Policy transfer in critical perspective

The world of public policy is becoming increasingly small due to dramatic changes in global communications, political and economic institutional structures, and to nation states themselves. This article evaluates the implications of these changes and challenges for both the study and the practice of policy transfer and provides an understanding of the relationship between systemic globalizing forces and the increasing scope and intensity of policy transfer activity. It provides: an explanation of policy transfer as a process of organizational learning; an insight into how and why such processes are studied by policy scientists; and an evaluation of its use by policy practitioners. The article argues that the limits of policy transfer analysis as a descriptive, explanatory and prescriptive theory of policy change can be addressed through the development of a multi-level ‘action based’ approach to the study of policy transfer.

[1]  Mark Evans,et al.  Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[2]  M. Tonry.  Punishment and Politics , 2004 .

[3]  Paul Burton.  MODERNISING THE POLICY PROCESS , 2006 .

[4]  R. Rose.  Learning From Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[5]  O. James.  Business Models and the Transfer of Businesslike CentralGovernment Agencies , 2001 .

[6]  R. Common.  Public Management and Policy Transfer in Southeast Asia , 2000 .

[7]  S. Padgett.  Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector , 2003 .

[8]  Louise Shaxson,et al.  Is your evidence robust enough? Questions for policy makers and practitioners , 2005 .

[9]  Reidar Dale,et al.  The logical framework: An easy escape, a straitjacket, or a useful planning tool? , 2003 .

[10]  Des Gasper,et al.  Evaluating the "logical framework approach": towards learning-oriented development evaluation , 2000 .

[11]  P. May.  Policy Learning and Failure , 1992, Journal of Public Policy.

[12]  R. Common,et al.  Organisational learning in a political environment , 2004 .

[13]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis , 1986, Journal of Public Policy.

[14]  P. Haas.  Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and Mediterranean pollution control , 1989, International Organization.

[15]  Rosalie Koolhoven.  Good-enough governance , 2010 .

[16]  Patrick Dunleavy.  The Globalization of Public Services Production: Can Government be 'Best in World'? , 1994 .

[17]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[18]  D. Stone.  Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy across Time, Space and Disciplines , 1999 .

[19]  C. Bennett,et al.  What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It? , 1991, British Journal of Political Science.

[20]  Diane Stone,et al.  Banking on knowledge : the genesis of the Global Development Network , 2002 .

[21]  Oliver James,et al.  The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research , 2003 .

[22]  M. Evans.  Policy transfer in global perspective , 2004 .

[23]  G. Majone.  Cross-National Sources of Regulatory Policymaking in Europe and the United States , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[24]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[25]  E. Page,et al.  Future Governance and the Literature on Policy Transfer and Lesson Drawing , 2000 .

[26]  A. Clarke,et al.  The learning company , 1998 .

[27]  Tim Newburn,et al.  Learning from Uncle Sam? Exploring U.S. Influences on British Crime Control Policy , 2002 .

[28]  C. Hood.  Contemporary public management: a new global paradigm? , 1995 .

[29]  Claire A. Dunlop,et al.  Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities , 2009 .

[30]  Peter M. Haas,et al.  Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program , 1992, International Organization.

[31]  P. Cerny.  The dynamics of financial globalization: Technology, market structure, and policy response , 1994 .

[32]  P. Cerny,et al.  Globalisation and public policy under New Labour , 2004 .

[33]  Nanna Kildal.  Perspectives on Policy Transfer. The Case of the OECD , 2003 .

[34]  Philip G. Cerny,et al.  Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization , 1997 .

[35]  B. Peters.  Policy transfers between governments: The case of administrative reforms , 1997 .

[36]  E. Haas.  Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes , 1980, World Politics.

[37]  P. Haas.  Knowledge, power, and international policy coordination , 1997 .

[38]  M. Grindle.  Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[39]  E. Adler,et al.  Power in Global Governance: Knowledge in power: the epistemic construction of global governance , 2004 .

[40]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Lessons from Experience: Experiential Learning in Administrative Reforms in Eight Democracies , 1996 .

[41]  Peter C Smith,et al.  What works?Evidence-based policy and practice in public services , 2000 .

[42]  David Brian Robertson,et al.  Political Conflict and Lesson-Drawing , 1991, Journal of Public Policy.

[43]  S. Ladi.  Globalisation, Policy Transfer And Policy Research Institutes , 2005 .

[44]  South Eastern,et al.  Reviews of National Policies for Education , 2003 .

[45]  Jack L. Walker.  The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[46]  Alex Callinicos,et al.  An Anti-Capitalist Manifesto , 2003 .

[47]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[48]  R. Rhodes.  THE HOLLOWING OUT OF THE STATE: THE CHANGING NATURE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN BRITAIN , 1994 .

[49]  K. Dowding.  There Must Be End to Confusion: Policy Networks, Intellectual Fatigue, and the Need for Political Science Methods Courses in British Universities , 2001 .

[50]  D. Stone.  Non‐Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes , 2000 .

[51]  Thomas Risse-Kappen,et al.  Bringing Transnational Relations Back in: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions , 1995 .

[52]  Richard Rose,et al.  Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space , 1993 .

[53]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  British Employment Policy in the 1980s: Learning from the American Experience , 1997 .

[54]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Policy transfer and British social policy : learning from the USA? , 2000 .

[55]  Sucheen Patel.  Accounting for policy change through multi-level analysis: the reform of the Bank of England in the post-war era , 2009 .

[56]  H. Wolman,et al.  Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the US , 1992 .

[57]  Jeffery T. Ulmer.  Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime Control Policy , 2005 .

[58]  D. Stone.  Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process , 1996 .

[59]  W. Bion,et al.  Learning from experience , 2007 .

[60]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy‐Making , 2000 .

[61]  Michael Howlett.  Beyond Legalism? Policy Ideas, Implementation Styles and Emulation-Based Convergence in Canadian and U.S. Environmental Policy , 2000, Journal of Public Policy.

[62]  I. Greener.  Social learning and macroeconomic policy in Britain , 2001 .

[63]  Daniel Wincott.  Globalization and European Integration , 2000 .