Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices

The capability to establish boundary‐spanning practices within and across organizations has for long been recognized as a key strategic resource. As organizations are becoming distributed and dynamic, they will be increasingly populated by multiple functional, geographical, hierarchical and professional boundaries. The inherent complexity of such settings makes it difficult for organizations to leverage their boundary‐spanning practices. Information technology (IT) systems have been hailed as a critical enabler of boundary spanning. However, there is little knowledge on how organizations are affected by the introduction of different types of IT systems. Building on an interpretive case study of Swedish transport organizations, this paper explores consequences of sensor technology for boundary spanning. The paper contributes with an understanding of what coexisting use contexts mean for boundary‐spanning practices. A theoretical implication is that such multi‐contextuality requires an integrative view on boundary spanning that combines insights from the organizational innovation and work practice literatures.

[1]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Characteristics and External Orientation of Boundary Spanning Individuals. , 1979 .

[2]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environments , 2002, CACM.

[3]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Boundless and bounded interactions in the knowledge work process: the role of groupware technologies , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[7]  A. Giddens.  NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[8]  Veronica Hope Hailey,et al.  Managing Change across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices , 2005 .

[9]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Information Specificity and Environmental Scanning: An Economic Perspective , 1997, MIS Q..

[10]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[11]  Ulrika H. Westergren,et al.  Technologies for value creation: An exploration of embedded systems use in a business model context , 2004 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[13]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[14]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[16]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[17]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[18]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Bridging User Organizations: Knowledge Brokering and the Work of Information Technology Professionals , 2004, MIS Q..

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  R Leifer,et al.  Organizational/environmental interchange: a model of boundary spanning activity. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[22]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Andrew E. Fano,et al.  The future of business services in the age of ubiquitous computing , 2002, CACM.

[24]  Patricia Voydanoff,et al.  Consequences of boundary-spanning demands and resources for work-to-family conflict and perceived stress. , 2005, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[25]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[27]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Group dynamics and ubiquitous computing , 2002, CACM.

[28]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[30]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Power and influence of the human resources function through boundary spanning and information management , 1998 .

[31]  Y. Lacasse,et al.  From the authors , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Editorial: Social impacts of ubiquitous computing: Exploring critical interactions between mobility, context and technology , 2005 .

[34]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Research Commentary: An Agenda for Information Technology Research in Heterogeneous and Distributed Environments , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Stephen Shaoyi Liao,et al.  Intelligent agents and financial risk monitoring systems , 2002, CACM.

[36]  M. Tushman,et al.  Characteristics and External Orientations of Boundary Spanning Individuals , 1981 .

[37]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Boundary spanning interfaces between logistics, production, marketing and new product development , 1996 .

[38]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi-contextuality in ubiquitous computing: Investigating the car case through action research , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[39]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  The Mobile–Stationary Divide in Ubiquitous Computing Environments: Lessons from the Transport Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[40]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Social impacts of ubiquitous computing: Exploring critical interactions between mobility, context and technology: A Special Issue for Information and Organization , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[41]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[42]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..