Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding.

New types of phenotyping tools generate large amounts of data on many aspects of plant physiology and morphology with high spatial and temporal resolution. These new phenotyping data are potentially useful to improve understanding and prediction of complex traits, like yield, that are characterized by strong environmental context dependencies, i.e., genotype by environment interactions. For an evaluation of the utility of new phenotyping information, we will look at how this information can be incorporated in different classes of genotype-to-phenotype (G2P) models. G2P models predict phenotypic traits as functions of genotypic and environmental inputs. In the last decade, access to high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNPs) and sequence information has boosted the development of a class of G2P models called genomic prediction models that predict phenotypes from genome wide marker profiles. The challenge now is to build G2P models that incorporate simultaneously extensive genomic information alongside with new phenotypic information. Beyond the modification of existing G2P models, new G2P paradigms are required. We present candidate G2P models for the integration of genomic and new phenotyping information and illustrate their use in examples. Special attention will be given to the modelling of genotype by environment interactions. The G2P models provide a framework for model based phenotyping and the evaluation of the utility of phenotyping information in the context of breeding programs.

[1]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[2]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User''s Guide to Path Analysis , 2016 .

[3]  Lorena González Pérez,et al.  Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[4]  R. Woltereck,et al.  Weitere experimentelle untersuchungen über Artänderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden , 1913, Zeitschrift für induktive Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.

[5]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[6]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Yield in Europe: Allelic Effects Vary with Drought and Heat Scenarios1[OPEN] , 2016, Plant Physiology.

[7]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Multi-Spectral Imaging from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Enables the Assessment of Seasonal Leaf Area Dynamics of Sorghum Breeding Lines , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[8]  Fabio Fiorani,et al.  Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[9]  C. Messina,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Floral Transition of the Shoot Apex in Maize and Its Dynamic Modeling , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  G. Casella,et al.  Functional mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying the character process: a theoretical framework. , 2002, Genetics.

[11]  G. Hammer,et al.  Using crop simulation to generate genotype by environment interaction effects for sorghum in water-limited environments , 2002 .

[12]  Bridging the genotype–phenotype gap in 3D , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[13]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Correcting for spatial heterogeneity in plant breeding experiments with P-splines , 2018 .

[14]  Christian Fournier,et al.  Distinct controls of leaf widening and elongation by light and evaporative demand in maize. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[15]  W. Kruijer,et al.  Phenomics for photosynthesis, growth and reflectance in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals circadian and long-term fluctuations in heritability , 2016, Plant Methods.

[16]  Stephen M. Welch,et al.  A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in , 2003 .

[17]  Takeshi Hayashi,et al.  Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[18]  F. Baret,et al.  What is cost-efficient phenotyping? Optimizing costs for different scenarios. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[19]  Fred A. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Predicting responses in multiple environments : Issues in relation to genotype × Environment interactions , 2016 .

[20]  Lianhai Wu,et al.  Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[21]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties , 1996 .

[22]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Predictable 'meta-mechanisms' emerge from feedbacks between transpiration and plant growth and cannot be simply deduced from short-term mechanisms. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[24]  Dynamics of senescence-related QTLs in potato , 2012, Euphytica.

[25]  C. Juday Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziel über das Wesen quantitativer Artuntershiede bei Daphniden , 1910 .

[26]  David Da Silva,et al.  Using numerical plant models and phenotypic correlation space to design achievable ideotypes. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[27]  K. Mather,et al.  Genotype X environment interactions. II. Some genetical considerations. , 1975, Heredity.

[28]  Walid Sadok,et al.  Linking physiological and genetic analyses of the control of leaf growth under changing environmental conditions , 2005 .

[29]  F. Tardieu,et al.  A Common Genetic Determinism for Sensitivities to Soil Water Deficit and Evaporative Demand: Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci and Introgression Lines of Maize1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[30]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Detection and use of QTL for complex traits in multiple environments. , 2010, Current opinion in plant biology.

[31]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Methods for causal inference from gene perturbation experiments and validation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  G. Hammer,et al.  Characterizing drought stress and trait influence on maize yield under current and future conditions , 2014, Global change biology.

[33]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Multiple-Trait Genomic Selection Methods Increase Genetic Value Prediction Accuracy , 2012, Genetics.

[34]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes , 1991, Euphytica.

[35]  C. Klukas,et al.  Dissecting spatiotemporal biomass accumulation in barley under different water regimes using high-throughput image analysis. , 2015, Plant, cell & environment.

[36]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms , 2017 .

[37]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Genomic regions for canopy temperature and their genetic association with stomatal conductance and grain yield in wheat. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[38]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment , 2014 .

[39]  Roland Chapuis,et al.  Resiliences to water deficit in a phenotyping platform and in the field: How related are they in maize? , 2012 .

[40]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Improvement of Predictive Ability by Uniform Coverage of the Target Genetic Space , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[41]  I. Misztal,et al.  Properties of random regression models using linear splines. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[42]  Jean-Marcel Ribaut,et al.  The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis , 2013, Front. Physiol..

[43]  Yusheng Zhao,et al.  Multiple-trait- and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes , 2015, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[44]  José Crossa,et al.  A multi-trait multi-environment QTL mixed model with an application to drought and nitrogen stress trials in maize (Zea mays L.) , 2008, Euphytica.

[45]  Baskar Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  A real-time phenotyping framework using machine learning for plant stress severity rating in soybean , 2017, Plant Methods.

[46]  J. Araus,et al.  Kernel δ18O reflects changes in apical dominance and plant transpiration in tropical maize , 2017 .

[47]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation variety trials , 1998 .

[48]  José Crossa,et al.  Multitrait, Random Regression, or Simple Repeatability Model in High‐Throughput Phenotyping Data Improve Genomic Prediction for Wheat Grain Yield , 2017, The plant genome.

[49]  R. Quiroz,et al.  Linking process-based potato models with light reflectance data: Does model complexity enhance yield prediction accuracy? , 2017 .

[50]  Carina Moeller,et al.  A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[51]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for ontogenetic growth , 2001, Nature.

[52]  W. Kruijer,et al.  Genotype-phenotype modeling considering intermediate level of biological variation: a case study involving sensory traits, metabolites and QTLs in ripe tomatoes. , 2015, Molecular bioSystems.

[53]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement , 1996 .

[54]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Root phenotyping: from component trait in the lab to breeding. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[55]  F. A. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[56]  D. Gianola,et al.  Bayesian Networks Illustrate Genomic and Residual Trait Connections in Maize (Zea mays L.) , 2017, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[57]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity : functional and conceptual approaches , 2004 .

[58]  Huwaida S. Rabie,et al.  Combining field performance with controlled environment plant imaging to identify the genetic control of growth and transpiration underlying yield response to water-deficit stress in wheat , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[59]  José Crossa,et al.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[60]  R. Quiroz,et al.  Characterizing the diversity of sweetpotato through growth parameters and leaf traits: Precocity and light use efficiency as important ordination factors , 2017 .

[61]  Robin Thompson,et al.  The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches , 2005, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[62]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems , 2005 .

[63]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Dynamic Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Plant Phenomic Data. , 2015, Trends in plant science.

[64]  M. Cooper,et al.  Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of breeding for yield in the US Corn Belt [Zea mays L.] , 2006 .

[65]  T. Iizumi,et al.  Parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis of a large-scale crop model for paddy rice: Application of a Bayesian approach , 2009 .

[66]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and Causation. , 1982 .

[67]  Natural variation of YELLOW SEEDLING1 affects photosynthetic acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2017, Nature Communications.

[68]  F. Tardieu Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[69]  Johanna A Bac-Molenaar,et al.  Genome-wide association mapping of time-dependent growth responses to moderate drought stress in Arabidopsis. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[70]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Sorghum Crop Modeling and Its Utility in Agronomy and Breeding , 2016 .

[71]  Frank Technow,et al.  Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2015, bioRxiv.

[72]  Greg McLean,et al.  Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[73]  Sanjoy Das,et al.  Flowering time control: gene network modelling and the link to quantitative genetics , 2005 .

[74]  S. Chapman,et al.  Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes , 2016, Journal of experimental botany.

[75]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Can exploiting natural genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis contribute to increasing rice productivity? A simulation analysis. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.

[76]  Björn Usadel,et al.  Genetic architecture of plant stress resistance: multi‐trait genome‐wide association mapping , 2016, New Phytologist.

[77]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Fast smoothing parameter separation in multidimensional generalized P-splines: the SAP algorithm , 2014, Statistics and Computing.

[78]  S. Grandillo,et al.  Identification of Loci Affecting Accumulation of Secondary Metabolites in Tomato Fruit of a Solanum lycopersicum × Solanum chmielewskii Introgression Line Population , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[79]  Deniz Akdemir,et al.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[80]  M. Sillanpää,et al.  Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[81]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data , 2006 .

[82]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Molecular Breeding for Complex Adaptive Traits: How Integrating Crop Ecophysiology and Modelling Can Enhance Efficiency , 2016 .

[83]  S. Chapman,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of NDVI in wheat agronomy and breeding trials using an unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .

[84]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  A Mixed-Model Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis for Multiple-Environment Trial Data Using Environmental Covariables for QTL-by-Environment Interactions, With an Example in Maize , 2007, Genetics.

[85]  R. Visser,et al.  QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato , 2006, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[86]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating daily field crop canopy photosynthesis: an integrated software package. , 2017, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[87]  A. Walter,et al.  Image based phenotyping during winter: a powerful tool to assess wheat genetic variation in growth response to temperature. , 2015, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[88]  J. Basnayake,et al.  Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Variation in stomatal conductance and its genetic correlation with crop productivity. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[89]  David J Balding,et al.  Multiple Quantitative Trait Analysis Using Bayesian Networks , 2014, Genetics.

[90]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy , 2009 .

[91]  Guilherme J M Rosa,et al.  Searching for Recursive Causal Structures in Multivariate Quantitative Genetics Mixed Models , 2010, Genetics.

[92]  F. Gumedze,et al.  Parameter estimation and inference in the linear mixed model , 2011 .

[93]  J. Poland,et al.  Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection , 2014, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[94]  B. Yandell,et al.  Inferring Causal Phenotype Networks From Segregating Populations , 2008, Genetics.

[95]  R. Wu,et al.  Functional mapping — how to map and study the genetic architecture of dynamic complex traits , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[96]  C. Stokes,et al.  Sugarcane for water-limited environments: enhanced capability of the APSIM sugarcane model for assessing traits for transpiration efficiency and root water supply , 2016 .

[97]  Frank Technow,et al.  Leveraging biological insight and environmental variation to improve phenotypic prediction: Integrating crop growth models (CGM) with whole genome prediction (WGP) , 2017, bioRxiv.

[98]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Maximizing the Reliability of Genomic Selection by Optimizing the Calibration Set of Reference Individuals: Comparison of Methods in Two Diverse Groups of Maize Inbreds (Zea mays L.) , 2012, Genetics.

[99]  Peter M Visscher,et al.  Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Longitudinal Quantitative Trait Data in Complex Pedigrees , 2005, Genetics.

[100]  T. Pridmore,et al.  Plant Phenomics, From Sensors to Knowledge , 2017, Current Biology.

[101]  V. Allard,et al.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[102]  M. Cooper,et al.  Relationships among analytical methods used to study genotypic variation and genotype-by-environment interaction in plant breeding multi-environment experiments , 1994, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[103]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.

[104]  José Crossa,et al.  Prediction of Genetic Values of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding Using Pedigree and Molecular Markers , 2010, Genetics.

[105]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding , 2003 .

[106]  Phillip Jackson,et al.  Selection of sugarcane families across variable environments. I. Sources of variation and an optimal selection index , 1995 .

[107]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Twenty years of P-splines , 2015 .

[108]  Greg J. Rebetzke,et al.  Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat , 1999 .

[109]  María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez,et al.  Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[110]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .

[111]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[112]  M. Yamasaki,et al.  Uncovering a Nuisance Influence of a Phenological Trait of Plants Using a Nonlinear Structural Equation: Application to Days to Heading and Culm Length in Asian Cultivated Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) , 2016, PloS one.

[113]  Chenwu Xu,et al.  Prediction and association mapping of agronomic traits in maize using multiple omic data , 2017, Heredity.

[114]  M. Lund,et al.  Detection and modelling of time-dependent QTL in animal populations , 2008, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[115]  N. Alimi Statistical methods for QTL mapping and genomic prediction of multiple traits and environments: case studies in pepper , 2016 .

[116]  Dean W. Podlich,et al.  Mapping As You Go , 2004 .

[117]  G. Bollero,et al.  Modeling Rye and Hairy Vetch Residue Decomposition as a Function of Degree-Days and Decomposition-Days , 2003 .

[118]  K. Chenu,et al.  Large-scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent-wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt--spatial and temporal trends. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[119]  Pedro J. Navarro,et al.  Plant phenomics: an overview of image acquisition technologies and image data analysis algorithms , 2017, GigaScience.

[120]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[121]  Johannes A. Postma,et al.  Modelling root plasticity and response of narrow-leafed lupin to heterogeneous phosphorus supply , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[122]  V. Allard,et al.  Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[123]  Ky L. Mathews,et al.  Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype-environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[124]  B. Yandell,et al.  CAUSAL GRAPHICAL MODELS IN SYSTEMS GENETICS: A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT INFERENCE OF CAUSAL NETWORK AND GENETIC ARCHITECTURE FOR CORRELATED PHENOTYPES. , 2010, The annals of applied statistics.

[125]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Temperature and solar radiation effects on potential maize yield across locations. , 1990 .

[126]  Rongling Wu,et al.  A logistic mixture model for characterizing genetic determinants causing differentiation in growth trajectories. , 2002, Genetical research.

[127]  S. Müller,et al.  Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models , 2013, 1306.2427.

[128]  J. Postma,et al.  Impact of axial root growth angles on nitrogen acquisition in maize depends on environmental conditions. , 2016, Annals of botany.

[129]  JC Bowman,et al.  Genotype × environment interactions , 1972, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.

[130]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Coupling estimated effects of QTLs for physiological traits to a crop growth model: predicting yield variation among recombinant inbred lines in barley , 2000, Heredity.

[131]  Ron Smith,et al.  Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[132]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Prediction of grain yield using reflectance spectra of canopy and leaves in maize plants grown under different water regimes , 2012 .

[133]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Gene-to-phenotype models and complex trait genetics , 2005 .

[134]  Paul C. Struik,et al.  Statistical models for genotype by environment data: from conventional ANOVA models to eco-physiological QTL models , 2005 .

[135]  José Crossa,et al.  Genomic Prediction of Breeding Values when Modeling Genotype × Environment Interaction using Pedigree and Dense Molecular Markers , 2012 .

[136]  Stephen M. Welch,et al.  A Genetic Neural Network Model of Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003 .

[137]  F. Tardieu,et al.  The growths of leaves, shoots, roots and reproductive organs partly share their genetic control in maize plants. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[138]  I Misztal,et al.  A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[139]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Crop design for specific adaptation in variable dryland production environments , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[140]  R. Doerge,et al.  Selecting Informative Traits for Multivariate Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Helps to Gain Optimal Power , 2013, Genetics.

[141]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  A New Method to Infer Causal Phenotype Networks Using QTL and Phenotypic Information , 2014, PloS one.

[142]  Hanno Scharr,et al.  Leaf segmentation in plant phenotyping: a collation study , 2016, Machine Vision and Applications.

[143]  L. Totir,et al.  Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[144]  K. Chenu,et al.  Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Wheat Plant Traits across Environments by Combining Crop Modeling and Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[145]  C. Fournier,et al.  High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[146]  Peter Bühlmann,et al.  Predicting causal effects in large-scale systems from observational data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[147]  D. Woodruff,et al.  A selection strategy to accommodate genotype-by-environment interaction for grain yield of wheat: managed-environments for selection among genotypes , 1995, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[148]  M. Zaman-Allah,et al.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[149]  K. Wardenaar,et al.  An investigation of emotion dynamics in major depressive disorder patients and healthy persons using sparse longitudinal networks , 2017, PloS one.

[150]  M. Malosetti,et al.  What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × Environment interactions? , 2016 .

[151]  Frank Technow,et al.  Use of Crop Growth Models with Whole-Genome Prediction: Application to a Maize Multienvironment Trial , 2016 .

[152]  Michelle Watt,et al.  OpenSimRoot: widening the scope and application of root architectural models , 2017, The New phytologist.

[153]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Linking biophysical and genetic models to integrate physiology, molecular biology and plant breeding , 2002 .

[154]  John M. Antle,et al.  Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: Information and communication technology , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[155]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimation of Wheat Plant Density at Early Stages Using High Resolution Imagery , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[156]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[157]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and Causation , 1937, Wilmott.