Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode

BACKGROUND In subjects with remaining low frequency hearing, combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapeutic perspective. Intracochlear introduction of a cochlear implant electrode, however, may alter the biomechanical properties of the inner ear and thus affect perception of acoustic stimuli. STUDY DESIGN Based on histological observations of morphologic changes after cochlear implantation in cadaveric and post mortem studies the effects of basilar membrane (BM) stiffening in the ascending basal and middle turns of the cochlea due to close contact of the BM with the electrode were simulated in a 3D-computational finite element model of the inner ear. To verify our simulated results, pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiograms of 13 subjects with substantial residual hearing, who underwent cochlear implantation, were evaluated. RESULTS In the scenario of partial BM-fixation, acoustic energy of middle (2 kHz) and high (6 kHz) frequency was focused basally and apically to the fixed section, increasing BM displacement amplitudes up to 6 dB at a stimulation level of 94 dB (SPL). Lower frequencies were not affected by fixation in the basal and middle turn of the cochlea. In implanted subjects, a small but significant decrease of thresholds was observed at 1.5 kHz, a place in tonotopy adjacent to the tip region of the implanted electrode. CONCLUSION Our model suggests that stiffening of the basilar membrane adjacent to an implanted electrode into the basal and middle cochlear turn did not affect BM movement in the low frequency area. Focussing of acoustic energy may increase perception in regions adjacent to the fixed section. Observations in implanted subjects were concordant with our model predictions. High frequencies, however, should not be amplified in patients using EAS to avoid disturbances in discrimination due to tonotopically incorrect frequency representation.

[1]  J. Nadol,et al.  Histologic Evaluation of the Tissue Seal and Biologic Response Around Cochlear Implant Electrodes in the Human , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  B. Reimer,et al.  Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  Frank Böhnke,et al.  3D-Finite Element Modelof the Human Cochlea Including Fluid-Structure Couplings , 1999, ORL.

[5]  C von Ilberg,et al.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. , 1999, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[6]  L. Voldřich,et al.  Mechanical properties of basilar membrane. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  A. Eshraghi,et al.  Comparative Study of Cochlear Damage With Three Perimodiolar Electrode Designs , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of Residual Hearing in Children and Post-Lingually Deafened Adults after Cochlear Implantation: An Initial Study , 2002, ORL.

[9]  H Plenk,et al.  [Intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes]. , 2000, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[10]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[11]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 1999, ORL.

[12]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cochlear Implant Electrode Design for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[13]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[15]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[16]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Preservation of Basal Inner Ear Structures in Cochlear Implantation , 2005, ORL.