Adaptive Multiple Subtraction Based on Sparse Coding

Multiple removal is one of the key steps in seismic data processing. In the surface-related multiple elimination method, the adaptive multiple subtraction technique is of great importance. In this paper, we propose a new pattern-based adaptive multiple subtraction method using the sparse coding technique (AMS-SC). By assuming that the multiples consist of different patterns from those of the primaries in the time-space domain, the proposed method first obtains some basis vectors, which represent the patterns of the multiples compactly, from the predicted multiples by sparse coding, and then estimates the multiples contained in the recorded seismic data using these basis vectors obtained in the previous step. Different from the traditional matching filter methods, which estimate the multiples by fitting the predicted multiples to the recorded seismic data directly, AMS-SC obtains the multiple estimations by reconstructing the recorded seismic data with the basis vectors obtained from the predicted multiples. Benefitting from sparse coding, AMS-SC is robust to the differences between the predicted and the true multiples, and preserves the primaries well. Applications on several data sets give some promising results of AMS-SC.

[1]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data , 2007, ICML '07.

[2]  Yanghua Wang,et al.  Multiple subtraction using an expanded multichannel matching filter , 2003 .

[3]  A. Guitton,et al.  Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the L1‐norm , 2004 .

[4]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  See all by looking at a few: Sparse modeling for finding representative objects , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, Part I: Theoretical considerations , 1997 .

[6]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Rajat Raina,et al.  Efficient sparse coding algorithms , 2006, NIPS.

[8]  William H. Dragoset,et al.  Some remarks on surface multiple attenuation , 1998 .

[9]  Wenkai Lu Adaptive multiple subtraction using independent component analysisAdaptive multiple subtraction using ICA , 2006 .

[10]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion; Part II, Practical aspects and examples , 1997 .

[11]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination , 1992 .

[12]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online dictionary learning for sparse coding , 2009, ICML '09.

[13]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Restoration of missing offsets by parabolic Radon transform1 , 1995 .

[14]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Sparselet Models for Efficient Multiclass Object Detection , 2012, ECCV.

[15]  Simon Spitz,et al.  Pattern recognition, spatial predictability, and subtraction of multiple events , 1999 .

[16]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Modeling of Human Actions from Motion Imagery , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  A. Ng Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance , 2004, Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04.

[19]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Non-local sparse models for image restoration , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[20]  Yihong Gong,et al.  Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification , 2009, CVPR.

[21]  Lei Liu,et al.  Adaptive multiple subtraction based on constrained independent component analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Modeling of Intrinsic Correspondences , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[23]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[24]  Laurent Duval,et al.  Adaptive multiple subtraction with wavelet-based complex unary Wiener filters , 2011, 1108.4674.

[25]  Graham W. Taylor,et al.  Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[26]  Michael Elad,et al.  Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Adaptive multiple subtraction using independent component analysis , 2005 .

[28]  Wenkai Lu,et al.  Adaptive multiple subtraction based on 3D blind separation of convolved mixtures , 2013 .

[29]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[30]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Task-Driven Dictionary Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  Kristopher A. Innanen,et al.  Adaptive separation of free-surface multiples through independent component analysis , 2008 .

[32]  Antoine Guitton,et al.  Multiple attenuation in complex geology with a pattern-based approach , 2005 .