A simple theory and evidence on the determinants of firm R&D

This paper derives a simple, but informative, model of firm R&D to figure out key factors that determine firm R&D effort. The model suggests a demand-pull, technology-push theory of R&D by showing that a firm's profit-maximizing R&D expenditure is determined jointly by both demand-side factors and technology-side factors. The former includes demand size (firm sales) and consumer preference over quality and price and the latter includes R&D cost structure or the production-cost effect of product R&D and firm-specific technological competence. In addition, the model shows that other things being equal, the stock of exogenous technological knowledge, including the firm's previously accumulated technological knowledge, relevant to current R&D which is negatively related with current R&D effort. An empirical analysis of firm R&D intensities and technological capabilities of more than 1600 firms in nine industries across six countries provides supportive evidence for the theory. Further, the theory implies that R&D intensity or the R&D-to-sales ratio is independent of firm size unless firm size affects technological competence and that given consumer preference and R&D cost structure facing all firms in the same industry, the distribution of firm-specific technological competence among firms determines the distribution of firm R&D intensities within the industry.

[1]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[2]  L. Davis American economic growth : an economist's history of the United States , 1974 .

[3]  N. Rosenberg Science, Invention and Economic Growth , 1974 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[5]  R. Dorfman,et al.  Optimal Advertising and Optimal Quality , 1976 .

[6]  D. Needham Market Structure and Firms' R & D Behavior , 1975 .

[7]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[8]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[9]  Chang‐Yang Lee A simple model of R&D: An extension of the Dorfman-Steiner theorem , 2002 .

[10]  Melvin R. Goldman Technology Institutions and Policies: Their Role in Developing Technological Capability in Industry , 1997 .

[11]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[12]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[13]  Michael Waterson,et al.  Economic theory of the industry , 1984 .

[14]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[15]  F. Scherer,et al.  Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited , 1982 .

[16]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Economic Sources of Inventive Activity , 1962, The Journal of Economic History.

[17]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions , 1992 .

[18]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[19]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses , 1985 .

[20]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .