeding experiments with P-splines , 2018 .
[14] Christian Fournier,et al. Distinct controls of leaf widening and elongation by light and evaporative demand in maize. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.
[15] W. Kruijer,et al. Phenomics for photosynthesis, growth and reflectance in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals circadian and long-term fluctuations in heritability , 2016, Plant Methods.
[16] Stephen M. Welch,et al. A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in , 2003 .
[17] Takeshi Hayashi,et al. Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[18] F. Baret,et al. What is cost-efficient phenotyping? Optimizing costs for different scenarios. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.
[19] Fred A. van Eeuwijk,et al. Predicting responses in multiple environments : Issues in relation to genotype × Environment interactions , 2016 .
[20] Lianhai Wu,et al. Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function , 2013, Plant and Soil.
[21] Paul H. C. Eilers,et al. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties , 1996 .
[22] F. Tardieu,et al. Predictable 'meta-mechanisms' emerge from feedbacks between transpiration and plant growth and cannot be simply deduced from short-term mechanisms. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.
[23] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.
[24] Dynamics of senescence-related QTLs in potato , 2012, Euphytica.
[25] C. Juday. Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziel über das Wesen quantitativer Artuntershiede bei Daphniden , 1910 .
[26] David Da Silva,et al. Using numerical plant models and phenotypic correlation space to design achievable ideotypes. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.
[27] K. Mather,et al. Genotype X environment interactions. II. Some genetical considerations. , 1975, Heredity.
[28] Walid Sadok,et al. Linking physiological and genetic analyses of the control of leaf growth under changing environmental conditions , 2005 .
[29] F. Tardieu,et al. A Common Genetic Determinism for Sensitivities to Soil Water Deficit and Evaporative Demand: Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci and Introgression Lines of Maize1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.
[30] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. Detection and use of QTL for complex traits in multiple environments. , 2010, Current opinion in plant biology.
[31] N. Meinshausen,et al. Methods for causal inference from gene perturbation experiments and validation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] G. Hammer,et al. Characterizing drought stress and trait influence on maize yield under current and future conditions , 2014, Global change biology.
[33] Jean-Luc Jannink,et al. Multiple-Trait Genomic Selection Methods Increase Genetic Value Prediction Accuracy , 2012, Genetics.
[34] S. Ceccarelli,et al. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes , 1991, Euphytica.
[35] C. Klukas,et al. Dissecting spatiotemporal biomass accumulation in barley under different water regimes using high-throughput image analysis. , 2015, Plant, cell & environment.
[36] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms , 2017 .
[37] Graham D. Farquhar,et al. Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[38] Gustavo A. Slafer,et al. Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment , 2014 .
[39] Roland Chapuis,et al. Resiliences to water deficit in a phenotyping platform and in the field: How related are they in maize? , 2012 .
[40] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. Improvement of Predictive Ability by Uniform Coverage of the Target Genetic Space , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.
[41] I. Misztal,et al. Properties of random regression models using linear splines. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.
[42] Jean-Marcel Ribaut,et al. The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis , 2013, Front. Physiol..
[43] Yusheng Zhao,et al. Multiple-trait- and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes , 2015, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[44] José Crossa,et al. A multi-trait multi-environment QTL mixed model with an application to drought and nitrogen stress trials in maize (Zea mays L.) , 2008, Euphytica.
[45] Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al. A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean , 2017, Plant Methods.
[46] J. Araus,et al. Kernel δ18O reflects changes in apical dominance and plant transpiration in tropical maize , 2017 .
[47] Brian R. Cullis,et al. Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation variety trials , 1998 .
[48] José Crossa,et al. Multitrait, Random Regression, or Simple Repeatability Model in High‐Throughput Phenotyping Data Improve Genomic Prediction for Wheat Grain Yield , 2017, The plant genome.
[49] R. Quiroz,et al. Linking process-based potato models with light reflectance data: Does model complexity enhance yield prediction accuracy? , 2017 .
[50] Carina Moeller,et al. A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[51] James H. Brown,et al. A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.
[52] W. Kruijer,et al. Genotype-phenotype modeling considering intermediate level of biological variation: a case study involving sensory traits, metabolites and QTLs in ripe tomatoes. , 2015, Molecular bioSystems.
[53] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement , 1996 .
[54] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. Root phenotyping: from component trait in the lab to breeding. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.
[55] F. A. van Eeuwijk,et al. Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[56] D. Gianola,et al. Bayesian Networks Illustrate Genomic and Residual Trait Connections in Maize (Zea mays L.) , 2017, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.
[57] Samuel M. Scheiner,et al. Phenotypic plasticity : functional and conceptual approaches , 2004 .
[58] Huwaida S. Rabie,et al. Combining field performance with controlled environment plant imaging to identify the genetic control of growth and transpiration underlying yield response to water-deficit stress in wheat , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.
[59] José Crossa,et al. A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[60] R. Quiroz,et al. Characterizing the diversity of sweetpotato through growth parameters and leaf traits: Precocity and light use efficiency as important ordination factors , 2017 .
[61] Robin Thompson,et al. The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches , 2005, The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[62] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems , 2005 .
[63] M. Sillanpää,et al. Dynamic Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Plant Phenomic Data. , 2015, Trends in plant science.
[64] M. Cooper,et al. Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of breeding for yield in the US Corn Belt [Zea mays L.] , 2006 .
[65] T. Iizumi,et al. Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of a large-scale crop model for paddy rice: Application of a Bayesian approach , 2009 .
[66] D. A. Kenny,et al. Correlation and Causation. , 1982 .
[67] Natural variation of YELLOW SEEDLING1 affects photosynthetic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2017, Nature Communications.
[68] F. Tardieu. Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. , 2003, Trends in plant science.
[69] Johanna A Bac-Molenaar,et al. Genome-wide association mapping of time-dependent growth responses to moderate drought stress in Arabidopsis. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.
[70] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Sorghum Crop Modeling and Its Utility in Agronomy and Breeding , 2016 .
[71] Frank Technow,et al. Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2015, bioRxiv.
[72] Greg McLean,et al. Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.
[73] Sanjoy Das,et al. Flowering time control: gene network modelling and the link to quantitative genetics , 2005 .
[74] S. Chapman,et al. Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.
[75] Xinyou Yin,et al. Can exploiting natural genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis contribute to increasing rice productivity? A simulation analysis. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.
[76] Björn Usadel,et al. Genetic architecture of plant stress resistance: multi‐trait genome‐wide association mapping , 2016, New Phytologist.
[77] Paul H. C. Eilers,et al. Fast smoothing parameter separation in multidimensional generalized P-splines: the SAP algorithm , 2014, Statistics and Computing.
[78] S. Grandillo,et al. Identification of Loci Affecting Accumulation of Secondary Metabolites in Tomato Fruit of a Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum chmielewskii Introgression Line Population , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..
[79] Deniz Akdemir,et al. Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[80] M. Sillanpää,et al. Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.
[81] Brian R. Cullis,et al. On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data , 2006 .
[82] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Molecular Breeding for Complex Adaptive Traits: How Integrating Crop Ecophysiology and Modelling Can Enhance Efficiency , 2016 .
[83] S. Chapman,et al. Dynamic monitoring of NDVI in wheat agronomy and breeding trials using an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .
[84] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. A Mixed-Model Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis for Multiple-Environment Trial Data Using Environmental Covariables for QTL-by-Environment Interactions, With an Example in Maize , 2007, Genetics.
[85] R. Visser,et al. QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato , 2006, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[86] G. Hammer,et al. Simulating daily field crop canopy photosynthesis: an integrated software package. , 2017, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[87] A. Walter,et al. Image based phenotyping during winter: a powerful tool to assess wheat genetic variation in growth response to temperature. , 2015, Functional plant biology : FPB.
[88] J. Basnayake,et al. Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Variation in stomatal conductance and its genetic correlation with crop productivity. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.
[89] David J Balding,et al. Multiple Quantitative Trait Analysis Using Bayesian Networks , 2014, Genetics.
[90] Victor O. Sadras,et al. Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy , 2009 .
[91] Guilherme J M Rosa,et al. Searching for Recursive Causal Structures in Multivariate Quantitative Genetics Mixed Models , 2010, Genetics.
[92] F. Gumedze,et al. Parameter estimation and inference in the linear mixed model , 2011 .
[93] J. Poland,et al. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[94] B. Yandell,et al. Inferring Causal Phenotype Networks From Segregating Populations , 2008, Genetics.
[95] R. Wu,et al. Functional mapping — how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[96] C. Stokes,et al. Sugarcane for water-limited environments: enhanced capability of the APSIM sugarcane model for assessing traits for transpiration efficiency and root water supply , 2016 .
[97] Frank Technow,et al. Leveraging biological insight and environmental variation to improve phenotypic prediction: Integrating crop growth models (CGM) with whole genome prediction (WGP) , 2017, bioRxiv.
[98] A. Melchinger,et al. Maximizing the Reliability of Genomic Selection by Optimizing the Calibration Set of Reference Individuals: Comparison of Methods in Two Diverse Groups of Maize Inbreds (Zea mays L.) , 2012, Genetics.
[99] Peter M Visscher,et al. Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Longitudinal Quantitative Trait Data in Complex Pedigrees , 2005, Genetics.
[100] T. Pridmore,et al. Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge , 2017, Current Biology.
[101] V. Allard,et al. Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[102] M. Cooper,et al. Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[103] G. Hammer,et al. Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.
[104] José Crossa,et al. Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers , 2010, Genetics.
[105] Martin J. Kropff,et al. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding , 2003 .
[106] Phillip Jackson,et al. Selection of sugarcane families across variable environments. I. Sources of variation and an optimal selection index , 1995 .
[107] Paul H. C. Eilers,et al. Twenty years of P-splines , 2015 .
[108] Greg J. Rebetzke,et al. Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat , 1999 .
[109] María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez,et al. Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[110] G. Molenberghs,et al. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .
[111] F. Tardieu,et al. Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.
[112] M. Yamasaki,et al. Uncovering a Nuisance Influence of a Phenological Trait of Plants Using a Nonlinear Structural Equation: Application to Days to Heading and Culm Length in Asian Cultivated Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) , 2016, PloS one.
[113] Chenwu Xu,et al. Prediction and association mapping of agronomic traits in maize using multiple omic data , 2017, Heredity.
[114] M. Lund,et al. Detection and modelling of time-dependent QTL in animal populations , 2008, Genetics Selection Evolution.
[115] N. Alimi. Statistical methods for QTL mapping and genomic prediction of multiple traits and environments: case studies in pepper , 2016 .
[116] Dean W. Podlich,et al. Mapping As You Go , 2004 .
[117] G. Bollero,et al. Modeling Rye and Hairy Vetch Residue Decomposition as a Function of Degree-Days and Decomposition-Days , 2003 .
[118] K. Chenu,et al. Large-scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent-wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt--spatial and temporal trends. , 2013, The New phytologist.
[119] Pedro J. Navarro,et al. Plant phenomics: an overview of image acquisition technologies and image data analysis algorithms , 2017, GigaScience.
[120] Mark Kirkpatrick,et al. Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[121] Johannes A. Postma,et al. Modelling root plasticity and response of narrow-leafed lupin to heterogeneous phosphorus supply , 2013, Plant and Soil.
[122] V. Allard,et al. Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.
[123] Ky L. Mathews,et al. Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.
[124] B. Yandell,et al. CAUSAL GRAPHICAL MODELS IN SYSTEMS GENETICS: A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT INFERENCE OF CAUSAL NETWORK AND GENETIC ARCHITECTURE FOR CORRELATED PHENOTYPES. , 2010, The annals of applied statistics.
[125] R. C. Muchow,et al. Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. , 1990 .
[126] Rongling Wu,et al. A logistic mixture model for characterizing genetic determinants causing differentiation in growth trajectories. , 2002, Genetical research.
[127] S. Müller,et al. Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models , 2013, 1306.2427.
[128] J. Postma,et al. Impact of axial root growth angles on nitrogen acquisition in maize depends on environmental conditions. , 2016, Annals of botany.
[129] JC Bowman,et al. Genotype × environment interactions , 1972, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.
[130] Xinyou Yin,et al. Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley , 2000, Heredity.
[131] Ron Smith,et al. Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. , 2005, Tree physiology.
[132] Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al. Prediction of grain yield using reflectance spectra of canopy and leaves in maize plants grown under different water regimes , 2012 .
[133] Mark E. Cooper,et al. Gene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics , 2005 .
[134] Paul C. Struik,et al. Statistical models for genotype by environment data: from conventional ANOVA models to eco-physiological QTL models , 2005 .
[135] José Crossa,et al. Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values when Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction using Pedigree and Dense Molecular Markers , 2012 .
[136] Stephen M. Welch,et al. A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003 .
[137] F. Tardieu,et al. The growths of leaves, shoots, roots and reproductive organs partly share their genetic control in maize plants. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.
[138] I Misztal,et al. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.
[139] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.
[140] R. Doerge,et al. Selecting Informative Traits for Multivariate Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Helps to Gain Optimal Power , 2013, Genetics.
[141] F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al. A New Method to Infer Causal Phenotype Networks Using QTL and Phenotypic Information , 2014, PloS one.
[142] Hanno Scharr,et al. Leaf segmentation in plant phenotyping: a collation study , 2016, Machine Vision and Applications.
[143] L. Totir,et al. Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.
[144] K. Chenu,et al. Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Wheat Plant Traits across Environments by Combining Crop Modeling and Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2015, PloS one.
[145] C. Fournier,et al. High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[146] Peter Bühlmann,et al. Predicting causal effects in large-scale systems from observational data , 2010, Nature Methods.
[147] D. Woodruff,et al. A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among genotypes , 1995, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[148] M. Zaman-Allah,et al. Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain , 2018, Trends in plant science.
[149] K. Wardenaar,et al. An investigation of emotion dynamics in major depressive disorder patients and healthy persons using sparse longitudinal networks , 2017, PloS one.
[150] M. Malosetti,et al. What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × Environment interactions? , 2016 .
[151] Frank Technow,et al. Use of Crop Growth Models with Whole-Genome Prediction: Application to a Maize Multienvironment Trial , 2016 .
[152] Michelle Watt,et al. OpenSimRoot: widening the scope and application of root architectural models , 2017, The New phytologist.
[153] Graeme L. Hammer,et al. Linking biophysical and genetic models to integrate physiology, molecular biology and plant breeding , 2002 .
[154] John M. Antle,et al. Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Information and communication technology , 2017, Agricultural systems.
[155] F. Baret,et al. Estimation of Wheat Plant Density at Early Stages Using High Resolution Imagery , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..
[156] Kenneth A. Bollen,et al. Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .
[157] D. A. Kenny,et al. Correlation and Causation , 1937, Wilmott.