Uncertainty quantification for multidisciplinary launch vehicle design using model order reduction and spectral methods

Abstract The early design phase of launch vehicles often involves low fidelity models that are characterized by a high level of modeling uncertainties. These uncertainties have to be propagated into the whole design process in order to ensure the robustness of the found vehicle architecture. Launch vehicle design involves trajectory optimization that induces a large computational cost for the uncertainty propagation phase using nested loop approach (outer uncertainty loop and inner optimal control loop). In this paper, a methodology is proposed in order to build a surrogate model of the uncertainty propagation phase on the trajectory optimization in order to carry out the uncertainty quantification at a reduced cost. The proposed approach couples reduced order model and spectral methods in order to allow to generate optimal launch vehicle trajectories as functions of the input uncertainties. The method is applied to two-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle design in several uncertainty quantification analyses (reliability analysis, sensitivity analysis, quantile estimation).

[1]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[2]  Nathan Halko,et al.  An Algorithm for the Principal Component Analysis of Large Data Sets , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[4]  P. Nair,et al.  Aircraft Robust Trajectory Optimization Using Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos , 2014 .

[5]  N. Wiener The Homogeneous Chaos , 1938 .

[6]  Loïc Brevault,et al.  Decoupled Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Formulation for Interdisciplinary Coupling Satisfaction Under Uncertainty , 2016 .

[7]  Mathieu Balesdent,et al.  Uncertainty-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (UMDO) , 2020 .

[8]  Loic Brevault,et al.  Overview of Gaussian process based multi-fidelity techniques with variable relationship between fidelities , 2020, ArXiv.

[9]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[10]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Reducing the Time Complexity of the Derandomized Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES) , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Loïc Brevault,et al.  Multi-Objective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approach for Partially Reusable Launch Vehicle Design , 2020 .

[12]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  Title: Open TURNS: An industrial software for uncertainty quantification in simulation , 2015, 1501.05242.

[13]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Trajectory Optimization under Uncertainty based on Polynomial Chaos Expansion , 2015 .

[15]  Mahdi Jafari,et al.  Robust Optimum Trajectory Design of a Satellite Launch Vehicle in the presence of Uncertainties , 2020 .

[16]  Loïc Brevault,et al.  Aerospace System Analysis and Optimization in Uncertainty , 2020 .

[17]  M. Eldred Recent Advances in Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos and Stochastic Collocation Methods for Uncertainty Analysis and Design , 2009 .

[18]  Loic Le Gratiet,et al.  Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes , 2016, 1606.04273.

[19]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical ExperienceSensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Mathematical Models. Numerical Experience , 1995 .

[20]  R. Askey,et al.  Some basic hypergeometric orthogonal polynomials that generalize Jacobi polynomials , 1985 .

[21]  J. Betts Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization , 1998 .

[22]  Roger G. Ghanem,et al.  Physical Systems with Random Uncertainties: Chaos Representations with Arbitrary Probability Measure , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[23]  Raktim Bhattacharya,et al.  Optimal Trajectory Generation With Probabilistic System Uncertainty Using Polynomial Chaos , 2011 .

[24]  J. Renaud Numerical Optimization, Theoretical and Practical Aspects— , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  Sanford Gordon,et al.  Computer program for calculating and fitting thermodynamic functions , 1992 .

[26]  Anupriya Gogna,et al.  Metaheuristics: review and application , 2013, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[27]  M. Jansen Analysis of variance designs for model output , 1999 .

[28]  Francesco Castellini Multidisciplinary design optimization for expendable launch vehicles , 2012 .

[29]  Sebastien Defoort,et al.  Conceptual design of disruptive aircraft configurations based on High-Fidelity OAD process , 2018, 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference.

[30]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[31]  Shuxing Yang,et al.  Robust trajectory optimization using polynomial chaos and convex optimization , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[32]  Pol D. Spanos,et al.  Spectral Stochastic Finite-Element Formulation for Reliability Analysis , 1991 .

[33]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  OpenMDAO: an open-source framework for multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization , 2019, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[34]  Abdelhamid Chriette,et al.  A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design , 2012 .